ࡱ> kmdefghijq` [bjbjqPqP {::'( $$$$&(L+>1l2225lK$BQ$Hhhkn5@5kk22BBBkF R2R22kBB*b""2|+ E$^tS\0KrtwB6`VTN[ H`DdVTVTVT~jVTVTVTkkkk!:v8ds:8 Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Reports of Meetings of Experts and Equivalent Bodies Working Group on Tsunamis and Other Hazards Related to Sea-Level Warning and Mitigation Systems (TOWS-WG) First Meeting UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, France 34 April 2008 Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Reports of Meetings of Experts and Equivalent Bodies Working Group on Tsunamis and Other Hazards Related to Sea-Level Warning and Mitigation Systems (TOWS-WG) First Meeting UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, France 34 April 2008 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Paris, 23 April 2008 Original: English( Table of contents Page TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u   HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728076" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  PAGEREF _Toc201728076 \h iii  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728078" Rsum analytique  PAGEREF _Toc201728078 \h v  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728079" RESUMEN DISPOSITIVO  PAGEREF _Toc201728079 \h vii  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728080"  ' .  PAGEREF _Toc201728080 \h ix  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728081" 1. Opening & Welcome  PAGEREF _Toc201728081 \h 1  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728082" 2. Background  PAGEREF _Toc201728082 \h 1  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728083" 2.1 Review of the work of the GOHWMS  PAGEREF _Toc201728083 \h 1  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728084" 2.2 Terms of Reference for TOWS-WG  PAGEREF _Toc201728084 \h 3  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728085" 2.3 Context within IOC and UNESCO  PAGEREF _Toc201728085 \h 3  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728086" 3. Review of issues from relevant bodies  PAGEREF _Toc201728086 \h 4  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728087" 3.1 Issues from the perspective of the ICGs  PAGEREF _Toc201728087 \h 4  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728088" 3.1 Other IOC Bodies  PAGEREF _Toc201728088 \h 5  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728089" 3.2 Other external bodies  PAGEREF _Toc201728089 \h 6  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728090" 4. Review of reports and agreed actions  PAGEREF _Toc201728090 \h 7  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728091" 4.1 Sea level tide-gauge network for tsunami/hazards  PAGEREF _Toc201728091 \h 7  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728092" 4.2 Deep-sea pressure measurements  PAGEREF _Toc201728092 \h 8  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728093" 4.3 Regional and National Tsunami Watch standards  PAGEREF _Toc201728093 \h 8  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728094" 4.4 Seismic data  PAGEREF _Toc201728094 \h 8  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728095" 4.5 RTWC and NTWC operation  PAGEREF _Toc201728095 \h 9  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728096" 4.6 IOC approach to coastal hazards  PAGEREF _Toc201728096 \h 9  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728097" 4.7 Capacity building and coastal hazards  PAGEREF _Toc201728097 \h 10  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728098" 4.8 Bathymetry  PAGEREF _Toc201728098 \h 10  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728099" 4.9 Telecommunications  PAGEREF _Toc201728099 \h 11  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728100" 4.10 Capacity Building, Education and Training  PAGEREF _Toc201728100 \h 11  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728101" 4.11 Tsunami and other hazard information sources  PAGEREF _Toc201728101 \h 11  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728102" 5. High-level coordination and governance  PAGEREF _Toc201728102 \h 12  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728103" 6. High-level Coordination of Funding  PAGEREF _Toc201728103 \h 15  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728104" 7. REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COUNCIL  PAGEREF _Toc201728104 \h 15  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728105" 8. OTHER ISSUES  PAGEREF _Toc201728105 \h 16  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728106" 8.1 Membership  PAGEREF _Toc201728106 \h 16  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728107" 8.2 Date and Place of the Next Meeting  PAGEREF _Toc201728107 \h 16  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc201728108" 9. CLOSURE OF MEETING  PAGEREF _Toc201728108 \h 16 ANNEXES I. AGENDA II. TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE WORKING GROUP ON TSUNAMIS AND OTHER HAZARDS RELATED TO SEA-LEVEL WARNING AND MITIGATION SYSTEMS (TOWS-WG) III. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS IV. FRAMEWORK FOR THE GLOBAL TSUNAMI AND OTHER OCEAN-RELATED HAZARDS EARLY WARNING SYSTEM V. LIST OF ACRONYMS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The TOWS-WG reviewed previous work by the GOWHMS. The Framework document was considered and a final version agreed. The TOWS-WG considered the status of the tsunami warning Systems and of other subsidiary bodies insofar as it impacted the mandate of the TOWS-WG. Capacity building and information exchange and outreach were given particular attention. The TOWS-WG believes a global core network of sea level tide gauges should be defined by JCOMM/GLOSS for tsunami and ocean hazards, building on the GLOSS core for climate wherever possible. TOWS-WG further believes the tsunameter Partnership should transition to an Action Group under the JCOMM/DBCP, to exploit synergies and to encourage a global role. The TOWS-WG believes IOC should adopt standards and endorse practices for the tsunami Systems as a whole and, to this end, will undertake a study of guidelines for regional and national tsunami watch standards. It also supported the publication of standardized procedures to evaluate actions taken by regional and national Tsunami Warning Centres during tsunamigenic events. The TOWS-WG noted some issues with exchange of seismic data, including interoperability. Real time data sharing and optimising the timely use of existing solutions were two factors. The TOWS-WG proposed creating a small task team to examine the issues and report back to the next meeting. The WG were apprised of a number of remaining telecommunication issues. The TOWS-WG agreed to undertake an analysis of need, including how to access GTS information and the issue of access beyond the NMHSs. The TOWS-WG noted that IOC capability for coastal hazards resides in a number of primary and secondary subsidiary bodies. It also noted the emergence of the ICSU Scientific Planning Group in disasters caused by natural hazards and agreed that, in concert with the Ocean Sciences Program, it should test the potential benefits of working with ICSU in this area. The TOWS-WG further noted the need for enhanced attention to ecosystem observations to support coastal hazard studies and vulnerability and post-hazard assessment programs. The TOWS-WG noted the many references to the need for high-resolution bathymetric data and digital elevation models, including in the GOWHMS Framework document. The TOWS-WG suggests the Executive Council give urgent attention to this matter. The TOWS-WG noted that Capacity Building requirements often transcended the boundaries of the ICG, and sometimes of IOC itself. Dialogue and coordination with potential donors/funders should be at a high level, to ensure consistency in messages and actions and optimize the response. The WG may be able to play a role. In a similar vein, the TOWS-WG believes information exchange and outreach should be coordinated a high-level, notwithstanding the fact that some actions may be region specific. In general, the TOWS-WG believes it may be timely to consolidate and transition (or share) work with other bodies of IOC in a number of areas (science, observation, services). The TOWS-WG made a number of observations on the governance and mode of operation of the ICGs, noting some potential inefficiency. There should be a number of standing items in each ICG agenda. The TOWS-WG noted that the interaction between the ICGs and the Governing Body was at times both ineffective and inefficient. The TOWS-WG asks the Executive Council to consider tasking the WG with review of the input from the ICGs with a view to streamlining and rationalising the input so that only those matters requiring decision were tabled, and in such a way as to harmonise the work of the Commission and introduce consistency. The TOWS-WG agreed to review the organisation and coordination among working groups of the ICGs. High-level coordination of funding was considered, including support for the Secretariat. Tight and effective strategic planning, efficient coordination, and clear priorities were highlighted. The WG also recognized distinct advantages in acting as one within the IOC, e.g. in working with ISDR and its partners. Rsum analytique Le TOWS-WG a tudi les travaux antrieurs du GOHWMS. Le Document-cadre a t examin et une version finale a t adopte. Le TOWS-WG a examin le statut des Systmes d'alerte aux tsunamis et dautres organes subsidiaires dans la mesure o il avait des incidences sur son mandat. Le renforcement des capacits, lchange dinformations et le champ daction ont fait lobjet dune attention particulire. Le TOWS-WG estime que la JCOMM/GLOSS devrait dfinir un rseau mondial de base de margraphes pour les tsunamis et les alas ocaniques en sappuyant, autant que possible, sur le rseau de base du GLOSS pour le climat. Le TOWS-WG considre en outre que le Partenariat international pour les tsunamimtres devrait devenir un Groupe daction relevant de la JCOMM/DBCP afin de tirer parti des synergies et de favoriser un rle mondial. Le TOWS-WG estime que la COI devrait adopter des normes et approuver des pratiques pour les Systmes d'alerte aux tsunamis dans leur ensemble et, cette fin, raliser une tude des principes directeurs relatifs aux normes rgionales et nationales en matire de veille aux tsunamis. Il sest galement prononc en faveur de la publication de procdures normalises pour lvaluation des mesures prises par les Centres d'alerte aux tsunamis rgionaux et nationaux lors de phnomnes tsunamignes. Le TOWS-WG a constat quelques problmes concernant lchange de donnes sismiques, notamment en matire dinteroprabilit. Le partage des donnes en temps rel et loptimisation du recours aux solutions existantes en temps utile en sont deux facteurs. Le TOWS-WG a propos la cration dune quipe spciale restreinte charge dexaminer ces problmes et de faire rapport la prochaine runion. Le TOWS-WG a t inform dun certain nombre de problmes de tlcommunication restant rsoudre. Il a dcid deffectuer une analyse des besoins, notamment en ce qui concerne la manire daccder aux informations du SMT et la question de laccs au-del des services mtorologiques et hydrologiques nationaux (NMHS). Le TOWS-WG a not que la comptence de la COI en matire dalas ctiers se situait dans un certain nombre dorganes subsidiaires principaux et secondaires. Il a galement pris acte de lmergence du Groupe de planification du CIUS en matire de catastrophes dorigine naturelle et a convenu de tester, de concert avec le Programme docanologie, les ventuels avantages dune collaboration avec le CIUS dans ce domaine. Il a aussi jug ncessaire daccorder une plus grande attention aux observations des cosystmes lappui des tudes menes sur les alas ctiers ainsi que des programmes dvaluation de la vulnrabilit et des effets de ces alas. Le TOWS-WG a pris note des nombreuses allusions, y compris dans le Document-cadre du GOHWMS, la ncessit de disposer de donnes bathymtriques et de modles numriques dlvation haute rsolution. Il suggre que le Conseil excutif de la COI examine durgence cette question. Le TOWS-WG a constat que les exigences en matire de renforcement des capacits dpassaient souvent le cadre du GIC, et parfois de la COI elle-mme. Le dialogue et la coordination avec les donateurs/bailleurs potentiels devraient avoir lieu un haut niveau afin dassurer la cohrence des messages et des actions et doptimiser la rponse. Le Groupe de travail pourrait jouer un rle cet gard. Dans le mme ordre dides, il estime que lchange dinformations et le champ daction devraient tre coordonns un haut niveau, mme si certaines actions peuvent tre propres une rgion. Dune manire gnrale, le TOWS-WG estime quil est peut-tre temps de fusionner et de rpartir (ou partager) les travaux avec dautres organes de la COI dans un certain nombre de domaines (sciences, observation, services). Le TOWS-WG a fait plusieurs remarques concernant la gouvernance et le mode de fonctionnement des GIC, et attir lattention sur un certain risque dinefficacit. Plusieurs points devraient figurer en permanence lordre du jour de chaque GIC. Le TOWS-WG a not que linteraction entre les GIC et lorgane directeur tait parfois aussi inoprante quinefficace. Il demande au Conseil excutif denvisager de lui confier lexamen de lapport des GIC en vue de le rationaliser et de le simplifier, de sorte que seules les questions appelant une dcision soient prsentes, et ce de faon harmoniser les travaux de la Commission et assurer la cohrence. Le TOWS-WG est convenu de procder un examen de lorganisation et de la coordination entre les groupes de travail des diffrents GIC. Une coordination un haut niveau du financement, y compris lappui au Secrtariat, a t envisage. La ncessit dune planification stratgique rigoureuse et effective, dune coordination efficace et de priorits claires a t souligne. Le Groupe de travail a galement reconnu les avantages certains de lunit daction pour la COI, par exemple en collaborant avec le SIPC et ses partenaires. RESUMEN DISPOSITIVO El Grupo de Trabajo sobre sistemas de alerta contra tsunamis y otros peligros relacionados con el nivel del mar y atenuacin de sus efectos (TOWS-WG) pas revista a la labor realizada anteriormente por el GOWHMS. Se examin el Documento Marco y se aprob una versin final. El TOWS-WG examin la situacin de los sistemas de alerta contra los tsunamis y de otros rganos subsidiarios, en la medida en que incida en su mandato. Se prest especial atencin al aumento de capacidades y al intercambio y la difusin de informacin. El TOWS-WG estima que el GLOSS de la JCOMM debera definir una red bsica mundial de maregrafos en relacin con los tsunamis y otros peligros ocenicos, aprovechando la red bsica del GLOSS para el clima donde sea posible. El TOWS-WG considera adems que la International Tsunameter Partnership (ITP) debera transformarse en un Grupo de Accin adscrito al DBCP de la JCOMM, a fin de aprovechar las sinergias y propiciar un funcionamiento de mbito mundial. El TOWS-WG opina que la COI debera adoptar normas y avalar prcticas para el conjunto de los sistemas de alerta contra tsunamis y, con ese fin, iniciar un estudio de las directrices relativas a las normas nacionales y regionales en materia de vigilancia de los tsunamis. ElTOWSWG apoy tambin la publicacin de procedimientos normalizados para evaluar las medidas adoptadas por los centros nacionales y regionales de alerta contra los tsunamis cuando se han producido estos fenmenos. El TOWS-WG tom nota de algunos problemas relativos al intercambio de datos ssmicos, entre ellos la compatibilidad operacional. Dos factores considerados fueron el intercambio de datos en tiempo real y la optimizacin del uso oportuno de las soluciones existentes. ElTOWSWG propuso que se creara un Equipo Especial restringido que examine estos temas y le presente un informe al respecto en su prxima reunin. El Grupo de Trabajo recibi informacin acerca de diversos asuntos relativos a las telecomunicaciones que siguen pendientes. Acord iniciar un anlisis de las necesidades, comprendida la manera de acceder a la informacin del SMT y la cuestin del acceso fuera de los servicios meteorolgicos e hidrolgicos nacionales (NMHS). El TOWS-WG tom nota de que la competencia de la COI en materia de amenazas costeras dimana de varios rganos subsidiarios primarios y secundarios. Tambin tom nota de la creacin del Grupo de Planificacin Cientfica del ICSU sobre Desastres Naturales y acord que, en consulta con el Programa de Ciencias Ocenicas, debera examinar los posibles beneficios que reportara la colaboracin con el ICSU en este mbito. El TOWS-WG tom nota adems de la necesidad de conceder mayor atencin a las observaciones de los ecosistemas con el fin de apoyar los estudios relativos a las amenazas costeras y los programas de evaluacin de la vulnerabilidad y de los efectos de los desastres. El TOWS-WG tom nota de las mltiples referencias a la necesidad de disponer de datos batimtricos de alta resolucin y de modelos numricos de elevacin, en particular en el Documento Marco del GOWHMS. El TOWS-WG sugiere que el Consejo Ejecutivo examine con urgencia este asunto. El TOWS-WG seal que las necesidades en materia de aumento de capacidades rebasaban a menudo el marco del ICG y a veces tambin de la COI. El dilogo y la coordinacin con donantes y contribuyentes potenciales deberan situarse en un nivel elevado, a fin de garantizar la coherencia de los mensajes y las actividades, y optimizar la respuesta. El Grupo de Trabajo podra desempear una funcin al respecto. Asimismo, el TOWS-WG considera que la difusin y el intercambio de informacin deberan coordinarse en un nivel elevado, aunque algunas actividades puedan ser especficas de una determinada regin. En general, el TOWS-WG estima que sera oportuno agrupar algunas tareas o traspasarlas a otros rganos de la COI en determinados mbitos (ciencias, observacin, servicios). El TOWS-WG formul varias observaciones acerca de la direccin y el funcionamiento de losICG y seal varias deficiencias posibles. Ciertos puntos deberan figurar siempre en el orden del da de cada ICG. El TOWS-WG seal que la interaccin entre los ICG y el rgano rector era a veces ineficaz e inoperante. El TOWS-WG pidi al Consejo Ejecutivo que examinara la posibilidad de encargarle el examen de los aportes de los ICG, a fin de simplificarlos y racionalizarlos, de modo que nicamente se sometan los asuntos que requieren una decisin, a fin de que se armonice la labor de la Comisin y se le confiera coherencia. El TOWS-WG acord examinar la organizacin y coordinacin de las tareas que realizan los grupos de trabajo de los ICG. Se examin la coordinacin de la financiacin en un nivel elevado, comprendido el apoyo a la Secretara. Se insisti en la importancia de una planificacin estratgica rigurosa y efectiva, una coordinacin eficiente y prioridades claras. El Grupo de Trabajo reconoci tambin las ventajas de la  unidad de accin en el marco de la COI, por ejemplo, en la colaboracin con la Estrategia Internacional de Reduccin de Desastres (EIRD) y sus asociados. ' . -!& >ACI5AB28;0 >17>@ @01>BK, ?@>45;0==>9 @0=55 ! &. =0 @0AA<>B@5;0 0<>G=K9 4>:C<5=B 8 A>3;0A8;0AL A 53> >:>=G0B5;L=K< 20@80=B><. -!& @0AA<>B@5;0 AB0BCA A8AB5< ?@54C?@5645=8O > FC=0<8 8 4@C38E 2A?><>30B5;L=KE >@30=>2 2 B>9 <5@5, 2 :>B>@>9 >= 2;8O5B =0 <0=40B -!&. A>1>5 2=8<0=85 1K;> C45;5=> 2>?@>A0< A>740=8O ?>B5=F80;0, >1<5=0 8=D>@<0F859 8 55 @0A?@>AB@0=5=8O. -!& AG8B05B, GB> 4;O F5;59 ?@54C?@5645=8O > FC=0<8 8 4@C38E >?0A=KE >:50=8G5A:8E O2;5=8OE !/!! A;54C5B >?@545;8BL >A=>2=CN 3;>10;L=CN A5BL <0@5>3@0D>2, ?> 2>7<>6=>AB8, >?8@0OAL =0 >A=>2=CN A5BL !!, ?@54=07=0G5==CN 4;O :;8<0B8G5A:8E 87<5@5=89. -!& AG8B05B B0:65, GB> 7040G8 ?0@B=5@AB20 2 >B=>H5=88 FC=0<8<5B@>2 4>;6=K ?5@59B8 : 3@C??5 459AB289 2 @0<:0E !/ 4;O 8A?>;L7>20=8O A8=5@388 8 2K?>;=5=8O 3;>10;L=>9 @>;8. -!& AG8B05B, GB>  A;54C5B CB25@48BL AB0=40@BK 8 >4>1@8BL ?@0:B8:C @01>BK A8AB5< ?> FC=0<8 2 F5;>< 8 GB> 4;O MB>3> =5>1E>48<> ?@>25AB8 8AA;54>20=85 @C:>2>4OI8E ?@8=F8?>2 4;O @538>=0;L=KE 8 =0F8>=0;L=KE AB0=40@B>2 A;565=8O 70 FC=0<8. =0 B0:65 2KA:070;0AL 70 ?C1;8:0F8N AB0=40@B=KE ?@>F54C@ >F5=:8 459AB289, ?@54?@8=8<05<KE @538>=0;L=K<8 8 =0F8>=0;L=K<8 F5=B@0<8 ?@54C?@5645=8O > FC=0<8 2 E>45 FC=0<835==KE A>1KB89. -!& >B<5B8;0 =5:>B>@K5 2>?@>AK, :0A0NI85AO >1<5=0 A59A<8G5A:8<8 40==K<8, 2:;NG0O 2>?@>AK >?5@0B82=>9 A>2<5AB8<>AB8. 2C<O D0:B>@0<8 O2;ONBAO ?@54>AB02;5=85 40==KE 2 @568<5 @50;L=>3> 2@5<5=8 8 >?B8<870F8O A2>52@5<5==>3> 8A?>;L7>20=8O 8<5NI8EAO @5H5=89. -!& ?@54;>68;0 A>740BL =51>;LHCN F5;52CN 3@C??C 4;O 87CG5=8O MB8E 2>?@>A>2 8 ?@54AB02;5=8O 4>:;040 55 A;54CNI5<C 70A540=8N. -!& 1K;0 ?@>8=D>@<8@>20=0 > @O45 A>E@0=ONI8EAO 2>?@>A>2 2 >1;0AB8 :><<C=8:0F88. -!& A>3;0A8;0AL >ACI5AB28BL 0=0;87 ?>B@51=>AB59, 2:;NG0O E0@0:B5@ 4>ABC?0 : 8=D>@<0F88 !" 8 2>?@>A 4>ABC?0 2=5 !. -!& >B<5B8;0, GB> 2>7<>6=>AB8  2 >B=>H5=88 >?0A=>AB59 2 ?@81@56=>9 7>=5 7028AOB >B 2>7<>6=>AB59 @O40 ?5@28G=KE 8 2B>@8G=KE 2A?><>30B5;L=KE >@30=>2. =0 B0:65 >B<5B8;0 A>740=85 0CG=>9 3@C??K !! ?> ?;0=8@>20=8N 2 A8BC0F8OE 154AB289, 2K720==KE AB8E89=K<8 >?0A=>ABO<8, 8 A>3;0A8;0AL A B5<, GB> 2<5AB5 A ?@>3@0<<>9 =0C: >1 >:50=5 59 A;54C5B >?@>1>20BL ?>B5=F80;L=K5 ?@58<CI5AB20 A>2<5AB=>9 45OB5;L=>AB8 A !! 2 MB>9 >1;0AB8. -!& 40;55 >B<5B8;0 =5>1E>48<>ABL C45;OBL 1>;55 ?@8AB0;L=>5 2=8<0=85 M:>A8AB5<=K< =01;N45=8O< 2 ?>445@6:C 8AA;54>20=89 >?0A=>AB59 2 ?@81@56=KE @09>=0E =0@O4C A ?@>3@0<<0<8 >F5=:8 CO728<>AB8 8 A8BC0F88 ?>A;5 154AB289. -!& >B<5B8;0 1>;LH>5 G8A;> AAK;>: =0 ?>B@51=>ABL 2 10B8<5B@8G5A:8E 40==KE A 2KA>:>9 @07@5H0NI59 A?>A>1=>ABLN 8 F8D@>2KE <>45;OE 4;O ?@>2545=8O >F5=>:, 2 B>< G8A;5 2 0<>G=>< 4>:C<5=B5 ! &. -!& ?@54;0305B, GB>1K A?>;=8B5;L=K9 A>25B C45;8; MB><C 2>?@>AC =5>B;>6=>5 2=8<0=85. -!& >B<5B8;0, GB> B@51>20=8O, :0A0NI85AO A>740=8O ?>B5=F80;0, G0AB> 2KE>4OB 70 3@0=8FK  8, ?>4G0A, A0<>9 . !;54C5B ?>445@6820BL =0 2KA>:>< C@>2=5 480;>3 8 :>>@48=0F8N @01>BK A 4>=>@0<8/D8=0=A8@CNI8<8 AB>@>=0<8, A B5< GB>1K >15A?5G8BL A>3;0A>20==>ABL @0A?@>AB@0=O5<KE 8459 8 45OB5;L=>AB8 8 ?>;CG5=85 >?B8<0;L=>3> >B:;8:0. -!&, 2>7<>6=>, A?>A>1=0 AK3@0BL 2 MB>< A2>N @>;L. =0;>38G=K< >1@07><, -!& AG8B05B, GB> ACI5AB2C5B =5>1E>48<>ABL >15A?5G8BL 2KA>:89 C@>25=L :>>@48=0F88 >1<5=0 8=D>@<0F859 8 55 @0A?@>AB@0=5=8O, ?CABL 4065 >?@545;5==K5 459AB28O <>3CB 8<5BL @538>=0;L=CN A?5F8D8:C.  F5;>< -!& ?>;0305B, GB>, 2>7<>6=>, =0AB0;> 2@5<O C:@5?8BL 2708<>459AB285 A 4@C38<8 >@30=0<8  8;8 A>2<5AB=> 2K?>;=OBL A =8<8 @01>BC 2 @O45 >1;0AB59 (=0C:0, =01;N45=8O 8 A;C61K). -!& AD>@<C;8@>20;0 @O4 A>>1@065=89 >B=>A8B5;L=> C?@02;5=8O 8 A?>A>10 DC=:F8>=8@>20=8O <56?@028B5;LAB25==KE :>>@48=0F8>==KE 3@C??, >B<5B82 =5:>B>@CN ?>B5=F80;L=CN =5MDD5:B82=>ABL.  ?>25AB:5 4=O :064>9  4>;65= 1KBL @O4 ?>AB>O==KE 2>?@>A>2. -!& >B<5B8;0, GB> 2 @O45 A;CG052 2708<>459AB285 <564C =5:>B>@K<8  8 @C:>2>4OI8< >@30=>< 1K;> D>@<0;L=K< 8 =5MDD5:B82=K<. -!& ?@>A8B A?>;=8B5;L=K9 A>25B @0AA<>B@5BL 2>?@>A > B><, GB>1K ?>@CG8BL 59 ?@>2545=85 >17>@0 2:;040 <564C=0@>4=KE :>>@48=0F8>==KE 3@C?? 2 F5;OE 53> C?>@O4>G5=8O 8 @0F8>=0;870F88 B0:8< >1@07><, GB>1K 2=>A8;8AL B>;L:> 2>?@>AK, B@51CNI85 @5H5=8O, GB>1K B5< A0<K< ?@840BL 30@<>=8G=>ABL @01>B5 ><8AA88 8 >15A?5G8BL ?>A;54>20B5;L=>ABL 459AB289. -!& ?@8H;0 : 4>3>2>@5==>AB8 > ?@>2545=88 >17>@0 >@30=870F88 8 :>>@48=0F88 @01>G8E 3@C?? 2 @0<:0E <564C=0@>4=KE :>>@48=0F8>==KE 3@C??. K; @0AA<>B@5= 2>?@>A :>>@48=0F88 D8=0=A8@>20=8O =0 2KA>:>< C@>2=5, 2:;NG0O >:070=85 ?>445@6:8 !5:@5B0@80BC. K;> >1@0I5=> >A>1>5 2=8<0=85 =0 2>?@>AK AB@>3>3> 8 MDD5:B82=>3> AB@0B538G5A:>3> ?;0=8@>20=8O, MDD5:B82=>9 :>>@48=0F88 8 G5B:8E ?@8>@8B5B>2. -!& B0:65 ?@87=0;0 >G5284=>5 ?@58<CI5AB2> 45OB5;L=>AB8 2 @0<:0E  ?> ?@8=F8?C 548=>3> F5;>3>, =0?@8<5@, 2 @01>B5 A !# 8 55 ?0@B=5@0<8. Opening & Welcome Neville Smith opened the meeting. He noted that this is a formally constituted WG of the Executive Council and will report to the upcoming EC and to the 25th Assembly, at which time a decision will be made on its future. The TOWS-WG has a substantial basis arising from the work of the Global Tsunami and other Ocean-related Hazards Early Warning and Mitigation System (GOHWMS) WG. He further noted that initially, through the GOHWMS WG, the scope was quite general tsunami, all ocean-related hazards, references to a system, etc. The TOWS-WG mandate (see Attachment 1) is narrower, focused around sea-level and coastal inundation, and no longer associates the WG with a system (of systems); it does however strongly mandate TOWS to develop a systematic approach. The Agenda (Attachment 2) was adopted. The participants are shown at Attachment 3. Background Review of the work of the GOHWMS Franois Grard reviewed of the work of GOHWMS ad-hoc working group which produced the framework document for global tsunami and other ocean-related hazards early warning systems. He pointed out the need to include all relevant bodies inside IOC (like I-GOOS, JCOMM and IODE) and the UN system (like WMO and ISDR) to ensure synergies and mutual benefit. He also stressed the difficulty to harmonise fully among the existing IOC bodies. The working group reviewed the Framework document and agreed to modifications based on comments received at the last meeting of the GOHWMS WG, principally from WMO, and changes to reflect recent developments. The final text is included as Attachment 4 to this report. The TOWS-WG agreed that the Table Characteristics of Hazards provided a useful reference for future discussions. A slightly modified version is included here (Table 1) reflecting views of the TOWS-WG, with a view to providing additional updates as the work of the WG matures. Table  SEQ "Tableau" \*Arabic 1: Characteristics of the hazards creating coastal inundation and common topics MARINE HAZARD TsunamiStorm surgeExtreme wind-forced wavesLong-term sea-level riseLikely frequency of eventDecades to millennia, depending on regional tectonic regimeMonths to decades, depending on regional climate regimeMonths to decades, depending on regional climate regimeOn-going, a consequence of global warming and local factorsType of impactCatastrophic inundation and drainage surges, perhaps multipleCatastrophic, single-event inundation Multiple, localized inundation and drainage surgesProgressive rise of mean high (tidal) water levelLimits of area likely to be affectedLocal run-up limit for specified wave amplitudes predicted by modellingFlood limit for specific surge level and due to upstream riverine flooding due to heavy rain over upper catchment by hydrological modellingFlood limit for specified wave heights predicted by terrain modellingMean high water mark predicted by terrain modelling with allowance for extreme events Potential warning timeMinutes to hours, depending on proximity of source location24-48 hours in advance, depending on climatic factorsHours to days, depending on climatic factorsDecades to centenniaAction by Regional Warning CentreIssuance of Watches, Advisories and Warnings to National CentresNo actionAction by National Warning Centre(s) Immediate transmission of Advisories and Warnings to appropriate Local AuthoritiesNo actionEmergency actions by Local AuthoritiesStand-by for emergency response action on receipt of AdvisoryNo actionLaunch of emergency response action on receipt of WarningMitigation by Local and National Authorities and stakeholdersVulnerability assessment of coastal populations, ecosystems, and infrastructure; Strategic spatial planning and regulation to minimize exposure and vulnerability: Participatory approach; Decision tools and software for analysing hazard loss and riskPublic awareness and readiness campaigns, including recognition programmes and emergency response exercises (preparedness) and education (preparedness and adaptation); Promoting community resilience. The TOWS-WG also discussed the current status of the actions in the Framework document. Coordination of sea-level observations. This has progress, with agreement that GLOSS will be the focal point. It was noted that INMARSAT is now providing real-time communications. Some further advice is included under agenda Items 3 and 4. Seismic observation network. Has largely progressed as indicated. Standards and procedures. The ICGs and JCOMM have taken this finding on board and progressed actions. Some further considerations are discussed under Items 3 and 4. Capacity building. It was noted that some elements have been actioned within the IOC CB programme of work, such as coastal modelling. It was noted that the ISDR and its UN partners provide a crucial element and that UNDP has been pivotal in developing awareness and preparedness, particular at the country level. This is also picked up in later actions. Coastal zone and geohazards. It was noted that the GEO Tsunami WG has now been dissolved. The TOWS-WG noted that it should work through coastal GOOS and with the ICAM Programme when dealing with coastal zone issues. The GEO Communities of Practice for geohazards, developing from the Theme within IGOS-P provides a convenient communication mechanism in that area. The WG drew attention to the fact that GEBCO should be explicitly actioned with regard to bathymetric data, an issue that remains outstanding. Terms of Reference for TOWS-WG The WG co-chair reviewed resolution IOC XXIV-14 and the task given to the TOWS WG (see Attachment 1). He stressed that strong links to existing bodies are essential for ensuring issues are implemented in a coordinated way. Some key elements are: Harmonisation of reporting and governance arrangements Interoperability and efficiency Coordination with others Advisory to Governing body: no capacity to instruct other subsidiary bodies Will have to operate efficiently and remain focused The WG agreed it was preferable to address a small number of issues well rather than many issues poorly. The TOWS-WG must work with the ICGs and facilitate joined outcomes and avoid division and replication. The TOWS-WG suggested adding participation of other relevant groups/programmes mentioned in the resolution, in particular ICAM. It also noted the importance of links to the WMO EC Working Group on Disaster Risk Reduction and agreed the finalized Terms of Reference should be provided to the TOWS-WG members when available. [Action: Secretariat] Context within IOC and UNESCO The co-chair summarized the tasks and work for the TOWS-WG within the framework of UNESCOs 34/C5 and its Main Lines of Action (MLA), including MLA 3 on disaster reduction and mitigation. This MLA translates to high level objectives HLO 1 - Prevention and reduction of the impacts of natural hazards within the context of the IOC strategic plan. This clearly defines IOCs role and possible contribution on preparedness and outreach material and training on the different levels in the context of and collaboration with other relevant UN bodies. Particular attention was drawn to the expected results for MLA 3 (HLO 1): Risks from tsunamis and other ocean-related hazards reduced through early warning systems and preparedness and mitigation measures Number of regional early warning systems for tsunamis and other ocean-related hazards operational (4 regional tsunami systems operational or strengthened as part of the global multi-hazard warning system) Number of preparedness materials produced or communities at risk educated with respect to natural hazards impact prevention, preparedness and mitigation measures (6 culturally adapted and gender-responsive tsunami preparedness educational materials produced in different languages; 1 community per regional warning system educated) Review of issues from relevant bodies Issues from the perspective of the ICGs Indian and Pacific Ocean Tsunami Early Warning and Mitigation Systems The TOWS-WG noted a number of findings and recommendations of the recent ICG/PTWS session in Ecuador as well as the ICG/IOTWS in Mombasa. The summary focussed on issues relevant to the WG mandate. These included a functional website as an essential tool for the PTWS and probably all ICGs. Both sessions also sought clarity on the future function of ITIC. The PTWS and IOTWS sessions recommended addressing ocean data buoys and more generally instrumentation standards on a global level. International workshops could help with that issue. The PTWS offered to globalize existing documents and manuals like the user guide or SOPs. Both sessions also noted that global data centres for tsunami related data are required. It was recognized that JCOMM and its subsidiary bodies were already coordinating elements of instrumentation networks. The WG recognized that work was well advanced within the ICGs in the development of appropriate data and metadata standards for tide gauges and tsunameters, and that actual and potential data and metadata repositories and archival centres had been identified. Nevertheless, there remained a requirement to ensure that this work was properly coordinated across all the ICGs, working through IODE and JCOMM as the appropriate global subsidiary bodies. Stefanie Dannenmann mentioned that it would be very valuable to have minimum requirements for national plans defined to provide some guidance to MS what should be addressed. KJ Ramesh mentioned that India through INCOIS is constantly improving the instrumentation networks of tide gauges, tsunameters and seismic stations as well as model scenarios based on bathymetric data. Open data access and IOC data policy has been intensively discussed in both regions. The TOWS-WG agreed that this remains a key issue for regional TWS. Tsunami Early Warning and Mitigation System in the North-Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and Connected Seas (NEAMTWS) Gerassimos Papadopolos summarized the actual situation for ICG/NEAMTWS, its last session in Lisbon and the major decision to establish an ad-hoc Task Team on the regional architecture, which met in February 2008 in Paris. The ICG/NEAMTWS coordination process has been recognized by the European Unions high level commission on disaster risk reduction as the key and leading process to deal with tsunamis and coastal inundation in general. Tsunami and other Coastal Hazards Warning System for the Caribbean and Adjacent Regions (CARIBE-EWS) Lorna Inniss, Chairperson of the ICG/CARIBE-EWS, reported that the ICG is quite satisfied with the progress and agreement on data exchange reached so far. She emphasized that the Caribbean group from the very beginning was interested to go for a multi-hazard approach which would include storm surges and hurricanes. She reported that WG 1 has been mandated to look into the requirements for a regional tsunami warning centre as a basis for MS to decide if they can offer such a centre. Barbados is prepared to host a regional TIC supported by ITIC in Hawaii and with strong links to existing Hurricane Information Centres in the region. Thorkild Aarup reported that IOC plans to re-establish up to 19 tsunami-ready tide gauges in the Caribbean with support from different donors like the World Bank and NOAA. With respect to the plans to upgrade the regional sea-level networks David Green mentioned the need to ensure sustainability of these instrumentation networks. The TOWS-WG agreed that the SIDS meetings should be used more proactively to get TWS issues on their agenda and to investigate possible interaction with the recently established ICSU programme on multi-hazard research. Other IOC Bodies Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) Franois Grard, as Chairman of I-GOOS, reported on the recent decisions and activities in his group and stressed the importance of data access and exchange and mentioned an upcoming initiative with IOC/ABE-LOS to foster data exchange and provide legal instruments for bilateral arrangements between MS. He also emphasized that due to the request of some MS the existing ICGs should be open to take concerns of countries outside the key areas of interest into account. The TOWS-WG emphasised the central role of GOOS, particularly within a multi-hazard approach. Of particular interest was the potential for GOOS to provide leadership for coastal hazards, both in terms of development of observational infrastructure and in the development of products and services. One example is the challenge of providing total sea level displacement products (predictions) for hazards, combining the effects of tides, surges, coastal flooding and, as appropriate, tsunami. Some coastal predictions systems developed under the Global Ocean Data Assimilation Experiment are addressing this challenge. Another aspect relates to ecosystem observations and coastal hazards. Disaster mitigation and coastal hazards are now prominent in both the UNESCO and IOC strategies and the GOOS Scientific Steering Committee should consider the implementation of its Coastal GOOS plan within that light. Joint WMO-IOC Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology (JCOMM) Peter Dexter recalled the role and mandate of JCOMM as a joint coordination body to WMO and IOC. He reported on JCOMMs observations programmes like ocean data buoys and GLOSS. JCOMMs services and data management programme areas cover activities such as storm surges and an ocean data portal. Based on its long history JCOMM is establishing a catalogue of existing standards and best practices, as well as developing new standards for ocean data exchange and management. The need for tsunami related archiving has been mentioned and requires further thought on how best to tackle the issue. KJ Ramesh drew attention to the need for integrating tidal and atmospheric forcing for forecasting the total water level envelope. Data and Information Management IODE was not represented at the meeting but a number of related issues were raised by the TOWS-WG, including the telecommunication of data. One issue which was raised at the 2007 WMO meeting in Bangkok, was how to provide more general and timely access to GTS data, both for NMHSs that presently do not have access to sea level data, and for others who do not have links to the GTS at all. In principle, the new WMO Information System will have such capability, but the TOWS-WG emphasized that the matter should receive priority. There would appear to be three aspects requiring attention Enabling full functionality for those who already have GTS access; Enabling access for those not connected to the GTS; and Integrating telecommunication systems other than the GTS into the system Other external bodies World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Peter Dexter reported relevant WMO activities and programmes related to TOWS and explicitly reminded the group to further make use of the GTS/WIS as the backbone communication means for hazard warnings and sea-level data, while the GTS will constantly be upgraded to increase reliability and bandwidth. He emphasised that the WMO Congress gave quite strong support for both the technical work for the marine programme implemented through JCOMM as well as the WMO DRR capacity building activities. The TOWS-WG recommended investigating common capacity building needs of WMO and IOC on how to access tsunami relevant information on GTS and investigate the areas where the GTS still needs to be upgraded to be capable to provide that information. In several cases the national TWFP is not the national Met Service, which requires ensuring the information is forwarded in real time (see also the previous item). WMO is drafting terms of reference for an Executive Council Working Group on Disaster Risk Reduction and Service Delivery, which will be adopted by the coming EC session. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR) Stefanie Dannenmann of UN/ISDR-PPEW, reported on their recent activities in collaboration with IOC and in relation to the ICG-TWS processes. She explicitly mentioned the strong links to IOC e.g. through the Indian Ocean Consortium and more basically through the ISDR system partners approach. In that respect ISDR is mainly acting as a broker between donors and ISDR system partners implementing the overall goal of building an end-to-end TWS. From her experience with WG6 of the ICG/IOTWS which has received some funding through ISDR, she raised concern on the sustainability of the coordination process when the funding is not available any more. Tsunami Information Exchange At the request of the TOWS-WG, the US member of the Group provided an update on the status of the International Tsunami Information Unit (ITIC), in the light of its historic activity and role within IOC and the recent developments in connection with the US Tsunami Act. At this point the ITIC requires completion of a MOU process between IOC and NOAA to help clarify its contribution to the global tsunami community and to facilitate funding of related programmatic areas. This could result in the need for a new Terms of Reference for the ITIC but also help recognize that the U.S. is proposing to operate the Centre and hosting services for IOC for technology transfer and education as prescribed under U.S. Public Law 109-424 Tsunami Warning and Education Act. The establishment of an integrated strategy for tsunami information/education, including the development of regional Tsunami Information Centres (TICs), is an important issue in the view of the TOWS WG, and the experience of ITIC provides a significant basis. Review of reports and agreed actions In broad terms, the TOWS-WG focused its attention in the following areas, consistent with IOC Resolution XXIV-14: Standards for observations Data management Tele-communication Forecast/warning practices Capacity building and outreach Areas where the TOWS-WG can add value and lead coordination The aim was to distil a number of actions from the discussions, particular those under Item 3 that would progress the agenda provided to the TOWS-WG. Where appropriate we have noted the likely points for action, but subject to EC endorsement. Sea level tide-gauge network for tsunami/hazards As noted previously, GLOSS has been given responsibility for further development of the network, with requirements specified through the ICGs and through other bodies concerned with coastal hazards (e.g., the coastal observation plans of GOOS). The TOWS-WG is fully supportive of this approach, noting that this is an example where the action for individual requirements of bodies has been passed to a body with a broader mandate and specific capability. The TOWS-WG encourages definition of a global core network for tsunami and ocean hazards. It would: Build on the existing GLOSS core (for climate) wherever possible; Take account of requirements for prediction, detection and post-hazard assessments; and Be guided by requirements from Coastal GOOS as well as the tsunami community. The TOWS-WG agreed that the Caribbean and North African regions should be given priority. Action point: GLOSS/JCOMM Deep-sea pressure measurements These networks are driven almost exclusively by TWS requirements. The TOWS-WG agreed that an action group under the JCOMM/DBCP would be an appropriate long-term home for the current Partnership, noting that this was consistent with the principle of transferring responsibilities out of the individual ICGs to bodies that hold relevant capability as the systems mature and extended beyond single regions. The terms of reference of the Partnership may need modification to be consistent with those of DBCP Action Groups. Action: JCOMM Chair, International Tsunameter Partnership Chair Regional and National Tsunami Watch standards The TOWS-WG noted the requirement expressed by the ICGs for both the IOTWS and the PTWS for the standardization of formats and procedures for the issue of tsunami alerts and warnings, as well as for the adoption of a standardized approach to post-tsunami event reporting. It agreed that these were both issues where the adoption of common formats and procedures across all the ICGs was essential. The TOWS-WG noted the potential value to all ICGs of some global guidance on the organization and operation of TWS. Some elements of the draft Users Guide to the PTWS and the draft Regional Tsunami Watch Providers Implementation Plan for the IOTWS may be of value in developing these guidelines. The TOWS-WG also noted the task team established by the ICG/NEAMTWS and a working group established by the ICG/CARIBE-EWS. There is a need for a process and/or principles to guide all toward a common framework. In some cases, a multi-hazard approach is being taken, whereas in others the focus is just on tsunami. Engagement with JCOMM and WMO is needed. The TOWS-WG agreed to take on as an action the analysis of the guidelines developed by each ICG, with a view to identifying those characteristics which should be adopted in common, and those where there is not consensus. This action will need to be given priority since the TOWS-WG believes IOC should adopt standards and endorse practices for the tsunami systems as a whole, not individually. Action point: TOWS-WG. Seismic data The TOWS-WG was informed of some recent issues associated with the exchange of seismic data and interoperability of information exchange mechanisms (e.g. the recent experience of Peru). The primary requirement is the establishment of a national system, which can then be integrated into regional systems. With specific reference to the exchange of information on estimates of earthquake magnitude of disturbances, the TOWS-WG noted the following specific points: Real time data sharing system Relevant seismic data should be shared globally in order to analyze the total earthquake process/mechanism as best as possible. A standard procedure is needed. Use existing solutions provided by other centres as soon as possible For any major event centres should concentrate to determine focal parameters and in order to save precious time any focal parameters provided by other (e.g. regional) centres should be used as a basis for the national tsunami warnings. Develop a backup/support system among ICGs Once a possibly tsunamigenic event occurred the RTWCs will concentrate on monitoring the possible tsunami and updating the information. The RTWCs in other regions could support and provide more detailed information on the earthquake process/mechanism including a real time tsunami simulation based on the detailed analyzed focal mechanism. The TOWS-WG concluded that a small task team should be established with 1 or 2 participants from each ICG, to correspond on the issues noted above and propose a work plan for seeking resolution. Action: TOWS-WG RTWC and NTWC operation Quality controlled parametric data exchange procedure Quick quality controlled information (human intervention of automatic solutions) on the occurrence of a tsunamigenic earthquake is very useful as initial guidance and reference information for other national tsunami warning centres. A standard procedure shall be developed, perhaps including an ensemble approach. Develop a standardised procedure to evaluate the actions taken by RTWC and NTWC during a tsunamigenic event. Continuous progress of the TWS requires learning from actual tsunamigenic events. If we can share the information on action processes during a tsunamigenic event, it will enable to propose modifications to the SOP of RTWC and NTWC. This return of experience process will benefit from a common approach of all ICGs. Capacity building strategy at National and Regional Tsunami Warning Centres The quality of information provided by NTWC/RTWC depends on the capacity of the staff at NTWC/RTWC. A joint strategy to build up the capacity is required. The TOWS-WG supported the publication of standardized procedures to evaluate the action taken by RTWC and NTWC during a tsunamigenic event. Action: TCU IOC approach to coastal hazards The TOWS-WG noted that IOC capability for coastal hazards resides in a number of primary and secondary subsidiary bodies. GOOS, through its Panel for Integrated Coastal Observations is a lead agent for action, as are the ICGs for modelling of coastal inundation and risk assessment and vulnerability studies. JCOMM has led on storm surge and wave forecasting. The WG also noted the relevance of the ICAM Programme and other research activities (e.g., in relation to climate change impacts in coastal regions) and the potential for leadership from the Ocean Sciences area, a point that was made by the Report of the Advisory Group for the Ocean Sciences Section (IOC/EC XXXIX). For the particular requirement of coastal hazard research, the TOWS-WG noted the emergence of the ICSU Scientific Planning Group in Natural Disasters and the potential benefits of working with ICSU because of its access to multi-disciplinary capability and its stated objectives of being user (societal, human impact) driven. It was also noted that the UNESCO Science Programme is actively engaged with ICSU in this area. The TOWS-WG committed to investigating the potential for engaging ICSU on this aspect, drawing particular attention to the needs of Small Islands Developing States in the Caribbean and South Pacific. Action: TOWS-WG and Secretariat, in concert with the Ocean Sciences Section. The TOWS-WG further noted the need for enhanced attention to ecosystem observations to support coastal hazard studies and vulnerability and post-hazard assessment programs. It agreed to bring this need to the attention of GOOS (also see the discussion under the GOOS report for agenda Item 3.1). Action: IGOOS Capacity building and coastal hazards There was also a related discussion on capacity building, with particular reference to the work of the Capacity Building Programme in support of coastal hazards arising from tsunami. The TOWS-WG agreed that the needs of small island developing states should be specifically identified, noting statements and decisions of the IOC that specifically related to this issue. It was agreed that there was potential for ISDR and its partner UN bodies to be engaged in such activities, particularly in regard to community responses. This engagement would be best handled on a multi-hazard basis with identification of the specific capability that IOC could bring to such a programme of work as well as the needs that require ISDR involvement. Action point: IOC CB Programme and Secretariat Bathymetry The TOWS-WG noted the many references to the need for high-resolution bathymetric data and digital elevation models, particularly in relation to coastal hazards and tsunami inundation modelling. The issue has been raised at the Executive Council and Assembly, and the International Hydrographic Organization has offered to assist. The IOC co-sponsors and coordinates efforts towards the mapping of the world ocean's floor (e.g. bathymetric charts, geological/geophysical maps), including through the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO) initiative. A number of Member States have supported specific actions to improve bathymetric data in the coastal region. Notwithstanding this work, the TOWS-WG formed the view that the IOC should be encouraging even greater effort, with the ultimate objective of assisting all Member States in obtaining adequate bathymetric data, particularly in relation to coastal hazards. To the extent that it is practical and is contributing to the international effort to mitigate the effects of natural disasters, such data should be made available in line with IOC Data Policy. Action: TOWS-WG Telecommunications The TOWS-WG noted there remains a need to establish common practices and protocols for exchanging and accessing information provided through various communication systems. The TOWS-WG agreed to initially develop a set of requirements, from the perspective of its mandate; that is, spanning all tsunami regions and embracing other hazard requirements, as appropriate. This will include how to access GTS information and the issue of access beyond the NMHSs. This analysis will be provided to WMO through JCOMM. Action: TOWS-WG and JCOMM Capacity Building, Education and Training In this case the TOWS-WG is considering aspects (requirements) that transcend at least the boundaries of ICG scope, and usually the boundaries of the IOC itself. First, it concluded that the Capacity Building Programme should be fully engaged to ensure, first, that solutions are efficient, effective and sustainable within the context of IOCs overall action plan, and second, that the engagement with external partners, particular through ISDR and including joint actions with WMO, is optimised to ensure ISDR and its UN partners see IOC and the ICGs speaking (acting) as one, and that ISDR in turn can optimise its role as a conduit for funding/donor support in response to IOC/ICG needs. While there may be a case for direct engagement of ISDR/funders at a regional level (e.g., within the context of the Indian Ocean Consortium), general it is more efficient and practical for all parties to focus actions and dialogues at a higher level. Such a strategy will reduce inefficiencies when opening up dialogues with potential funders and reduce the risk of conflicts. The TOWS-WG noted that it must be prepared to play a lead role in developing a statement of requirement. Action: TOWS-WG, Capacity Building Program, ISDR Tsunami and other hazard information sources The TOWS-WG agreed in principle that Tsunami and other hazard information and communication development, such as has been provided through ITIC, should be coordinated at a level spanning all ICGs. While this does not proscribe the creation of regional tsunami information centres, it does suggest that they should be working to a shared strategy and objectives, to avoid duplication and inconsistency, and to introduce efficiencies and enhanced capacity as a whole. Resolution of the role of ITIC, and other tsunami information units, was needed. Action: TCU High-level coordination and governance The co-Chairs introduced the item and noted the need for coordination of reporting and interactions with the governing body. While all primary subsidiary bodies like the ICGs are required to report to their governing body, the demand to participate in the Executive Council and Assembly as well as meet normal demands of the ICG can be onerous. Moreover, with four separate reports, and now input (advice) from the TOWS-WG, there is a significant risk of inconsistent decisions and inefficient operation of the governing body. It is within the Member States collective interests, both as members of the ICGs and as Member States of the IOC, to ensure the interactions with the governing body deliver consistent and efficient decision making and that the work of the ICGs is not delayed or hampered by indecision. Acting as one at the level of the IOC has obvious advantages. The co-Chairs invited views from the Secretariat who are directly impacted by these circumstances. From their perspective, the ICGs should take more direct responsibility for decision making, which in turn implies ICG sessions that are better prepared and clearer in terms of their programme of work, needed resources, and decisions. Clearly streamlining of the information brought to the governing body would be advantageous, particularly if it removed or reduced the risk of ill-informed decisions. With reference to the Terms of Reference of the TOWS-WG, there seemed some potential for the TOWS-WG to assist in making both the reporting and decision making more efficient. The TOWS-WG drew a number of conclusions. Modus operandi of ICGs Quite clearly, the operation of the ICGs is determined by the Rules of Procedure of the IOC and the Resolution of the IOC that created them. It is anticipated that work will continue during intersessional periods, guided by the agreed plans and assisted by the Secretariat, as appropriate. The Chair has an important role, particularly in areas where agreed guidance/decisions are lacking and timely progress is needed. Many primary subsidiary bodies use their elected office bearers as an executive group, to assist and advise the Chair. In other cases, Boards or similar groups have been appointed by the Primary Subsidiary body. The TOWS-WG noted that the inter-sessional pressures for ICGs are particularly intense since development and implementation is moving rapidly and the Chair is frequently required to approve intersessional and preliminary actions. To the extent that other mechanisms are in place to assist in this approval process, it is important that they are formally agreed and endorsed by the ICGs, with clear terms of reference. It is also important to note that only the Chair is empowered to make decisions and approve actions, and that the Chair is ultimately accountable to the ICG itself. The ICG has primacy. The TOWS-WG also noted the responsibility of the ICGs for developing and agreeing strategic plans and programmes of work, consistent with the over-arching high-level objectives of the IOC and in-synch with the biennial planning schedule. The ICGs are also responsible for agreeing and coordinating the resources needed to execute the programme of work, and for monitoring progress. In these respects, the TOWS-WG believes it would be advantageous to have standing items on each ICG agenda to ensure proper attention was given to these matters. Success will be determined by and large by the degree to which the ICGs themselves can mobilise programme resources and additional Secretariat support, and not by the regular programme budget which is generally a small fraction of the total. Secretariat To the extent that the work plan requires Secretariat support, the ICGs should provide clear guidance on priority, to guide the Secretariat in its appropriation of regular programme support. Extra-budgetary resources and in-kind contributions can be generated and assigned by the ICG itself, thus facilitating flexibility and degree of autonomy. Decisions of the Executive Council Matters related to regular programme budget must be brought to the governing body (Assembly, EC) for decision. The decisions relate to priority and the relative investment against strategic high-level objectives and outcomes, not to the details of the work programme of the Secretariat or to specific allocations. The formal Reports to the governing body are mostly for noting; the ICGs are empowered to make decisions within their mandate and terms of reference and do not have to have these decisions ratified. The TOWS-WG noted the intent to harmonise reporting for all primary subsidiary bodies through a common template that would include, among other things, details of progress against the agreed programme and expected results. For the ICGs and their dialogue with external agents like ISDR, it is highly desirable to include a status report for the TWS (that is, progress against the expected result for HLO 1). In some areas, like the adoption of standards or procedural guidelines it is advantageous to have these agreed at the level of the Governing Body, and to apply them as far as possible to all regions. It is also useful in most instances to have work/links with other bodies of the IOC harmonised through decisions of the Governing Body, in order to avoid multiple lines of engagement on similar topics. In particular where action is required by another subsidiary body, such instruction should be harmonised and coordinated through a decision of the Governing Body, generally taking account of the interests of the ICGs and IOC as a whole. In principle at least, the TOWS-WG could play a role in this harmonisation and streamlining, acting as a filter for matters brought to the Governing Body. The TOWS-WG agreed to seek endorsement from the Executive Council for such a role. At its annual meeting, and prior to the meeting of the Governing Body (see ToR, Attachment 1), the TOWS WG would review the Reports of all ICGS and any other matters being brought to the Governing Body for decision within the mandate and scope of the TOWS-WG. To the extent possible, the input to the Governing Body would be rationalised and streamlined so that only those matters requiring decision were tabled, and in such a way as to harmonise the work of the Commission and introduce consistency. To the extent it assisted decision making, the ICGs and other relevant bodies would be invited to talk to particular matters. The TOWS-WG noted the benefits of visibility of the TWS subsidiary bodies and that the role of the TOWS-WG should not interfere with or dilute accountability and ownership of TWS work programmes and associated Reports. Working Groups There is a general concern that the creation of Working Groups under each ICG, all dealing with similar matters and often calling on the same capability for advice and input, is not fully efficient. Moreover, where Working Groups are working in similar areas, such as standards, the terms of reference are often sufficiently different as to lead to different outputs and outcomes, making the task of harmonisation and integration more difficult. The TOWS-WG agreed that a review of the Work Group arrangements is timely. It recognizes the power accorded to ICGs to create secondary subsidiary bodies and that whatever advice that might be developed is not intended to interfere with this mandate and responsibility. The TOWS-WG will be seeking routes to greater efficiency and effectiveness, for the ICGs, for ocean-related hazard activities more generally, and for the IOC. In particular it will look for: Areas where the work can now be, or soon could be undertaken within another subsidiary body with capability and expertise in the area, and able to address the collective (global) needs rather than on a region by region basis. The consolidation of sea level work under GLOSS is an example. Areas where the tasks remain specific to tsunami warning but are at a level of maturity where they would be better managed through a single working group spanning all regions rather than several working groups with mandates confined to a particular region. The development of standards is an example where we expect such consolidation. Areas where there is a legitimate, on-going need for work specific to a region, but for which there are advantages in having that work harmonised. In this case, the TOWS-WG believes harmonised terms of reference, much as has been achieved for the ICGs themselves, would deliver greater consistency. In yet other cases, there may be a requirement for intersessional work. This will be decided on a case-by-case basis by the ICGs themselves. Mechanisms for collaboration with external communities There are important interactions beyond the IOC, particularly with the seismic community, with WMO and with ISDR. As is evidenced by the conclusion under Item 4, the TOWS-WG believes this could be more effective if the interactions and communication were largely managed at the level of IOC rather than by the ICGs. This implies an important role of the IOC Secretariat, as well as the TCU, and perhaps also for the TOWS-WG. The conclusions under Item 4 suggest: Capacity building and interactions with ISDR should be coordinated through the Capacity Building Program. This does not proscribe initiatives at the regional level and by ICGs, but does suggest the ICGs should avail themselves of the expertise, capability and methodologies established by the CB Programme and contributed to an integrated whole-of-IOC approach. The TOWS-WG believes interactions with ISDR, its partner UN bodies, and other donors and funders would be more effectively managed in this way. Observations and services should, to the extent possible and where appropriate be consolidated within those subsidiary bodies with expertise and capability in these areas. This is happening now. It implies a shift to specification of requirements rather than hands-on development and implementation, but not totally. It also implies harmonised engagement with these bodies and integration, and focusing engagement with external bodies like WMO through JCOMM and GOOS. Scientific development might also benefit from greater engagement of, and with, the Ocean Sciences Program. The potential is greatest in the area of coastal hazards and the TOWS-WG recognizes that some R&D may be best led by the ICGs (the ICGs are not constrained to deliver outputs only in one area). For coastal hazards generally, external partners may include ICSU and SCOR, WMO/WWRP (for extreme weather and surges), WCRP (for climate-related hazards), IGBP and IUGG. High-level Coordination of Funding The co-Chairs provided a broad introduction to the issues, many of which were touched on under other items. They again invited Secretariat comment, which focused on: The importance of extra-budgetary resources and the impact of UNESCO rules; Greater use of regional subsidiary bodies; and The creation of special accounts, such as by ICG/CARIBE-EWS. The TOWS-WG concluded: The simplest thing that can be done is to ensure that tsunami and other hazards are effectively represented in the IOC plans, with good indicators of progress toward the expected results, and thus reinforcing and supporting the business case for investment in the TOWS-related activities. The special accounts have attractions because of their closer relation to the goals of the (regional) activities. However, the attraction for investing in this mode is sometimes dulled by the desire to have more direct control and accountability. ICG secretariat and other support should be targeted and focussed on the highest priorities. Member State investment in programmes is critical and, in principle, members of the ICGs should be prepared to support their own participation (notwithstanding the broader IOC goals related to WSSD, the MDGs, SIDS, etc.) Partnerships and donor relationships work best if we are Acting as one within TOWS scope, and IOC, as we build partnerships, with IOC being accountable for its commitments and being willing to execute its programme in partnerships This is also important for working with ISDR and its UN partners. We are arguing that we should present a single face as far as possible, putting the collective interest ahead of the self interest. We have an advantage that we have a good and effective CB&T approach, and that if this can be used more pro-actively, we can both encourage greater and more productive partnerships through ISDR and other mechanisms. Being clear on where IOC should lead, and where others have the lead. REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COUNCIL The report to the Executive Council will include a final GOHWMS Framework Document and the Report from this session of the TOWS-WG. The focus of the Report will be actions agreed under Item 4 and the suggested approach to governance and funding discussed under Items 5 and 6, respectively. The TOWS-WG members agreed to circulate an initial draft immediately after the meeting with a view to finalizing the TOWS-WG Report by 18 April. This will allow timely transmission of advice to the members of the Executive Council. OTHER ISSUES Membership With the exception of ICAM Programme representation, the TOWS-WG believes the current membership is appropriate and is not seeking any variation. Chiles membership remains unconfirmed. The co-Chairs noted the difficulty for ICGs to participate fully in this meeting but anticipate less difficulty in the future. Date and Place of the Next Meeting It would appear all ICGS will have met at least once more by early April 2009, so the next TOWS-WG meeting will be scheduled for April or early May 2009, noting the proposal for the TOWS-WG to have an explicit role in the transmission of items related to TOWS into the agenda of the Assembly. In this case, some leeway will be required. The place will be Paris unless an effective alternative is identified. CLOSURE OF MEETING The meeting closed at 15:25 on Friday 4 April. ANNEX i AGENDA OPENING AND WELCOME OPENING ADOPTION OF AGENDA WORKING ARRANGEMENTS BACKGROUND REVIEW OF WORK OF GOHWMS REVIEW RESOLUTION 14 FROM IOC XXIV CONTEXT WITHIN IOC/UNESCO REVIEW OF ISSUES FROM RELEVANT BODIES As per Resolution XXIV-14, for tsunami and sea-level related hazards, to include Standards for observations Data management Communication Forecast/warning practices Capacity building and outreach Areas where body might lead coordination ISSUES FROM PERSPECTIVE OF ICGS Pacific Ocean Indian Ocean Caribbean NE Atlantic and Mediterranean OTHER IOC BODIES I-GOOS JCOMM IODE OTHER EXTERNAL BODIES WMO ISDR Other REVIEW OF REPORTS WELL-DEFINED COMMON CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GLOBAL SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS [strengths for which little additional coordination is required] GAPS (IN COORDINATION OF COVERAGE), WITH ORDER OF PRIORITY OPPORTUNITIES FOR STRENGTHENED COORDINATION HIGH-LEVEL COORDINATION AND GOVERNANCE FOR TWS Coordination of Reporting to the Governing Body Adoption of ICG Resolutions Acting as one (focal points for coordination) HIGH-LEVEL COORDINATION OF FUNDING EXTERNAL INVESTMENT IN TSUNAMI SYSTEMS AND COORDINATION FUNDING FOR IOC TOWS ACTIVITIES ACTING AS ONE WITHIN UNESCO STRATEGY REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OTHER ISSUES MEMBERSHIP DATE AND PLACE OF THE NEXT MEETING CLOSURE OF MEETING ANNEX ii Terms of Reference of the Working Group on Tsunamis and Other Hazards Related to Sea-Level Warning and Mitigation Systems (TOWS-WG) Mandate 1. The TOWS-WG will: Advise on co-ordinated development and implementation activities on warning and mitigation systems for tsunamis and other hazards related to sea level of common priority to all ICG/TWSs, with special emphasis on: harmonization and standardization of relevant observation, data management and communication, forecast and warning practices development of synergies in capacity-building and outreach activities reinforcement of intergovernmental, international and national capabilities on hazard knowledge, vulnerability, and impact assessment effective coordination with all related subsidiary bodies, experts groups and partner organizations with relevant mandates. Report to the IOC Executive Council and Assembly on these common activities and propose new actions, as required. Advise the IOC Executive Council and Assembly regarding: instructions to the relevant subsidiary bodies responsible for coordinating the implementation of TOWS-WG actions; and any liaison or consultation required with relevant international and intergovernmental stakeholders in implementing TOWS-WG actions not under the unique mandate of IOC 2. The TOWS-WG shall review and provide guidance on establishing the framework mechanism for a comprehensive, sustained and integrated end-to-end global system covering tsunami and other hazards related to sea level, exploiting existing IOC mechanisms, capacities and capabilities, and facilitating priority projects and programmes, in alignment with the IOC Strategic Plan and IOC Executive Council decisions and in coordination with relevant stakeholders. Membership and modus operandi The membership of the TOWS-WG will be constituted by: The Chairpersons of the four ICG-TWSs, and of I-GOOS, JCOMM, IODE Three Members of the IOC Executive Council, nominated by the Chairperson, taking into account geographical distribution High-level representatives invited from the key TOWS-WG stakeholders in disaster risk reduction outside IOC, including WMO and other ISDR System members, FDSN/GSN, and other relevant intergovernmental and international agencies Appointed members of the Executive Council may be re-appointed for a second two year term The TOWS-WG shall be chaired by one of the Vice-Chairpersons of IOC and co-chaired by one of the Chairpersons of an IOC Subsidiary Body, on the recommendation of the Chairperson of the Commission after consultations with the IOC Officers. The TOWS-WG shall meet once a year, prior to the IOC Executive Council or the Assembly. The IOC Executive Secretary shall provide the secretariat for the TOWS-WG. ANNEX Iii LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Dr Thorkild Aarup Programme Specialist 1 rue Miollis 75732 Paris cedex 15 France Tel: +33 1 45 68 40 19 Fax: +33 1 45 68 58 12 Email: t.aarup@unesco.org Dr. Keith ALVERSON Head of Section, Ocean Observations and Services Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1 rue Miollis 75732 Paris cedex 15 France Tel: +33 1 45 68 40 42 Fax: +33 1 45 68 58 13 Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:k.alverson@unesco.org" k.alverson@unesco.org Dr Candyce CLARK NOAA/CPO Climate Observation Division 1100 Wayne Avenue, suite 1202 Silver Spring, MD 20910 United States Tel: +1 301 427 2463 Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:candyce.clark@noaa.gov" candyce.clark@noaa.gov Dr Stefanie DANNENMANN Programme Officer UN/ISDR - Platform for the Promotion of Early Warning UN Campus, Hermann Ehlers Str. 10 D-53113 Bonn Germany Tel: +49 228 815 0304 Fax: +49 228 815 0399 Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:dannenmann@un.org" dannenmann@un.org Dr Peter DEXTER Co-president of JCOMM Ocean Services Section Bureau of Meteorology GPO Box 1289 Melbourne VIC 3001 Australia Tel: 0061396694870 Fax: 0061396694695 Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:p.dexter@bom.gov.au" p.dexter@bom.gov.au Mr Franois Grard Chair I-GOOS Board CGPC-S2 Tour Pascal B 92055 La Dfense Cdex France Tel: +33 1 4081 2388 E-mail:  HYPERLINK "mailto:%66%72%61%6e%63%6f%69%73.%67%65%72%61%72%64@%64%65%76%65%6c%6f%70%70%65%6d%65%6e%74-%64%75%72%61%62%6c%65.%67%6f%75%76.%66%72" francois.gerard@developpement-durable.gouv.fr Dr David GREEN NOAA National Weather Service 1325 East West Hwy, SSMC2 Rm 15426 Silver Spring MD 20910 United States Tel: +1 301 713 3557 x 172 Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:david.green@noaa.gov" david.green@noaa.gov Dr Lorna INNISS Coastal Zone Management Unit Bay Street, St. Michael Barbados Tel: +246 228-5950 Fax: +246 228-5956 Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:linniss@coastal.gov.bb" linniss@coastal.gov.bb Dr Peter KOLTERMANN Head of Section, Tsunami Unit Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1 rue Miollis 75732 Paris cedex 15 France Tel: +33 1 45 68 40 15 Fax: +33 1 45 68 58 10 Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:p.koltermann@unesco.org" p.koltermann@unesco.org Dr Neville Smith Deputy Director Bureau of Meteorology Vice-chairman of IOC Melbourne VIC 3001 Australia Tel: +61 3 96 69 44 44 Fax: +61 3 96 69 4548 E-mail:  HYPERLINK "mailto:%6e.%73%6d%69%74%68@%62%6f%6d.%67%6f%76.%61%75" n.smith@bom.gov.au Dr Gerassimos PAPADOPOULOS 1 S. Marouli, Aghia Paraskevi, Athens Greece Tel: +30210-3490165 Fax: +30210-3490165 Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:g.papad@gein.noa.gr" g.papad@gein.noa.gr KJ RAMESH Advisor Ministry of Earth Sciences Mahasagar Bhavan, CGO Complex, Lodi Road New Delhi 110003, India Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:kj.ramesh@nic.net" kj.ramesh@nic.net Dr Ulrich Wolf Programme Specialist Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1 rue Miollis 75015 Paris France Tel: +33 1 45 68 39 29 Fax: +33 1 45 68 58 10 Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:u.wolf@unesco.org" u.wolf@unesco.org Masahiro YAMAMOTO Senior Advisor Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1 rue Miollis 75732 Paris cedex 15 France Tel: +33 1 45 68 39 60 Fax: +33 1 45 68 58 10 Email:  HYPERLINK "mailto:m.yamamoto@unesco.org" m.yamamoto@unesco.org ANNEX IV Framework for the Global Tsunami and other Ocean-related Hazards Early Warning System EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A synopsis is provided of the current capability and status of the tsunami warning and mitigation systems and the multi-hazard and disaster risk reduction needs, in the context of a potential comprehensive, integrated and fully operating global ocean-related hazard warning and mitigation system. The rationale for IOC leading the development of a global ocean-related hazard warning and mitigation system is presented, building from the four defined tsunami warning systems for the Indian Ocean, Pacific Ocean, Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean Seas and the Caribbean. The advantages of a multi-hazard approach are exposed, with emphasis on hazards contributing to changes in sea level and coastal inundation. A system of systems concept is outlined, with partnerships with other agencies with responsibilities in this domain. The ultimate objective is a global system of approved specific characteristics and common protocols, and which is operated by adequately trained, equipped and supported national systems for preventing coastal inundation hazards from becoming high impact disasters; An outline of the characteristics of the hazards contributing to coastal inundation is provided, together with typical actions at the national and regional level and options for mitigation. The elements of a systematic approach are described, including the needs for detection and prediction, data and information management, prevention, and education and capacity building. The principles underlying a framework are introduced and stakeholder interests are identified in the context of pursuing an end-to-end framework. The proposed way forward is built around the following principles: i) the strengthening of the synergies between the IOC and the other international actors; ii) a simple system of internal governance avoiding creating additional intergovernmental structures; iii) the protection of the user-oriented approach, which is the key to success of the warning systems for the natural hazards. The necessary observing and decision-making approaches associated with coastal exposure and vulnerability to inundation hazards are introduced with emphasis on harmonisation, standards and good practice. Significant conclusions are drawn in respect of sea-level observations, the coordination of relevant seismic data, the development and agreement of relevant standards (particularly in respect of outputs/services from the system), and coordination capacity building and relevant research. The approach to governance of such a system of systems are discussed, including a recommendation to create a subsidiary body with responsibility for advising on the development of a system to alleviate the serious risk (directly or indirectly) for human and ecosystem safety, health and sustainability. Introduction In response to the devastating tsunami of December 2004, the 23rd Assembly of UNESCOs Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) adopted resolutions formally establishing three Intergovernmental Coordination Groups (ICGs) to co-ordinate the development and operations of three new tsunami early warning and mitigation systems, in the Indian Ocean (IOTWS), the Caribbean and adjacent regions (CARIBE EWS), and the Mediterranean, North-East Atlantic, and Connected Seas (NEAMTWS). IOC has been mandated, to coordinate the establishment of the Indian Ocean system within a global framework during the course of many international and regional meetings including the World Conference on Disaster Reduction, Kobe, Japan, January 2005 and by the 61st UNGA, Resolution 44. This was based on the IOCs proven experience with the Pacific Ocean Tsunami Warning System (PTWS) initially operated since 1965 through the International Tsunami Coordination Group (ITSU). These decisions were complemented by a resolution establishing an ad-hoc working group for the Establishment of a Framework for the Global Tsunami and other Ocean-related Hazards Early Warning System (GOHWMS). The ad hoc Working Group (WG) of the GOHWMS held its first meeting during the 39th Session of the IOC Executive Council, Paris, 24 June 2006. It was also during this session that a resolution was adopted, renaming the International Tsunami Co-ordination Group/ITSU as the Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Pacific Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (ICG/PTWS). The GOHWMS WG was thus in the position to consider development and implementation of a global network of four regional tsunami warning and mitigation systems with associated ICGs, supported by the IOC Secretariat with new roles and responsibilities. The GOHWMS WG meeting was attended by participants from many IOC Members countries, stakeholder organizations including the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), and the Group on Earth Observations (GEO) and partner organizations within the IOC including the Intergovernmental Committee for the Global Ocean Observing System (I-GOOS), the Joint IOC/WMO Technical Commission on Oceanography and Marine Meteorology (JCOMM) and the Caribbean regional body (IOCARIBE). The WG provided two documents proposing partnership strategies and identifying benefits and opportunities for integration among the regional and national systems. The WG reviewed regional progress based on presentations solicited from the Chairs of the existing ICGs. The meeting concluded with a recommendation later encompassed in a decision of the 39th IOC-EC, which endorsed the GOHWMS Chair and Working Group and charged them to prepare a Framework document for adoption at the 24th IOC Assembly in June 2007. Rationale for a GOHWMS The IOC tsunami warning systems The IOC is tasked with coordinating the four tsunami warning and mitigation systems through the respective ICGs and with other international agencies and organizations. Currently, the global warning and mitigation system does not constitute a system of systems where the regional parts can work together to serve the needs of Member States. The development of these TWSs derives from a strategy based on a basin-focused approach, in relation with the communities at risk and accounting for regional characteristics. It acknowledges unique oceanographic, geophysical, technical, educational, cultural, and political interests. It can also identify and strengthen national systems and existing intergovernmental capacities available for integration into an end-to-end hazard warning and mitigation system. The relevance of the GOHWMS was in defining the conceptual framework for integration and guiding the long term assessment of future requirements serving Member States and organizations. These future needs drive present day strategic investments for operations, development and research, and promote collaboration on priorities and common objectives. The proposed GOHWMS framework will be dynamic and evolve to bridge cross-cutting perspectives of the ICGs and align actions and performance with measured results. This framework will be strategic, discouraging proliferation of too many initiatives with limited resources by promoting near term opportunities, analysis of system attributes and alternatives and optimize mobilization of resources for sustainable advisory and command structures.. All regional tsunami warning and mitigation systems require technical and secretariat support from IOC, other intergovernmental bodies, member states and local organizations. There exists a risk that a proliferation of diverging interests might make the system of systems less efficient. This does not mean that only one organizational body or one worldwide warning center is needed to do the job even if that were possible from a purely technical point of view. Other factors that play a critical role are national and local ownership, pre-existing regional constituencies, competition among stakeholders, capacity building initiatives and overlapping responsibilities. All the ICGs have formed Working Groups to develop, prioritize and execute plans that advance elements of the end-to-end approach: multi-hazard assessment and modelling, seismic monitoring, sea level and deep ocean observations, data management, warning and information generation and dissemination, preparedness, mitigation, and capacity development. Currently, each working group has drafted or is in the process of drafting action plans. The framework for these actions shall identify common tasks, flow and linkages and align schedules. It shall also promote performance indicators and clarify IOC responsibilities. These lead to agreeing on work plans for each system, based on common standards and targets. Developing synergies amongst regional systems can generate benefits through the use of common standards, access to and adoption of best practices and concepts for sustaining core observation stations and communication channels. Data exchange, warning standards, and dissemination, core objectives and goals should become more achievable and affordable. Each of the ICGs has recognized the need for integrating national tsunami warning and information dissemination centres into the optimal regional concept to meet their current and future requirements. Through building on existing capacities, the ICGs need to take into account civil defense authorities, meteorological services, geo-science ministries, academic institutions, as well as public-private consortia, and many others. Regional centres need to rapidly analyze data and make decisions that minimize impact, generate warning guidance and disseminate information. But because not every country has this capacity or the response system, the framework needs to identify policies, actions, and partnerships that will eliminate barriers and simplify this effort to assess, predict and inform. The framework must elevate the underlying synergies among these organizations including staffing, telecommunications, observational networks and platforms, data processing, response procedures, warning products, dissemination methods, focal points (recipients), operations and maintenance, and outreach and education. Similarly synergies need to be developed among different sub-regions, such as the small island states. Across all the ICGs there is common agreement to identify best system attributes and effective solutions for data management, robust telecommunications, affordable observing networks, trusted watches and warnings and all efforts to leverage resources ensuring continuity and avoiding duplication. However, there lacks a common mechanism to effectively and efficiently coordinate and subsequently collaborate on the data and information requirements of the stakeholder and user communities activities in a system of systems approach. Thus, all ICGs would accelerate achievements by intensifying their collaboration in defining criteria for hazard assessment, quality assurance of historical disaster catalogues, data transmission for sea level and seismic monitoring networks, robust and affordable telecommunications, common alerting protocols, and policies that facilitate cost sharing and joint investment. However, in a number of cases ICGs, countries or a group of countries within a region, have been slow in recognizing near-term opportunities such as those related to institutional and structural roles and responsibilities, which focus activities during and after hazard events. In some regions and nations there appears to be a disconnect among organization/ministry responsibility on coastal issues or natural versus man-made hazard issues. Similarly, at the UNESCO/IOC level there appears to be a learning curve on the synergy between science-based organizations and operational entities and the appropriate mid to long-term strategies for action. There are also differing opinions on how synergies between research organizations and operational organizations accelerate the transition of research results, linking observation and measurement with models to assess changes in susceptibility and resilience to coastal flooding in high risk regions and to forecast impacts on coastal populations, ecosystems and living resources. IOC through its members and coordinating groups has the near term opportunity to share data and decision tools for integration, analysis and modelling across the land-sea interface in multiple regions. Specifically, the global efforts can advance the state of coastal predictive models and identify what steps will be needed to enhance community resilience. It is important to recognize that the end-to-end approach of warning, mitigation, and dissemination does not mean everything is compartmentalized or sequential but rather within and across regions interoperability, standards, protocols, and multi-hazard approaches lend to synergistic long term and people-centred solutions. However, knowing what systems could benefit from enhanced integration to achieve the desired outcomes, where they should operate, when they need to perform, how they will be sustained, who are the stakeholders, and why the capabilities of the system fills the regional need are key questions that the framework must answer. IOCs success in providing global coverage and driving the multi-hazard approach to risk reduction must be augmented by seeking opportunities for developing synergies amongst regional ocean-related hazard warning and mitigation systems. Towards multi hazard system of systems The operational concept underlying the global tsunami warning and mitigation system and the strategy to harness synergies across regions contributes to the Global Earth Observing System of Systems (GEOSS). Developing synergies amongst regional hazard systems has underlined the urgent and imperative need for free and open exchange of data among countries and international organizations and the application of improved scientific methodologies and observational information for better decision-making, which are part of the mainstream GEOs objectives. The other big issue here is the "multi-hazard approach". Although from the delivery side, early warning for multiple hazards would benefit from integration and a community based approach, we must recognize that except for tsunamis most ocean related hazards which require immediate response are generated by dynamic ocean/air interactions. For such complex coupled systems specialized detection capabilities for measuring and monitoring are needed to readily detect emerging hazard threats. Such specialized detection systems cannot be used as the foundation blocks for a multi-hazard approach. However the supporters for specialized means of detection do not negate the entire concept because other warning system components could benefit from a multi-hazard approach, such as redundancy, reliability, resilience and cost effectiveness of infrastructure in the domains of information and communication technology and an increased level of 24/7 operational readiness and presence. For example, a case can be made for looking at synergistic inundation hazards and high impact events such as tsunami, storm surge, coastal flooding in the multi-hazard multi-sectoral approach. Underlying these hazards are many common observational platforms, databases, and methodologies for modelling and forecasting threats including alerting protocols such as the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) and response mechanisms. Integrating some of the related marine hazards has not received much attention and these are in fact extreme manifestation of ocean weather, for which GOOS will generate essential observations to advance risk detection and forecasting processes. Other marine ecosystem hazards are associated with coastal catchments and floodplains, posing risk for human and ecosystem health, directly through exposure to pollutants and pathogens, as well as indirectly e.g., harmful algal blooms. The decisions on how to develop ocean-related multi-hazard strategies either independently or with different stakeholders within the strengthened ISDR System including UNESCO, World Bank, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), UN Development Programme (UNDP), Office for the Coordination on Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and WMO. So the coordination process in establishing ocean-wide tsunami and other ocean-related hazards warning systems has been undertaken in close co-ordination and collaboration with the above mentioned UN bodies as well as in cooperation with UNESCOs unit on Natural Disaster Reduction. In particular there are a number of existing ocean-related hazards warning, mitigation, and dissemination systems that are being coordinated by IOC in partnership with other intergovernmental organizations providing operational and technical input, especially WMOs Disaster Risk Reduction Programme and through JCOMM. Why a GOHWMS? The risk of coastal inundation On the basis of this analysis, we propose defining the initial operational capability of the GOHWMS framework around the early warning and mitigation of coastal inundation created by sources including tsunami, tropical and extra-tropical storm surge, and strong swells.. These threats will likely be compounded by global change impacts in coastal systems including accelerated sea-level rise. Significant increases in coastal population and associated activities in coastal catchments and floodplains also lead to rapid and accelerating increases in loads of pollutants and pathogens that pose risk for human and ecosystem health. This choice is based on the consideration that inundation is the major risk that coastal communities are facing. It accounts the environmental, human and economic increasing pressure to which the coastal areas are subjected. It accounts also the fact that the sustainable development of the coastal communities appears among the Millennium Objectives. Accordingly, establishing the GOHWMS around coastal inundation will be a relevant contribution of IOC and of its partners to these objectives and to those of ISDR. Such a definition of GOHWMS is to be considered as a first step towards an initial operational capability and a more comprehensive system covering other ocean related risks. We note here risks linked to the green ocean, such as harmful algal blooms. The initial focus of the GOHWMS on coastal inundation enables near term opportunities building upon existing systems, existing practices and available knowledge. It also defines coherent scientific, technical, and educational project results. In addition, GOHWMS will contribute to and benefit from the GEO user interface mechanism known as Communities of Practice (CoP) that provide a systematic, targeted, focused and comprehensive engagement of users in the development and implementation of sustained global observing systems. Participation with CoPs concerned with geophysical hazards and integrated coastal area management will ensure that providers of data and information are involved and cooperate on specific high priority challenges facing disaster prevention and mitigation in coastal regions. A structuring approach Storm surges, strong swells and currents, resulting from atmospheric forcing phenomena, in principle may be predicted and detected with adequate lead time to generate effective warning guidance and to notify at-risk communities, since the forcing phenomena (tropical cyclones and storms) can be characterized and modelled. Tsunamis are a consequence of seismic, volcanic or geological hazards. In the current state of knowledge, these hazards are not foreseeable or predictable, but they are detectable. Early detection involves integrated data (observations) from seismic networks and arrays of deep ocean sensors and sea level gauges. Combined with propagation and digital elevation models, based on availability of adequate bathymetric and topographic data, site-specific forecasts of tsunami impacts and higher resolution regional warnings are becoming available. This is the main distinction from more traditional meteorological warning and mitigation systems, which has effects on the forecast and therefore warning chain, as summarised below: The forecast of the inundation related to storm surges or swells falls under the regular process of meteorologic and oceanographic event forecasting. The timely generation of guidance, dissemination of warnings and information, and the notification of emergency mangers, authorities and the public spans days to hours preceding the impact. The detection, warning, forecast, notification and education process is usually executed under the authority of a national hydrometeorological service (NHMS) and in some cases by oceanographic, naval or civil defense agencies. The intergovernmental organisations, IOC and WMO, through their intergovernmental subsidiary body JCOMM, coordinate, develop and recommend standards and procedures for a fully integrated marine observing, data management and services system that uses state-of-art technologies and capabilities. The forecast of the inundation related to tsunamis depends on the rapid detection of the forcing phenomena (earthquake, volcanic eruption, landslide), verification of the wave generation (deep sea and sea level data), and on the analysis of its tsunamigenic character. Detection initiates a first warning of an inundation hazard, that can be cancelled if no tsunami is detected. In the opposite case, one enters a deterministic process of forecast and warning for distant tsunami. But, if the tsunami is local, a different process has to be activated. These are the attributes that characterise the concept of operations and standard operating procedures developed for tsunami warning services in the Pacific Ocean system (PTWS). It remains to establish interoperable operations and services elsewhere. It is the current work of the IOC and of its partners, in particular the WMO, but more especially the communities of oceanographers, meteorologists, geophysicists and seismologists, emergency and coastal zone managers to address cross-cutting issues and ensure interoperability. The table 1 below gives an illustration on the above and highlights what is common to the four identified marine hazards forcing a coastal inundation. MARINE HAZARD TsunamiStorm surgeExtreme wind-forced wavesLong-term sea-level riseLikely frequency of eventDecades to millennia, depending on regional tectonic regimeMonths to decades, depending on regional climate regimeMonths to decades, depending on regional climate regimeOn-going, a consequence of global warming and local factorsType of impactCatastrophic inundation and drainage surges, perhaps multipleCatastrophic, single-event inundation Multiple, localized inundation and drainage surgesProgressive rise of mean high (tidal) water levelLimits of area likely to be affectedLocal run-up limit for specified wave amplitudes predicted by modellingFlood limit for specified surge level predicted by terrain modelling Flood limit for specified wave heights predicted by terrain modellingMean high water mark predicted by terrain modelling with allowance for extreme events Potential warning timeMinutes to hours, depending on proximity of source locationHours to days, depending on climatic factorsHours to days, depending on climatic factors Decades to centenniaAction by Regional Warning CentreIssuance of Watches, Advisories and Warnings to National CentresNo actionAction by National Warning Centre(s) Immediate transmission of Advisories and Warnings to appropriate Local AuthoritiesNo actionEmergency actions by Local AuthoritiesStand-by for emergency response action on receipt of AdvisoryNo actionLaunch of emergency response action on receipt of WarningMitigation by Local and National Authorities and stakeholdersVulnerability assessment of coastal populations, ecosystems, and infrastructure; Strategic spatial planning and regulation to minimize exposure and vulnerability: Participatory approach; Decision tools and software for analysing hazard loss and riskPublic awareness and readiness campaigns, including recognition programmes and emergency response exercises (preparedness) and education (preparedness and adaptation); Promoting community resilience.Table  SEQ "Tableau" \*Arabic 2: Characteristics of the hazards creating coastal inundation and common topics (Courtesy R. Arthurton WG4 of NEAMTWS) This being explained, we will focus on the coastal inundation, which makes it possible to identify common topics allowing to define the technical and institutional framework of the GOHWMS: detection, forecasting, warning, notification, education and training related to sea level abnormal variations. The framework will provide the strategic focus for data providers and users to identify necessary observing and decision-making approaches associated with coastal vulnerability to inundation. Detection: The warning system includes real-time monitoring (remote and in situ measurements) for the detection of the instantaneous high-impact events, long-term tracking of abnormal variations of the sea level, and archiving of historical events. This includes seismic (land and ocean bottom) for detection and sea level verification (deep ocean tsunameters and real-time tide gauges). It is essential for the verification of a tsunami besides the detection of tsunamigenic earthquakes by networks to assess and confirm changes for forecasting the potential impacts. It is necessary for the inundation (tsunami wave, storm surge, etc) as validating data for models and studies of susceptibility and reslience to coastal flooding in high risk regions. Detection is fundamental to initiate planning for data integration, analysis and modeling across the land-surface interface to understand links between hazards and climatic variability. The corresponding tool is a global sea level observation system providing the ocean monitoring and prediction capability for sea level changes and related research. Elements of this observation system exist as GLOSS within JCOMM under the framework of GOOS, and must be adapted to meet the requirements of the GOHWMS and the needs of the user community. The GOHWMS must also promote integration with the seismic network of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO), the Federation of Digital Seimograph Networks (FDSN) and the Global Seismic Network (GSN) among others. In general, IOC and WMO ocean observing systems are implemented and maintained in conformity with technical regulations, standards and best practices developed under JCOMM for operation in national Meteorological and Oceanographic Services. Forecast: Tsunamis and storm surges involve waves of long wavelength and forecasts can be made for high impact disasters at the land-sea interface. Magnitude and timescales for these events are substantially different depending on velocity and depth of the wave energy. A fundamental difference, assuming both events reach the same elevation is, in general the flow velocities in a tsunami tend to be much higher and can be associated with geophysical deformation. In a storm surge flow velocities are associated with surface wind waves propagating inland on top of the surge, and decrease in force and elevation as they move down from the sea surface. In the case of a tsunami, a water current 1 m in depth is still capable of considerable structural damage. Tsunamis which manifest as a rapidly rising sea level which come inland, and then recedes, may have lower velocities. The simulation and forecast models in both cases rely on accurate bathymetric and topographic data and digital elevation models. The commonalities in propagation models and the linkage to ocean and coastal models provides opportunities for exploiting synergy. It is possible that the implementation of these models may be available in the same or complementary forecast centres, benefiting meteorological, marine, and navigational services and leveraging expertise and experience to improve data availability and effectiveness of mulithazard forecasts. Elements of this forecast system for tropical cyclones, storm surges, wind waves, sea-level rise and coastal flooding exist in several WMO Programmes and its Technical Commissions, including the joint WMO/IOC Commission JCOMM. Data and Information Management: Requirements of the user groups: real-time responders, near-term post event builders, and longer-term planners, policy makers, researchers and eduators present a challenge for data and information exchange and mangement. Coastal inundation necessitates the real-time collection and timely dissemination of meteorological and sea level data, to which the seismic data is assimilated for the analysis of tsunamis and related hazards. Downstream, the dissemination of the warnings for the notification of emergency managers, authorities, and the public in a position to make critical decisions and take actions to save lives and property has to be carried out in an efficient and effective way. There are also requirements that the incoming and outgoing data and information be secure and archived. The development and use of standard data exchange, management and assimilation processes for data integration, analysis, modeling, communication and stewardship as well as common alerting protocols for dissemination of information and warnings is key to achieving measurable benefits from the GOHWMS. Prevention: The development of the risk prevention plans for coastal inundation, of the warning plans and of the corresponding rescue plans necessitates the preliminary knowledge of the submersible areas. The corresponding tools are models of coastal inundation needing to have adapted bathymetric databases and making it possible to evaluate and predict the transition through the coast line. Education: The essential element of the success of inundation disaster prevention and mitigation is the education and capacity building that promotes resilient communities. Training of system operators, responders, policy makers and the public in this end-to-end multihazard system must be strengthened to ensure effectiveness, continuity and sustainability. Ultimately the training must include outreach to the public and community leaders making critical real-time decisions so that lives are saved and economies protected for all global communities at risk. The framework of the GOHWMS Principles What we reviewed in the previous paragraphs makes it possible to propose a framework of development for the integrated system of warning and prevention of the coastal inundation caused by the Ocean. The proposed way forward is built around the following main principles: i) the strengthening of the synergies between the IOC and the other international actors; ii) a simple system of internal governance avoiding creating additional intergovernmental structures; iii) the protection of the user-oriented approach, which is the key to success of the warning systems for the natural hazards. It is excluded that the GOHWMS be thought or be presented as a centralised system dedicated to the risk of coastal inundation. A regional definition of the systems, close to the users, essential for the oceanic phenomena with coastal repercussions dependent on the local conditions, must be preserved. It is the fruitful step followed by the IOC for its tsunami warning systems and by the WMO for the tropical cyclones, storm surges and wind waves warning systems. At this point in time one must intervene to avoid parallel developments leading to redundancies and economic losses. The perspective is to identify the common problems to the regional warning systems and to propose the relevant organization GOHWMS will work, inventing new systems only in the event of noted lack. The creation of an additional level of management will therefore be avoided by building upon existing programmes and groups already established by the stakeholders. In summary, starting from the individual problem of the tsunamis, each ICG has to work only on the configuration of the system adapted to its region, and to coordinate its implementation. The ICG is therefore the authority defining the various elements of the system (observation, telecommunications, warnings). These specifications will have then to be analysed to identify what is specific and what can be entrusted to existing groups. It is at this level that the GOHWMS intervenes, to propose the guidelines. The GOHWMS will provide standards, develop common procedures and processes and include existing competent groups. WMO Congress noted and supported ongoing priority areas identified by JCOMM, including support for marine multi-hazard warning systems, within the context of the WMO priority area of disaster prevention and mitigation. Congress recognized that many of these areas could only be implemented through full and active cooperation and coordination between WMO and IOC. This coordination should commence initially with the IOC-ICG/IOTWS because needs for long term maintenance, data management and archiving have been articulated clearly by Members in that region. Stakeholders The attached schematic and table provides a first attempt at capturing the role and mandates of different stakeholders involved in various aspects of GOHWMS, in order to develop a system, roles and responsibilities and exiting operational capacities available through networks of different agencies. The initial stakeholders of the GOHWMS are IOC, WMO, ISDR, GEOSS and their subsidiary bodies, which cover the main part of the needs of the forecasts and warning system, and entities representing the seismic networks for what concerns the tsunami originating hazards. IOC: The Intergovernmental Oceanographical Commission (IOC) is mandated by the United Nations to define and coordinate the development and the implementation of the tsunami warning systems, with a view to inserting them in an overall multi-hazard system, the GOHWMS in question here. Within the IOC, this action is entrusted currently to four Intergovernmental Co-ordination Groups (ICG) responsible for four oceanic basins. The other programmes of IOC, GOOS for the observation, IODE for the data management, ICAM for the integrated management of the coastal areas, and Capacity building have the capacity and mandate to contribute to the GOHWMS. In the Joint IOC/WMO Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology issues of common responsibility are being addressed. (b) WMO: The World Meteorological Organisation, in particular through seven of its programmes, contributes directly and substantially to different aspects of GOHWMS: Marine Meteorology and Oceanography Programme, Tropical Cyclone Programme, Hydrology and Water Resource Programme, World Weather Watch Programme, Disaster Risk Reduction Programmes, Space Programme and Education and Training Programme. (c) ISDR: The International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR) is the programme of the UN with the responsibility of preparing the human communities to protect themselves against the risks, by presenting vigilance vis-a-vis the risks like an integral component of sustainable development, with the objective of reducing the economic, environmental and human impact due to natural and industrial risks. It has with its asset the Hyogo Declaration (January 2005), the organisation of conferences on early warning and the adoption of pilot projects on the matter. The ISDR establishing the link with NGOs active in prevention and the management of the disasters is therefore an essential partner of the GOHWS, in particular in the fields of education and of the preparedness of communities at risk. (d) GEOSS: The Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS), established in February 2005, has for its prime societal objective the prevention of the natural risks. The GOHWMS appears as such in the relevant part of the GEOSS work programme for 2007-2009, and the next ministerial meeting, in November 2007, expects results on the matter. In addition, the User Interface Committee defined the concept of Communities of Practices, making it possible to make all the participants working around a given subject to work together. A Community of Practice relating to the geohazards and coastal zone was therefore created, which will aid development of the GOHWMS. These are the principal organisations which can help in the development and the implementation of the early warning systems to the risks of coastal inundation. For tsunamis, which have a geophysical origin, it will also be necessary to work cooperatively with the international bodies representing the CTBTO International Monitoring System IMS and the research seismic networks including FDSN, GSN and national systems. Harmonisation, standardisation and practices The harmonisation, standardisation, the exchange of information and the promotion of the best practices are the first elements of the GOHWMS. Structures to do so exist within IOC, WMO and their subsidiary bodies and programmes. It remains to work with the geophysicists' community and, in this area, the use of GEO can prove fundamental, without forgetting the bottom-up approach arising from the setting up of the TWS. The GOHWMS at its start must build from two existing observation systems functioning on a global scale, the sea level observation system and the seismic observation systems. The sea level observation system has to be truly global, in the sense that it covers the ocean, the regional seas and the coasts, by using unified methods and standards allowing in particular the real time collection of the data. The majority of the elements of this network exist. The sea level observation system includes a network of deep ocean bottom pressure moorings for detecting tsunami signatures. Standards need to be closely coordinated with GLOSS and the Data Buoy Cooperation Panel under JCOMM. These groups were established to serve the needs of various project issues like climate change, study of tides, tsunami warnings, calibration of the satellite altimeters, etc. F The international coordination of the sea level observation system dedicated to the risks should be entrusted to GLOSS, under the joint responsibility of IGOOS for planning and JCOMM for the implementation. This may force to re-examine the GLOSS mandate, but it is imperative to have an integrated approach of all observations of the sea level. The seismic observation system adapted to the GOHWMS, functioning in real time, remains to be developed with the relevant communities and their international bodies. It is a current process within the framework of the definition of the TWS, but the responsibility for the IOC is to ensure overall consistency of it, in particular through the corresponding tasks identified in the GEOSS work programme for 2007 2009 F The IOC shall, with the appropriate international partners, work to define the relevant seismic observation network for tsunami warning which could then be incorporated into existing global seismic networks. Relevant arrangements with CTBTO are in place. This task appears explicitly in the 2007-2009 work programme of GEOSS (DI-06-02), which provides the framework of this action by associating the various communities in charge of the problem, in particular IGOS-P. The national weather services are centres of forecast and issuing warning for the storm surges and high swells. TWS have put or are setting up national tsunami warning centres, which are often hosted by weather services. It is therefore useful to consider their convergence in the long term towards single centres of warning to the coastal inundation, provided that it is relevant to the local conditions. Effective working relationships including the exchange of information between all warning centres responsible for forecast and warning of coastal inundation hazards must be coordinated to ensure convergence and optimization of sustainable methods and practices. The JCOMM already carries out this exchange within the framework of its services programme area concerning the marine multihazards including storm surges and strong swells. All programmes of the IOC play a role in training, education and outreach for establishing tsunami warning capabilities. The global network profits ad interim from the ongoing international tsunami warning and forecast services provided by the PTWS, especially the US Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC), the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), the US West Coast/Alaska Tsunami Warning Center (ATWC), and by the WMO through its network of National Hydro-Meteorological Services (NHMS) within the framework of the tropical cyclone programme. This includes finally the joint organization of forecast and warnings associating all the actors. F The IOC/WMO JCOMM and IOC s tsunami programme will initiate comparison of the standards for operation and standard operational procedures used in the information and warning systems that they coordinate. This must lead to the identification of the attributes for effective warning and mitigation systems and to recommendations on the requirements for interoperability among warning centres in the regions and across regions. This should include areas of responsibility covered by the existing centres and address roles and responsibilities in areas with inadequate services. The WMO Disaster Risk Reduction Programme and the ISDR will be associated with this process. One initial action shall be to define a common vocabulary/glossary related to the warning systems. External communication and development of capacities The GOHWMS has common objectives with the existing regional systems, which covers preparedness and the mitigation of the coastal inundation hazard through education and outreach. Education products are critically important to harmonising and sustaining effective ocean-related hazard warning and mitigation programs. How the GOHWMS moves forward on regional and global communication relies on greater efficiencies in developing and distributing communication and educational materials. This includes publishing news letters and guidance documents as well as hosting web sites. Joint coordination and support of intergovernmental hazard prevention and disaster risk reduction web sites enhances a common look and feel important for greater usability and extensibility. Joint ownership also promotes accessibility and ensures the context is correct and up-to date. This is especially important to have a GOHWMS strategy for posting critical information immediately following a high impact event including soliciting feedback from the general public. Sharing of material and practices has therefore to be envisaged, within the long term framework of the Capacity Building strategy of UNESCOs IOC, WMO and other members of the ISDR System. F The IOC will incorporate a programme concerning the GOHWMS into its Capacity Building Strategy, based on the requests of the ICGs and of the IOC/WMO JCOMM and the Commision for Hydrology of WMO. It will incorporate initially aspects: building local capacity and leadership through the oceanographic, seismologic, meteorological and hydrological communities and providing training for Tsunami Warning Focal Points (TWFP) with emphasis on operators' training. This programme will be developed jointly with the WMO and the ISDR. Research and development Research and development in support of the GOHWMS concerns mainly three subjects: detection (observation systems), prevention (preparation of the plans) and the forecast (propagation models). As detection and forecast are accounted above, focus shall be given to the prevention, which requires continuous effort of coastal modelling, which cannot be conducted by IOC only. F The IOC will work with the GEO coastal zone and geohazards communities of practice to define the framework for enabling increased access to coastal bathymetry and promoting coastal inundation-related mapping and modeling projects. 6. Organization within the IOC Existing bodies The organisation of the GOHWMS by the IOC appears explicitly in the work plan of GEOSS for 2007-2009, adopted in November 2006, through two tasks. The DI-06-04 task devoted to the global tsunami warning system, the results of which are awaited for the GEO meeting at ministerial level, in November 2007. The DI-06-08 task is devoted to the multi-risk approach. The proposals below can provide a reply to the questions raised by these two tasks. To manage the development of the GOHWMS within the framework defined above, it is not necessary to create new intergovernmental bodies within the IOC. The existing groups and committees, the qualified entities of the secretariat, correctly connected, are the tools of it. First, there are the primary subsidiary bodies of the IOC which can be involved to differing degree in the GOHWMS. Four ICG-TWS (Pacific, Indian, Caribbean, the NE Atlantic and Mediterranean). They have all in their mandate to supporting cross-cutting goals of IOC and make the connection among themselves, and, integrate with ocean-related hazards and observation systems, and for the Caribbean system with related multi-hazard systems. At their disposal are the ITIC and the already identified warning centres (PTWC, WC/ATWC and JMA). I-GOOS and its scientific steering committee, the GSSC, which works with the network of regional alliances (GRA), their systems and their needs, to define and develop GOOS in direct link with the usesrs, amongst them, the TWS. JCOMM, the Joint Technical Commission of IOC and WMO. It has JCOMMOPS; the structure of information and of coordination on the implementation of the in situ networks. It is tasked with the coordination of the practices as regards observation and oceanic services, the latter point being central to the development of the GOHWMS. It is therefore the JCOMM, which will establish the practical link with the relevant programmes of the WMO. IODE, which controls projects like ODIN and developed tools like Ocean Teacher, of direct use to the development of the GOHWMS. IOC/ABE-LOS, expert advisory group on the Law of the Sea, an aspect which is not to be neglected when one is concerned about prevention of the coastal risks. The five regional subsidiary bodies of the IOC (IOCARIBE, IOCEA, IOCINDIO, IOCWIO and WESTPAC), which represent the interests of Member States of the IOC in a given region, and have therefore capacity of initiative as regards to warning systems may also play a role in the system. Let us note on this subject that the ICG/CARIBE-EWS develops, with clear support and linkages with IOCARIBE and that WESTPAC is at the origin of some GOOS regional alliances (GRA). The IOC has therefore the structures able to support the development of the GOHMS. It remains to organise their joint work. Figure  SEQ "Figure" \*Arabic 1: The topics covered by GOHWMS and by the ICGs `a ػ}i}XG6G6% htyhR CJ OJQJ^JaJ htyhCJ OJQJ^JaJ htyh^CJ OJQJ^JaJ htyh?eCJ OJQJ^JaJ &htyhR 5CJ(OJQJ\^JaJ &htyh5CJ(OJQJ\^JaJ &htyh^5CJ(OJQJ\^JaJ *htyh5@CJ8OJQJ\^JaJ88htyhR 5@CJ8OJQJ\^JaJ8hmHnHuAjhtyh5@CJ8OJQJU\^JaJ8hmHnHu htyh+`        ? t  ! " # $ % & $a$$a$$a$ $(](a$"! 3LTZ  t    % & ' 6 7 > @ ˵yhWE>70 htyh8CP htyh?e htyhR "htyh5OJQJ\^JaJ$ htyhR CJ OJQJ^JaJ htyh?eCJ OJQJ^JaJ &htyhR 5CJ(OJQJ\^JaJ &htyh5CJ(OJQJ\^JaJ &htyh?e5CJ(OJQJ\^JaJ *htyh5@CJ8OJQJ\^JaJ88htyhR 5@CJ8OJQJ\^JaJ8hmHnHu htyh htyhCJ OJQJ^JaJ & ' 7 L _ ` a b t < b  ?s  $a# gd $a# hxgd  $a# hgd  $a# gd $a$gd hgd5#.#@ A F J K ] ^ b t x y ļs]s;Cjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuh5;hmHnHsH uhjhU hh5CJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJ j*htyh8CP0J htyh?e htyh βΔbEb-/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:j}hh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu2hh0JCJOJQJ\^JaJmHnHu       6 7 8 ѯx`D`&D:jwhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu2hh0JCJOJQJ\^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu 8 9 : ; < = > Z [ \ ] p ϲ}g}E+2hh0JCJOJQJ\^JaJmHnHuCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu p q r ̙|_|G1G+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jqhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu   T V X \ ^ ` b rTr?r"8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jkhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu2hh0JCJOJQJ\^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu b d f   ˵˓v^B^$:jehh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH uCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu       L N P R V X l n p 㱔|f|D||,.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHuCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHup ʮ|_|G1G+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu:j_hh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu 9:;<=>?uYu;Y&Y(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jYhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu?@A]^_`cd˵˓x`D`&D:jShh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH uCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuϲiG//.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHuCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu  &'()+ƱƔyaKa)aCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu:jMhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu +,QRSmnopqrstu˳ydGG1+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jG hh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH uuYu;Y&Y(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jA hh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuCj hh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu234˵˓x`D`&D:j; hh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH uCj hh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu456789:VWXY\]rstϲiG//.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHuCj hh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8uPg&g=D  $a# gd  $a# hgd $a# hxgd  $a# gdƱƔyaKa)aCj hh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu:j5 hh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu ˳ydGG1+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:j/ hh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u"#STUopqrstuuYu;Y&Y(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:j)hh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuCj hh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphuuvw˵˓x`D`&D:j#hh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH uCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu./0JϲiG//.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHuCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHuJKLMNOPQRnopqtuƱƔyaKa)ayaCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu̙|a|I3I+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu uYu;Y&Y(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu !"%&EFGabc˵˓x`D`&D:j hh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH uCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHucdefghiϲiG//.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHuCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHuƱƔyaKa)ayaCjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu !#$%&'(DE̙|a|I3I+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu EFGJK]^_yz{}~uYu;Y&Y(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuCj|hh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu˵˓x`D`&D:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH uCjvhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuDEF`ϲiG//.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHuCjphh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu`abdefghiƱƔyaKa)aCjjhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu ˳ydGG1+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u678:;<sWs9W$W(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuCjdhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu <=>?[\]^`a|}~ƮvƮ^B^7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHuCj^hh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u ƱƔw_I_'_wCjXhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuϳϕcFc0+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu!"#=>?ABCDuYu;Y&Y(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuCjRhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphuDEFbcdehi˵˓x`D`&D:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH uCjLhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHuϲiG*8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH uCjFhh&U{B*CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHphu+hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu/hh0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu ̙|_T9",jhh5CJOJQJU^JaJ5hh;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH uh0JmHnHu8hh5;CJOJQJ^JaJhmHnHsH u8jhh0JCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu(h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu:jhh&U{CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu7jhhCJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu.hhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu *+,-?'%)&)')䕎tcTK>htyhrhf5;CJ\htyhR CJhhR OJQJ^JaJ hhR CJOJQJ^JaJ%hh ja5;OJQJ\^JaJ htyhRO htyh=t! hhCJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJh&U{CJOJQJ^JaJ h&U{h&U{CJOJQJ^JaJh=t!CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ+,-?zk!t"d$%'' $`a$gdR $a$gdg@&gd a# ;^`;gd a# ;^`;gd&U{ a# gd'%)&)9))*,r./?134578:,;<<=>@B $`a$gdtt $`a$gdR $a$gdg@&gd $@&a$gdR $@&`a$gdR ')9)B-L-1/4/002 2/4847799::<<<<QQR(RnU1htyhttB*CJOJQJ^JaJmHphsH%hh'95;OJQJ\^JaJhtyhrhf5;\(hhttCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH %hhl5;OJQJ\^JaJhtyhS5;CJ\htyho<mH sH htyhR mH sH (htyhR CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH %hho<5;OJQJ\^JaJB:DE.HGIKRLN9OQR4SUX[^|`egl nstww $a$gdg@&gd $`a$gdtt(R>R\ShS&6&cфU}ͻ͈veveveveveveveve htyh '/CJOJQJ^JaJ#htyh '/5CJOJQJ^JaJ htyh '/(h9x5CJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu,jhhc5CJOJQJU^JaJ#hhc5CJOJQJ^JaJ hhcCJOJQJ^JaJ hh '/CJOJQJ^JaJ hhcOCJOJQJ^JaJ#$>z7+++ $$$Ifgdckd@$$IfTqrU# z `````2#$44 lap2T&'6t΁Wkd $$IfT&rU# z  #$44 lap T $$$Ifgdc&n@cWWWWW $$$Ifgdckdp!$$IfTOrU# z  #$44 lap T!NccWWWWW $$$IfgdckdU"$$IfTrU# z  #$44 lap TcdDŽфcWWW $$$Ifgdckd:#$$IfTOrU# z  #$44 lap Tф҄KUsggg $$$Ifgdckd$$$IfTqF# " ̙̙#$    44 lap̙̙TUV}Ņsggg $$$Ifgdckd%$$IfTF# " ̙̙#$    44 lap̙̙TŅA~_Ok6H@I‘2@678յծyeeS#hh;CJOJQJ^JaJ&hhc6CJOJQJ]^JaJ#hhc5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhc6CJOJQJ^JaJ hhcCJOJQJ^JaJ htyh '/hCJOJQJ^JaJ#htyh '/5CJOJQJ^JaJ htyh '/CJOJQJ^JaJ1htyh '/CJOJQJ^JaJfHq ŅƅDžpg[g $$$Ifgdc $Ifgdckd%$$IfT4F#` "` ̙̙#$    44 laf4p̙̙TA;pddd $$$Ifgdckd&$$IfT4zF#  "  ̙̙#$    44 laf4p̙̙T;<=y $$$Ifgdc $Ifgdcpkd'$$IfT40#`  #$44 laf4pT_O6rbbbb]gdc$ & F*$G$a$gdV1$ & F*$G$a$gdV1.gdc.gd '/pkd($$IfT40#   #$44 laf4pT ߎdi‘MД$ & F x*$G$a$gde & F 5|Tx*$G$^|`Tgdegdcgdc.gdc & F 5 *$G$^` gde & F 5 x*$G$^` gde .x[$gdV18~ ̚ՠ;fx̫ & F ;^`;gde.gdcgdgdc  h^gd$ & F *$G$a$gde8~ՠ/9:;EIUǥ,5ߦxyūʫ˫̫R\ ͻܘܻܘ܊yܻܘܘͻ܊ܻ hhQ>CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ hhKTCJOJQJ^JaJ#hh>*CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhKT>*CJOJQJ^JaJh*b>*CJOJQJ^JaJ hhcCJOJQJ^JaJ#hhc>*CJOJQJ^JaJ/LF PұI4C5:_ѽ  h^gd.gdV1  & F gde & F 5*$G$gde & F 5x*$G$gde.xgdV1.gdcgdI4żѽ$12Xqrqfʹʹʤʓʤʁoʁ]ʁ#hhcCJOJQJ\^JaJ#hhKT5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhc5CJOJQJ^JaJ hhV1CJOJQJ^JaJ(hhcCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  hhKTCJOJQJ^JaJ hhcCJOJQJ^JaJ#hhc>*CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhKT>*CJOJQJ^JaJѽ*Ixpp2QXgdcgdc9 & F |Tx^|`Tgde .x[$gdV1gdQ>.gdc9 & F `gde9 & F x`gdeWqf%V1'NZgd.gdKTgdQ>9 & F |Tx^|`Tgde.xgdtygdcgdc.gdcgdV1f%ij~V%'ԿԿԿucRc@c#hhty>*CJOJQJ^JaJ hhKTCJOJQJ^JaJ#hhc>*CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhc5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhKT5CJOJQJ^JaJ hhcCJOJQJ^JaJ(hh&U{CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hhcCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hhtyCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH +hhc>*CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH LMNZ`i35F /;B޾ް޾޾̞̍ޞ޾޾{#hhc>*CJOJQJ^JaJ hhKTCJOJQJ^JaJ#hhty5CJOJQJ^JaJh&U{CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ#hhc5CJOJQJ^JaJ hhcCJOJQJ^JaJ hhtyCJOJQJ^JaJ,Zz 7FQD 0^`0gdKTgdcgdty.gdcgdc /;bs,&`'?.xgdtygdgd.[$gdKT  h^gd.gdc 0^`0gdKTgdcBC YbV_&BK(1Zd|@wox!!"%%%%ܼܛܛܛ܊y hhCJOJQJ^JaJ hhgCJOJQJ^JaJ#hhc>*CJOJQJ^JaJh*b>*CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhc6CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ hhcCJOJQJ^JaJ#hhcCJOJQJ\^JaJ+#|J  8 @wF@} & F 5*$G$gde & F 5x*$G$gde & F 5*$G$gde & F 5x*$G$gde .x[$gdty.gdcgd & F 5*$G$gde & F 5x*$G$gde0m] & F 5*$G$gde & F x*$G$gde & F 5x*$G$gde & F 5*$G$gde & F 5x*$G$gde .x[$gdty0h^`0gdC  !!!#=#$$%%%!%(%<%D%9 & F `x^``gde9 & F 0x^`0gde gd''.gd h^gdggdty.gdc h^gd%%!%(%<%n%y%%%''''!'"','-']'^'e'f'l'm'''''-(h(i(((?)b)c))))))****?*R*ȶ#hhu5CJOJQJ^JaJ hhuCJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJ#hh5CJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJ(hhCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "h*bCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH -D%W%m%n%y%%%%%G&b&|m[9 & F S`Sgde9P^P`gdu9 & F ^`gde9 & F x^`gde9 & F 0x^`0gde9X^X`gd9 & F ^`gde9 & F x^`gde b&r&&&&&''!','K']'e'l'r'9 & F nx^`ngde9 & F pn^p`ngde9 & F pnx^p`ngde9 & F nx`ngde9 & F S`Sgde9 & F S`Sgder''''''.(((()?)yye9 & F S`Sgde9 & F S`Sgde9 & F 0x^`0gde9 & F l`lgde9 & F 0^`0gde9 & F px^p`gde9 & F nx^`ngde ?)b))))***?*R*S*s]Xgd[9 & F 0^`0gde9 & F (0^(`0gde9 & F 0x^`0gde9 & F 0^`0gde9 & F (0^(`0gde9 & F (0x^(`0gde9 & F 0x^`0gde R*S*T*U*^****N.O...o/r/:1X15555$5,5a5ìxxxxgc\G9xh&U{CJOJQJ^JaJ(hhCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  htyhlEhlE hh ]CJOJQJ^JaJ hhlECJOJQJ^JaJ#hhu>*CJOJQJ^JaJ hhuCJOJQJ^JaJ,hhCJOJPJQJ^JaJmH sH ,hhuCJOJPJQJ^JaJmH sH  hhCJOJQJ^JaJ(hh[CJOJQJ^JaJnH tH S*T*U*^***++T,,$--.N..o/:1X11 $a$gdu & F 0*$G$^`0gde$ & F ;*$G$^`;a$gdegdu gdu'11H2,33u44555$595:5a555667gdlE gdlE'gd{b$J ^J `a$gdu $a$gdu$ & F 0*$G$^`0a$gde$ & F *$G$`a$gdea555666666666777777777888ŰŘŰm[Mh*bCJOJQJ^JaJ#jh*bCJOJQJU^JaJ/j*h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJ$hhlE0JCJOJQJ^JaJ/j[)h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJ)jhhlECJOJQJU^JaJ hhlECJOJQJ^JaJ(h*bhlECJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hhlECJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 7728U8b8j888889;;<=>b?@AAAAAABB B'gdB dd[$\$gdlEgd*bgdlE88888888899999999>:?:ɷpXpEp0p(hhlECJOJQJ^JaJmH sH $hhlE0JCJOJQJ^JaJ/jV+h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJ)jhhlECJOJQJU^JaJ hhlECJOJQJ^JaJhlECJOJQJ^JaJ$h1h*b0JCJOJQJ^JaJ#jh*bCJOJQJU^JaJ/j*h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJh*bCJOJQJ^JaJ hh*bCJOJQJ^JaJ?::::;;;;;;;;;;X<Y<<Ӿy`yD`-`y`y,hhlE0JCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 7jx-h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJmH sH 1jhhlECJOJQJU^JaJmH sH (hhlECJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 1jhhlECJOJQJU^JaJmH sH ,hhlE0JCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH )jhhlECJOJQJU^JaJ/j+h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJ(hhlECJOJQJ^JaJmH sH <<<<<e=f======P>Q>>>>>>"?#?K?ʳʞʞʳʞmUm<ʞ1jhhlECJOJQJU^JaJmH sH /j}/h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJ)jhhlECJOJQJU^JaJ7j.h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJmH sH (hhlECJOJQJ^JaJmH sH ,hhlE0JCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 1jhhlECJOJQJU^JaJmH sH 7j!.h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJmH sH K?L?M?`?a????@@@@@@@@@@@@AAAAʳʞʞʳʞpʞTʳʞʞ7j1h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJmH sH "hCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 7j1h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJmH sH (hhlECJOJQJ^JaJmH sH ,hhlE0JCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 1jhhlECJOJQJU^JaJmH sH 7jZ0h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJmH sH AAAAAAAABBB B`BrBcMʳʢiR>+$hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ'hhlE5CJOJPJQJ^JaJ,hhBCJOJPJQJ^JaJmH sH ,hhCJOJPJQJ^JaJmH sH hlEPJmH sH  htyhG hhlECJOJQJ^JaJ hh^CJOJQJ^JaJ,hhlE0JCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 1jhhlECJOJQJU^JaJmH sH 7jG2h9xh9xCJOJQJU^JaJmH sH  B`BrBCF2HGJ4LcMIII:$x$d%d&d'd5$7$9DNOPQ]^a$gdlE:$xx$d%d&d'd5$7$9DNOPQ]^a$gdlE:$xx$d%d&d'd5$7$9DNOPQ]^a$gdlE gdlEcMdMqMMMUOVO_PaPgQhQQQQRRReSSWWHXZXqXsXXXXYYZZw>w~κΟκΟ΋΋Οxκ΋κf΋Ο#hhlE;CJOJQJ^JaJ$hhcCJOJPJQJ^JaJ'hhlE6CJOJPJQJ^JaJ5jhhlE0JCJEHOJPJQJU^JaJ'hhlECJH*OJPJQJ^JaJ$hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ hhlECJOJQJ^JaJh*bCJOJQJ^JaJ"cMqM RXXXZ _aejtw>wiyN; & F 7gdc;$$ & F 7gdc;$$ & F 7gdc$ 5$7$9Da$gdc; & F 7gd*b~~~~efǁ́ށQf;z`w,ÙřݮݞݍyeeyL:#hchlE5CJOJQJ^JaJ0hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsH'hhlE5CJOJPJQJ^JaJ&hhlE5>*CJOJQJ^JaJ hhlECJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJPJQJ^JaJ'hhlECJOJPJQJ\^JaJ5jhhlE0JCJEHOJPJQJU^JaJ$hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJhX"CJOJPJQJ^JaJ6;8`w,Ùԙܙ $$$IfgdlE"$ & F *$5$7$9DG$^`a$gde$ 5$7$9Da$gdc;$$ & F 7gdgřԙ6.Ia 0{'eo(2ϡСѡҡ!vv_vL$h* hlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ,h9x5CJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHu0jh* hlE5CJOJPJQJU^JaJ'h* hlE5CJOJPJQJ^JaJ$hchlECJOJPJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ1hchlECJOJQJ^JaJfHq #hchlE5CJOJQJ^JaJ hchlECJOJQJ^JaJ6r9---- $$$IfgdlEkd2$$IfTrEl t#' `````244 lap2T.lƛYkd94$$IfTrEl t#'  44 lap T $$$IfgdlEfIeYYYYY $$$IfgdlEkd5$$IfTrEl t#'  44 lap TIJaʝ eYYYYYY $$$IfgdlEkd5$$IfTrEl t#'  44 lap T 0q{eYYY $$$IfgdlEkd6$$IfTrEl t#'  44 lap T{|uiii $$$IfgdlEkd7$$IfTFE# ̙̙    44 lap̙̙T'eouiii $$$IfgdlEkd8$$IfTFE# ̙̙    44 lap̙̙Topqpg[g $$$IfgdlE $IfgdlEkd9$$IfT4PFE#`` ̙̙    44 laf4p̙̙T<pddd $$$IfgdlEkdt:$$IfT4FE#   ̙̙    44 laf4p̙̙Ty $$$IfgdlE $IfgdlEpkdi;$$IfT4_0E#` 44 laf4pTK;!xb<<<%$ & F 0xx*$5$7$9DG$^`0a$gde$ xx5$7$9Da$gdc xx5$7$9D^xgd*bpkd-<$$IfT4$0E#  44 laf4pT!"K;F!+űֵ׵'EѹǫxxfRRǫxx'hhlE5CJOJPJQJ^JaJ#hhlE;CJOJQJ^JaJ3hhlECJOJPJQJ\^JaJmHnHsH0hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsH6hhlE5CJOJPJQJ\^JaJmHnHsH$hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ$h* hlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ$h* h* CJOJPJQJ^JaJ ѹIu!$ & F 0*$5$7$9DG$^0`a$gde$ 5$7$9Da$gdc$$ & F hh*$5$7$9DG$^ha$gde; & F 7gdc%$ & F 0xx*$5$7$9DG$^`0a$gde Dj,r$n8$$d%d&d'd5$7$9DNOPQ^`a$gdc$5$7$9Da$gdc$$ & F hh*$5$7$9DG$^ha$gde$ 5$7$9Da$gdc$05$7$9D^0`a$gdc Dj*,.r瞊vcL/9hhlEB* CJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHphsH,hhlECJOJQJ^JaJmHnHsH$hhcCJOJPJQJ^JaJ'hhlECJOJPJQJ\^JaJ'hhlE5CJOJPJQJ^JaJ$hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ3hhlECJOJPJQJ\^JaJmHnHsH6hhlE5CJOJPJQJ\^JaJmHnHsH0hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsHr$&$%hj׳ן׳mmYHm hh' CJOJQJ^JaJ'hhlE5CJOJPJQJ^JaJ0hh' CJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsH0hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsH'hhlECJOJPJQJ\^JaJ hhlECJOJQJ^JaJ$hh' CJOJPJQJ^JaJ$hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ*hhlE5CJOJPJQJ\^JaJ$h{YG$ 5$7$9Da$gd' !$$ & F hhxx*$5$7$9DG$^ha$gde8$:$d%d&d'd5$7$9DNOPQ^`:a$gdc$ 5$7$9Da$gdc8$$d%d&d'd5$7$9DNOPQ^`a$gdc+@OC ; & F 7gd' ?$ 0$d%d&d'd*$5$7$9DG$NOPQ^`0a$gd' $ 5$7$9Da$gd' $$ & F hh*$5$7$9DG$^ha$gde?$ 0$d%d&d'd*$5$7$9DG$NOPQ^`0a$gd' +@BD\~Ѿ{m\H{/{0hhgCJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsH&hhlE5>*CJOJQJ^JaJ hhlECJOJQJ^JaJh*bCJOJQJ^JaJ0hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsH0hh' CJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsH hh' CJOJQJ^JaJ$hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ'hhlE5CJOJPJQJ^JaJ3hhlE5CJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsHw<\+5]~$ wx5$7$9D^wa$gd=t!!$ & F X*$5$7$9DG$^X`a$gde$ 5$7$9Da$gd' ;$$ & F 7gd=t!~%&5]ڿ{hfhSh?/hX"CJOJPJQJ^JaJ&hhlE5>*CJOJQJ^JaJ$h*bh=t!CJOJPJQJ^JaJU$h*bhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ,h9x5CJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHu0jh*bhlE5CJOJPJQJU^JaJ'h*bhlE5CJOJPJQJ^JaJ4jh*bh=t!CJOJQJU^JaJmHnHu$hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ$hhgCJOJPJQJ^JaJin relation to the information chain (on the left). An IOC Executive Council Working Group The sections above described the tasks in the context of GOHWMS (see also figure 1) and listed the entities and stakeholders involved in its implementation. We examine now a governance mechanism within IOC, to oversee the coordinated and integrated approach to tsunamis and other hazards related to sea-level warning and mitigation systems. The main IOC players are seven primary subsidiary bodies of IOC: the four ICG/TWS, I-GOOS, JCOMM and IODE. Since these bodies report to the IOC Governing body, the co-ordination has to be ensured at the executive level of IOC, namely the Executive Council. Therefore: F A co-ordinating body shall be established on tsunamis and other hazards related to sea-level warning and mitigation systems, as a Working Group of the Executive Council. IOC Resolution XXIV-14 established a Working Group on Tsunamis and other hazards related to sea-level Warning and mitigation Systems (TOWS-WG). The mandate agreed in that resolution asked the TOWS-WG to: Advise on co-ordinated development and implementation activities on warning and mitigation systems for tsunamis and other hazards related to sea level of common priority to all ICG/TWSs, with special emphasis on: harmonization and standardization of relevant observation, data management and communication, forecast and warning practices development of synergies in capacity-building and outreach activities reinforcement of intergovernmental, international and national capabilities on hazard knowledge, vulnerability, and impact assessment effective coordination with all related subsidiary bodies, experts groups and partner organizations with relevant mandates. Report to the IOC Executive Council and Assembly on these common activities and propose new actions, as required. Advise the IOC Executive Council and Assembly regarding: instructions to the relevant subsidiary bodies responsible for coordinating the implementation of TOWS-WG actions; and any liaison or consultation required with relevant international and intergovernmental stakeholders in implementing TOWS-WG actions not under the unique mandate of IOC. The TOWS-WG shall review and provide guidance on establishing the framework mechanism for a comprehensive, sustained and integrated end-to-end global system covering tsunami and other hazards related to sea level, exploiting existing IOC mechanisms, capacities and capabilities, and facilitating priority projects and programmes, in alignment with the IOC Strategic Plan and IOC Executive Council decisions and in coordination with relevant stakeholders. ANNEX V list of acronyms CAPCommon Alerting Protocol CARIBE-EWSTsunami and other Coastal Hazards Warning System for the Caribbean and Adjacent RegionsCoPCommunities of Practice CTBTOComprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organisation DBCPData Buoy Cooperation PanelDRR WMO Disaster Risk ReductionGEBCOGeneral Bathymetric Chart of the OceansGEO Group on Earth ObservationsGEOSSGlobal Earth Observation System of SystemsGLOSS Global Sea-Level Observing SystemGOOSGlobal Ocean Observing SystemGOWHMSad hoc Working Group for Global Tsunami and Other Ocean-related Hazards Early Warning SystemGTS Global Telecommunication SystemHLO UNESCO High Level ObjectiveICAM Integrated Coastal Area Management ProgrammeICGIntergovernmental Coordination GroupICSUInternational Council for ScienceIFRCInternational Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies ()IGBP International Geosphere-Biosphere ProgrammeINCOISIndian National Centre for Ocean Information ServicesINMARSAT Formerly: International Mobile Satellite OrganizationIODEIOC International Oceanographic Data and Information ExchangeISDRUn International Strategy for Disaster ReductionITICInternational Tsunami Information CentreITSUInternational Coordination Group for the Tsunami Warning System in the Pacific (superseded by PTWS)IUGGInternational Union of Geodesy and GeophysicsJCOMMWMO-IOC Joint Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine MeteorologyMDGUnited Nations Millennium Development GoalsMLAmain line of actionNEAMTWSTsunami Early Warning and Mitigation System in the North-Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and Connected SeasNMHSWMO National Meteorological and Hydrological Service NTWC National Tsunami Warning CenterOCHAOffice for the Coordination on Humanitarian Affairs ()PPEWPlatform for the Promotion of Early WarningPTWSPacific Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (formerly ITSU)RTWCRegional Tsunami Warning CentreSIDS Small Island Developing StatesTCUTsunami Coordination UnitTOWSTsunamis and Other Hazards Related to Sea-Level Warning and Mitigation SystemsTWFP Tsunami Warning Focal PointTWSTsunami Warning SystemUNDPUN Development Programme UNGAUnited Nations General AssemblyWGWorking GroupWIS WMO Information SystemWMOWorld Meteorological OrganizationWSSDWorld Summit on Sustainable DevelopmentWWRP WMO World Weather Research Programme ( This document contains an eexecutive summary in English, French, Spanish and Russian  IOC Resolutions XXIII-12 to 14 respectively.  IOC Resolution XXIII-I5  IOC Resolution EC-XXXIX.8.  A similar approach being developed for the implementation GOOS through regional ocean observing systems (ROOS) co-ordinated by GOOS regional alliances (GRA).  ISDR System and the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction, through UN Resolutions 60/195 and 61/198 http://www.unisdr.org/eng/about_isdr/basic_docs/GA-resolution/a-res-61-198-eng.pdf     UNESCO UNESCO 2008 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 page ( PAGE ii) IOC/Future-I/3 page ( PAGE xvi) page IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 page ( PAGE i) IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 page ( PAGE x) IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 page ( PAGE ix) IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 page ( PAGE iii) IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 page  PAGE 16 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 page  PAGE 15 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex II - page  PAGE 16 IOC/EB-IBCCA-IX/3 Annex II - page  PAGE 16 I IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex II IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex I - page  PAGE 2 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex I IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex II - page  PAGE 2 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex II IOC/Future-I/3 Annex III - page  PAGE 16 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex III IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex III - page  PAGE 2 IOC-XX/? Annex ___ - page  PAGE 16 IOC-XX/? Annex ___ - page  PAGE 16 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex IV page  PAGE 14 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex IV - page  PAGE 15 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex IV IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex V - page  PAGE 2 IOC/EB-IBCCA-IX/3 Annex ___ - page  PAGE 16 IOC/TOWS-WG-I/3 Annex V |~jmq9mnopqwͺ~~zpc\E,hhCJOJPJQJ^JaJmH sH  htyhhtyhlEPJmH sH hlEPJmH sH hlE0hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsH$hh' CJOJPJQJ^JaJh*bCJOJPJQJ^JaJ$h*bh*bCJOJPJQJ^JaJhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJ$hhlECJOJPJQJ^JaJhCJOJPJQJ^JaJ~klm9o]];!$ & F Xx*$5$7$9DG$^X`a$gde$ x5$7$9Da$gd' gkd<$$Iflh0%" t0644 la($ 7$5$7$9DIf^7`a$gd*bl4ZIlmnoyto'gdBgdlE$xx5$7$9Da$gdlE$5$7$9Da$gd' !$ & F |x*$5$7$9DG$^|`a$gde!$ & F Xx*$5$7$9DG$^X`a$gde!$ & F `x*$5$7$9DG$^``a$gde opqy u $IfYD<gd&U{Lkd?=$$Ifl0$K64 la $7$8$H$Ifgd9x$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{ gd5@'gd|'gdB wxy )+1\]^bc% + , O S ҿnYnnnnn(hX"hX"CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH #hX"hX"5CJOJQJ^JaJ hX"hX"CJOJQJ^JaJ+hX"hX"CJOJQJ^JaJhmH sH .hX"hX"5CJOJQJ^JaJhmH sH $hhCJOJPJQJ^JaJ,hhCJOJPJQJ^JaJmH sH ,hhBCJOJPJQJ^JaJmH sH "  *+1]GLkd>$$Ifl0$K64 la $7$8$H$Ifgd9x$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{Lkd=$$Ifl0$K64 la]^cHLkd>$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{Lkde>$$Ifl0$K64 laHLkd?$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{Lkd)?$$Ifl0$K64 la$ % , N G: $IfYD<gd&U{LkdO@$$Ifl0$K64 la $7$8$H$Ifgd9x$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{Lkd?$$Ifl0$K64 laN O T r s z  HLkdA$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{Lkd@$$Ifl0$K64 laS T s y z            % & T W X ~         # ) * a j k        ! " L Q       < ? @ m p q    ܲܲĜ+hX"hX"CJOJQJ^JaJhmH sH #hX"hX"CJOJQJ]^JaJ.hX"hX"5CJOJQJ^JaJhmH sH  hX"hX"CJOJQJ^JaJ#hX"hX"5CJOJQJ^JaJ=       HLkdA$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkduA$$Ifl0$K64 la  & S T X } HLkdB$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{Lkd9B$$Ifl0$K64 la} ~      H: $7$8$H$Ifgd9xLkd_C$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdB$$Ifl0$K64 la   " # * ` HLkd#D$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdC$$Ifl0$K64 la` a k     HLkdD$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdD$$Ifl0$K64 la     " K HLkdE$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdIE$$Ifl0$K64 laK L Q     G: $IfYD<gd&U{LkdoF$$Ifl0$K64 la $7$8$H$Ifgd9x$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{Lkd F$$Ifl0$K64 la   ; < @ l HLkd3G$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdF$$Ifl0$K64 lal m q     H: $7$8$H$Ifgd9xLkdG$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdG$$Ifl0$K64 la  :;AaHLkdH$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdYH$$Ifl0$K64 la 9;@ARYbg;@AaŰŞp[(hX"hX"CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH .hX"hX"5CJOJQJ^JaJhmH sH +hX"hX"CJOJQJ^JaJhmH sH #hX"hX"CJOJQJ\^JaJ)hX"hX"B*CJOJQJ^JaJph hX"hX"CJOJQJ^JaJ#hX"hX"5CJOJQJ^JaJ.hX"hX"5CJOJQJ^JaJhmH sH abgG: $IfYD<gd&U{LkdI$$Ifl0$K64 la $7$8$H$Ifgd9x$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdI$$Ifl0$K64 la:G: $IfYD<gd&U{LkdCJ$$Ifl0$K64 la $7$8$H$Ifgd9x$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdI$$Ifl0$K64 la:;A`aeHLkdK$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdJ$$Ifl0$K64 laade249Z]lpq   үoha htyhi& htyh+hX"hX"CJOJQJ^JaJhmH sH #hX"hX"5CJOJQJ^JaJ.hX"hX"5CJOJQJ^JaJhmH sH #hX"hX"CJOJQJ\^JaJ hX"hX"CJOJQJ^JaJ&hX"hX"5CJOJQJ\^JaJ1hX"hX"5CJOJQJ\^JaJhmH sH !ZH$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdK$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{LkdiK$$Ifl0$K64 la3H: $7$8$H$Ifgd9xLkdL$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{Lkd-L$$Ifl0$K64 la349YZ]kG:: $IfYD<gd&U{LkdSM$$Ifl0$K64 la $7$8$H$Ifgd9x$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdL$$Ifl0$K64 laklqHLkdN$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdM$$Ifl0$K64 la HLkdN$$Ifl0$K64 la $IfYD<gd&U{$7$8$H$IfYD<gd&U{LkdyN$$Ifl0$K64 la    dr23567t $ 7x*$5$7$9DG$^7`a$gd* 7^7`gdX" ^`gd=t!Lkd=O$$Ifl0$K64 la  )Dbders23478:;=>@FHSTUeȻȻȪȻxxxxgg`O h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJ h8CPh9x h9x5CJ$OJQJ\^JaJ$jhUh h`h9xOJQJ^JmH sH )jh`h9x0J:CJOJQJU^J hX"h9xOJQJ^JmH sH hX"h9xOJQJ^J)jhX"h9x0J:CJOJQJU^Jh9xmH sH h8CPh9xmH sH h9x j*h8CPh9x0J79:<=?@GHTUexyz ^ gdR gd: |$a$ ]^ ]^$a$gd5$a$gd8CP$a$eklrsuvy뽵֔ց֔lWl)hvKCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHsH u(h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH %hvKCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJ h: |h9xh9xmHnHujh9xUh9x)hvKCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHsH u)jh6h9xCJOJQJU^JaJ(h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "%9:;K\]^^gdR $a$gd8CP  ]^ gdR  ]^ gdR $a$gd5^ ^ gdR   $+,2367:;KPQWXZ[]^stz{}~»٦ّ|ujh=t!h9xmH sH  hR h9x)hvKCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHsH u(h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmHsH h8CPh9xh9x%hvKCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJ)jh6h9xCJOJQJU^JaJ(^n  67^gd=t! ]^ ]^^gdrhf^gdR  ]^gdR ]^gdR  #+,23ݮ݊xcNcN)jh6h9xCJOJQJU^JaJ(h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJ$h=t!h9xCJPJmHnHsHtHh=t!h9xmHsHh9xmHnHsH uh^h9x6]mH sH h^h9xmH sH h9xh9xmHnHsH uh=t!h9xmH sH jh9xU34578HOPQaqrxyz{|}~     !)to *h9xh9xmHnHsH ujh9xUh^h9xmH sH h=t!h9xmH sH  h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJh9xCJOJQJ^JaJh9x(h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH )jh6h9xCJOJQJU^JaJ)hvKCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHsH u+78HPQa|}~ 567^gd=t!^gd=t!)*0134FILQRXY[\^m~͸y͸ePP)jh6h9xCJOJQJU^JaJ&h6h9x6CJOJQJ]^JaJ)hvK0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu$h6h9x0JCJOJQJ^JaJ-jh6h9x0JCJOJQJU^JaJ(h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJ h9x6] *h9xh9xmHnHuh9xjh9xU7@]^n/01gd6 ]^gd=t!^gd=t!$a$gd=t!gd=t! ]^ ]^#$*+-ƭœ׭|׭qeWqOqODh9xmHnHsH ujh9xUh^h9x6]mH sH  *h^h9xmH sH h^h9xmH sH )hvKCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHsH uh6h9xmH sH  hX"h9xCJOJQJ^JaJ(h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH h9x h6h9xCJOJQJ^JaJ)jh6h9xCJOJQJU^JaJ%hvKCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu-.01IKLSTYZ[ htyhi&hi&h hX"h9xCJOJQJ^JaJh9xh^h9xmH sH jh9xU 1AIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[^gdg0&P 1h. A!n"n#$% 3 0&P 1h. A!n"n#$% 0&P 1h. A!n"n#$n% = 000&P 1hP. A!"#$n% < 00&P 1h:psZ. A!"#$n% C 0 00&P 1hP:pV1. A!"#$n% C 0 00&P 1hP:p`. A!"#$n% C 0 00&P 1hP:p*b. A!"#$n% C 0 00&P 1hP:pu. A!"#$n% 9 0&P 1h:pKS. A!"#$n% G 0 00&P 1hP:p=t!. A!"#$n% P < 0 0&P 1h:plE. A!"#$n% = 0 00&P 1hP. A!"#$n% C 0 00&P 1hP:plE. A!"#$n% = 0 00&P 1hP. A!"#$n% n860ᴅm8*PNG  IHDRWOvsRGB pHYs  8DIDATx^]񯽋ro^/.@?F6iBԤ^lXc"I5$5TBR",¥)\.zq<<9xc׿?9ݧp|G9(v ;\k瀣5pppksQu9v8 ]|G9(v ;\k瀣5pppksQu9v8 ]|G9(v ;\kc~Tow^L'o|~q_?ßd˖-;v/{?;&瀣"&vGGpmhp!(0 kϝ;wmsŋeK Ok \HĿG܎V{[޽;eC|b8sN$w 7@ؽ{78䀣@CBu_~x^lgfap@ ?pQ`zA_ti`ue7Ӳ Qr}9 p[^x}߿zGTڵk0.rRt=__?9Ʉj#ob(!opP[;@%\r̙ʏeѣ0}Y7"n>2?y˖-ā//ڵ}WɁ3gPnxה_Mլ]ꫯ_bٳg*z\,o۶-~}hgϞvZLh ~[fr\K/42@=x [ѣG=sd(.@n?l-wX GixOq)[c&VZDdSh_cdt;w;c 9[`Ynt%.`2KePr'K9[y&(۪F(S|5Y8;ɜ2>Lm@̚F3k2ːŷ65XW|]g. G]␡nke 4_yQ@ !Y7nZci+( n )`~e!pG mmƱp2P6uR`{-AZ5va` RHn(2'~a,,7/_|aJ.zu28_0~֭[7n`{զ,PSOᦽ+'8[K4 .ߤ1p6rr{7\0}D Q nӆIz3@h*^E{7lLܹgpD.3<⹘'|r | /<dFTaDg΁ůħ~mb>zMɁzɯP,GdJsСC~g)QieOJ L {%.xF`Zu'ာ I~3· [ZBLYEt_B4(;Ş|Iϋ5rJh8m좛Hx ؿ$&/71Lշ'P)' Ν;7I2xqbGKe'KW99ͪ\u’%jz3"9pA z^Flr.i-K倬 -(p%Q,U|^#G>>UQ|d9#:qرc9T.Ϊ(ojk4A9P8J9[UQ*ׇp̂#tRe|fl}8@`7fY8"J JHx u5יx=pM_3790/p̙35)y^}qAA ʚjWBI5=J_~D*OÁ E]`k4MF2ypPPsƙByzSSsԈHCm?s&J#Tݻw7?)msi,ިpLj͹ T{29Sh1WԀ`x#3vY^6ߣWq&dCEi瞀 8 ҋFV ƫf{kDx N_L+y%*2@qΝg8@X;-msyơ;+bfn?d 2<8YsAO{,T+Ō+ W<"PT†R?>`훞?iRZ;Q~#}G@]/W~ s DVD }'Ũ,U &ڹs']ts}t-Kz饗TEI[.>%zׇq'8o3q+ x{. ):uE@'?C~7S}ǎ 8[UxUiݓw Hۏ[Ϫe8M`KHuw^([bnV;Z_eGi.FR;3u ռ؉45 ;lb`v!zH \d`񑜚5WCbDV ߔ5:2ߣ e6j؊n{;{YRԉR(>pQꕓ|NcRnMl5A}dabՠ:p@YBP | $=((%DDn`Ӎuw}P#뢷B4cN<<D)^qHN ] X~uK>2yJ *ؔX2/1((০mh_&SI>V&A,TΔ@0YWx z|$)*C5#)(5ޤ>bMF/I-2, L/J'i,Kd #gڱWY,dn3; $2ViU]@zO8R96zZu(D%h}t h^,M<:"GIg}RFL 7 o_1 &yW m"=sdj&&':8 4 lK݇bul0<Ge"smBu@iJ3 tGʩ(![`sD7,go.w(ghFH2U9X{GZ0_z -: nf䚁с@m-zG'c(A? RDX& L \uTZbcrB񖣪KJ>('+9UP\  is64; (͡x3UYܢJ9G J9 `jU.at@?O jBɓ %dJ(ތbaS}webBǖ0?i u[68 2+굟S.VfJL Tѭ&Dn`D 8ű 5^54 (i;9Sʄ&(0Φpg2)/u~M!Vv ~wQ`];@oN~p!P> Di7&7)їiXlQՉJAFMS;؞{vyIyZpWF|ۤz We0t+k;ͮezD,Q3l`cu+' 8! hOL]U Y'z@ՒʼsG!JRosZJ)rxٷ"u=?eKU)D q`[^Rz M8:_˯k:Ж?fEMDYKtR$P 4*P Er+(ճ(*w gyE/ iT(%ބ Z[}P)P JOiH^φ?,BrV77<%޾}>#Vx_goG%onhx}gr07b{K] {ΝXi(pQ%UP~p_>'b)fE{ΖuxWv׮]?mb͏?t"('7obeµkמ}W_}8Э 0A2nͪD!YTG JrLH &UF+.)/d9\P>.`&ȑ!#;[>Ad>t5U&Mj4P^1V1aPM-Ê?Բ 0ˑ;ըϔm- X`+U |-(j\$/0 h(>|Hm{J s'N D.\y]0Gݱch"S0LT2J8(ZX YB$Q`KToZW_}]w5'Lv.:\;߿_I̞={-3AJ|p?@gR8y)ضmѣrԗԹ}B\P^|&9WhɂԏU`ٿyBޟ351Ngņvn h>r(iz&mt::A SkdhZ0 cf:Œ\&,G 7 $]GHsd*zo%bI ڃr,zioQh]F).'}tGuAB VĴ kPS]a’?EQmBTFZsQ3[& | 4zܦTvA51h\Ϥ9dmP _|*T͇H!/ODg>W^ytr^]~T.$Fp`ۇgΜ,D6!([W^_~ [ IlSaZް =xpVVoƦT#ƭ~@:VQ@9M#귫h.L[҈+>GTƆ9v*k"¤{ޘFdO=~xMa'y}lO}DI%42MJ&WBGt5n2Z 5/&M^L$v.p` O/spLk>GXSiR9"+{m窉@ jS?aB,ݜac(լ`c@ 5J6LoD""LE/~`j}g֭>111qɀ- `V ,ͅP~NlޗNRz #G>@o^RW7`@ܽD?'л2ĢBECD _"@- MfZ5ۆB}A0G|J)  QΙIsf s*@ׯH@J~ P8Pቑo%UȬG^i7ؖp=ri)uMУ@,'+YQ G3eN9p(,\gLqf猪~P K\O( 87oe(@(lSRs]Q`6B9@/ʧ^b\PZKTs1~uht2ӋCܔ)b4F7jtN3D9=ZX n?7Ϣ' V^U ѐt *O7Av:ǥ;QpHmn(60 *g 4G(c"8t(D5''5b4E֠U M*}36_ I<HTT`f25fR` })]2Ub==3K@;2|_$PU8r#}g~9-VlsSO=E_j %QBW|4Ɣ"0!O>D#r:Wp1/ G4F H_Gz.yLZ6T.# 6{mFv䚗( mG:K-6md漡HQٸ ȷM=D-;tP#@Xô-0ZٽeĈ4W? eZ KWtupS>LT*1!|[1dpo/x(TT.CVi$@wW :1Ǹ-oxZD~`:bf1rHJRm%; \ax <K4( }f+ϊ5~M;{o@0`}piq=I|!z@?UBGMoЪc QQB$,ҀMD*VY Eve^:MƁ/bOgKsw23ki$$IPSL09#,AJwxtJmWS@;C^{9)7F /  'EҗDr0Po i͡sh zQs1uDQ(@6rAY l97mL 0LP1·2"ptZ(ai KDfؚY0vx83:Z9t0 GswҚ\:q%TF!xDn lzoTG&SL:hQ|;B-#]CiȥLYBպC'ҨU6h; .)((,zkmy(pEAM2mb5M(Hry4'y{y@ kv]Y&p COޠmP(s&imA×Q8{I(8`D4]]ME@Q1PV&6T٤ k`(`8tLX_ p*Ut~reFn+e$J8#i*XqAh5q Lex>HQ$ tb@cErO^kt= k%LX(-56o( `2(3&d2I]eR8:*4ʭ;'_' mUN&n Oڴ<@SX!FլnI|!wc6AOwE4}=RXNDO vQh\@w-?0\O8ϛɳ\ vp6XBH2):P43FpMn$m4 0~(3 jC#C+!-79O/% l $Tpr)J@;`2姦٣@M Hs*ؠ9vκMp7 Urd 6mDXK@0GˋLfa1M~3I͹ѫPzz F&X_/̢59pUd 0hlG. AnbfEd{<cX@{)XY0NrjvEX/@Z]ڛنPsfP!`(P !CYn n+wE_нm}=-6Opy|MAIuT)) +GZ7thSJdY!r͖C1ʉʍeլK SrϺ.L4os_, SYv+[ÞH/, M (zU&=nDxXf^ Е*M-(v_97}ě'ü{9\Oă Y̹j}b,Jڜ"nڣ>L# :[I덎Z\Ą 2,rV)4j(9d7_!ԝ܋~c|v`9 ׂ`MV N{dHT&:j5\k C((5ٖɅz[ t>U&&Ӆ0?tkճSC; !I wb99auI]zVi9s]$]/l5mכFE =眰(h D0yqzfu(@\.rje*P+:Y?LDVbՁ Wi^) u*:T99Xۼ219;CpZcN}(@^zoKR5 Ė]ZBYvi(7Q7:0rp@(uM PV0FQmc"n߾}ɻw'ǭ?VF駟_߼y3+믿oٲŤCt~CY?~Z=gEj/h\Yo*5#0[j)`,R;lJ?ޭ*54ɻrE[ h4bdmԆavkK@??kf5?G0 "ɹaά*XpȱZ@cQBc,`mEjPYQPpaQo-`(w or c+_a-ͷJv6w#T*.j/*-m#GzAu}!ϖ vb @pѕ#nQVhf&.Թ#0,"в3ӻvte>RdrJB:;ad H~.0RQ|E_޳gOz_B?Çƍ_u|7#_۷o۶ /1eCLʕ+A!6ZA8 po{Ts޻wo!_sGD[n;v_ Akd/_ ?V%6q$ہm*p|1gT()Tn!imt~b "+tju~7ݻKZܹsZlU0~kk(Pq$" 0;f| < 7ɴ; LoGgqIV]v&(`Q*|D(QH2F=gnT~`KTWR0}PXZHk@k=XZ}9edrU;~C _}rP8],2GyHL@֭[ÄabM(Pc )F ᅈ~ԓ}!>WQ h`#b5q{@%-0uz\HO9w8+瀣+s`pX΁sQ`w8 8Gk9(:X;֮>瀣s`pX΁sQ`w8 8Gk9(:X;֮>瀣s`pX΁sQ`w8 8Gk9(:X;֮>gb IENDB`FPH(xBTWJFIFHHSoftware: Microsoft OfficeC    $.' ",#(7),01444'9=82<.342C  2!!22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222"` !1AU"6QTtu257Va#Rq34BS$Eb%Hrs8df&CDvB !1QRAq23Sa"4b5BTr#c( ???????bӊmʌ4-&iRTHːYN1 KDUɠ p'!u{Ç)< #5S\Mw_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_ p'!u{Ç)< ##S\Isw_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x9IH]aO:Bz3w_x^jCIuPj+BD}FNU%*CU"4t5:W$i3,-f?=Fb_:{ÝhtȖ~ӧԶ70Z/2s36&:{ÝhtȖy5-]t_heǧLml] NN3VM{|@[7"SG:&bRC-+U"c_n} ~8qupl'菡Ա5*_l*<ˇg~wqрyO8q˂=/R<_3ky'-b#yÎ\\s-b#ŬYt_\t`8q˂K|sŬYt_\8<ˎ;ypCp[/x<ˇg~wq[͞8Oc6;Rv<#Ẍ' ǭmpK|sŬYt_\C MZY9Ŭ%2I;Ԇ_t_hMmJij]CNRPғ|̸rx;-UhPv*aV5TwVХKN9>HNPNQvh%(UӅEt3zOGzOGK[~D-? ?@<D-?I.̠ӥ>=vi#=_^ R<ɟPoqk9$ݭ<Nhx65:弖cZP 6pﺞt 33|YjsR}<^鰤N R 3N/2Rw%܈ӮŰ뵄Jiv] RԩtzM{fʓ;_`k?BSh4ٿG6[(Ӷ .bnYh% T˯ƋQ2rKըA%Gs>S3Ii5ith ȇJ~$,+ԓըg()i{ [،|yhv0Jőp-tzEk?F-~1#zDVYX)gf8TV#Ս^Ke'kx0ISҌ%!Z.9N<Rz2M$ԥgmfDj^ֹm ͨ 7k3# jold\F#S̈Ů>R"^hXDYcI&z~AMJBq:WCKu(*JLQTv-F-Jj~w,+;[F^深ЫJ$xU M,*Cѩ%0$FeܵwɿJScTe>Ey,; GS`JČVZ`ʃ%ЄDnw#%("U nn."CUn!ڴУ̔h੸鶛w־2a2zB6*Km qe#z5*W|mRԙ1*bQKuص"Ȉ2x~EnqcэgV|TutY̲),f_%=72>k=Jr2{?29l2pZrvze3B4i#Ii/4fBǬmU7QeH9 )M[tdf(ȋaz4U7> >Q짭PII2FG#xuYxj+{R5"#$IJרyr )Uc$oB=Dq&5{ItOQ0BKK+!iu\$'n{,T!˔PFW"kD KضZr-sV4ı)@ރ"CNdDHjI,HјX"L‹0蕤UiyKFEɻIY$dn%ө%&vooc)'t_heƣt_heǡ1Y-ûJc}x҅Xo/ߪT@UsMыCLz.nG%M*2$DqNx*(T p}Er: p֞\E| u @ƴ"6|9p3Y-i#^cIƂ=4?u]Ef֣47r!fYe$"#Y-O;K3|moa띴ܝpWisl\L}(BTȌkޕVT_NR266E}%FFGmϘrp⮪\R$Tìh%fzMw"vW±ϥ/H´ͯU 8%I+DIeH{K JPi}:,O2iU0QS:EwV*C#bQ$}bEV3MDFdd[jK èuRKmJJer22de8qU+^ j:i4ˉ{NXNfFI>H,hɍ]E-ZY_(;޶ ҡt\c^^(Y 3fÏ4qKZ.U<ָ) c -p8^&`)ï)ԫ%"¯lP+7*2O}f#";_ZDDk({9!ܪLiv.>-J˕(;Df#VZee&Wv{9û-twrULSW.Ƶ˚dZMJuzۍ͈KQd4$BQ<{k#f*+uovؕ fCVOosXFFfv"#+\EPqCGr"-;2<#Τ&FB54GNۻ[Om^S&j88"O3}KCydRVrjeB-ͣ]gҕL'MR #Hn2I磹kl"?<œiiF;cnǥVw+f.{{Ì.{{Š>wz{|m.6 "RT#B x-H&}Bg8-; KQr}v.$[*_$' x-H&}Bc x-H&}B5}b<)fRT3TCh%5d^2#_P׶o4ZZVJJw%2>RVNxoFd7ROF+raSa}.$,Mkfʒ+ۓ`GKC N1t%v,JtM=cQpZD8".FƟI*;aG8REXp"iN(DYKZIp3[iї:vﱾNKc7e W?؋Yƭe(%Shéo3M![Y+x M4jځHh̍g$dZj2/7Y-=Ez5**є_湎u'MRCQcHKj"l_Ģ+} Q%2I#RԢ+Y-pgXܢʗےgr' }8=&ÊS|bWV̤6iS'+/g¸MN=n|RڒJ,s#2j&SQ(1MFyIBu#zDIVW""bՐ3vQ$d{ W(qu4J3z^cI*F['1eQSMغL0HЍ+6r%s.FAZg+kJ@*jZllFMDz_@MYrxjn5dڳ˴7S~52b9(-rgnhW5vT%CM'25!%ߙZdQ<_<x-Q,f1LЄۤ9.l|խ&; :)yyiڔ]Z]c Tb],=M) |9ZiJyMwSJy!ۑcVnTƦ7*cRDڎJDwQ؋eOrn 9/6L[Tc=E!gdnrUsԕ82J~TY3BJ׍Ri?}RC8LQi>C3JJJGk!OfO:wJKj1q4$LJWmdF܈Gbjk#AhרIU&kQ>Gaڕ඾b~{Wj2%7ԂW3X; fsm6BDXRЦRJv2=cx'{c )ju.98bN}u{ '#8GѦ$ڇXWzuF iYrTTm&iq*#pωy~8NϲVa9Z@_>lH?(tEMFb}7Q~G/X(uE@ƀg}Fz^W:ʬJ5-8ی>]i)FZ4[*(qO+FT8$ty+_|JkJ0q<ׯJpe@9._:VΕ%~`y_}x8p۲uy+_|JkJ0<ׯG8mxs:KΕ%~``UiޛY:si'²SdZCt햼I#Ӹwk^$~pe@9._:VΕ%~`y_}x8p۲uy+_|JkJ0<ׯG8mxs6[ SC.!$ʣJ6JC5%DK2;.A0zOEӛN;\uzP P}皕PKpTe*Q$sJE{%%{r0RPA=$}4ڵw|ZW_:V_}x8p۲uy+_|JkJ0<ׯG8mxs:KΕ%~`>ckE p 7²u1>fZ$Ӹyz;>'{wҵį t}+|ׯHnÙրr]t}+y+_|J^peC/y/41|ZWP$T} Z\&ߩHq4fGc"=e&J*9 >iW󄢣-+̘מH^ R<ɟP^ R<ɟPu"J޲] Z3.-GZwOOԩ|~ğT5#̙}5#̙zSK¿S見6te$ 9kRWKdɚW"Ԯ"+܈׫i89bQ.bͨQ#71M®w9eֶl'5j)"Fv3$2GpT's8y4߶iry⺏WXӀʤ&'PJ6wЭ0nHlfZy^S(В?2;jV ³)2ժ6JnesU.61I4{H**9Z촳' eIFZF'9;؎EFo"jwESO3|HN };C[q6T`) ^[$zњǞ #T21(=cVwZYu詾(ڌT:oXj/h}k?X ?:Ϣ{YbR@30d 22ҧ\S$#3Fad&?5?v+p =4qcqs~;jH 8g<W7#F\ߴӀY>/qcqs~;6RõG])ȐŗƓ; x/Wܯ{_j~X4/g<W7#F\ߴӀY>/qcqs~;jH 8g<W7#F\ߴӀY>/qc7ʘ;M$#6zwjH| y$hy|fm8f8Oixv-/ђN˜g4uϱt1q%0,La3_^ @<2cp"]Y{x7% \_^6 .Tĩlu%Hފ'kQ}Gg_gkNYZOfxqs~;jH 8͞g<W7#F\ߴӀY>/qcqs~;jH 8g<W7#F\ߴӀY>/qcqs~;jH 8g<W7#F\ߴӀY>/qcqs~;jH 8g<F\ߴqs~;N{ϋGǑ5?v+p =>?,y#SoG`8Oi|_1Ǒ5?v+p =>?,y#SoG`8Oi|_1Ǒ5?v+p =>?,y#SoG`8Oi|_1Ǒ5?v+p =>?,yin*Zn5r $[f?(c*mI@9d~P龊bAC*o6V^'ְ3P>eC*% 4VRLhn1RJ-FiI_& E[ f:ѥV$ÚSy-?_l;<ѯ0:Yl{fX_Pшz3 q[ΌC|=}^`8W}CF!oWԦZ*#2#=@?{:1_WXfau+}Pшz9+ $:]BbXS : nC>Q`V7KOu%k8fXٸ\ZFwSy-?_la30:u:5úsic8n;<ѯKOp 6oGwHA´xmFmjmw2JB׺sicQ#~  -zC$u%k:1Wq-9rbN*+[Bx o4hR*PXYAq:Be6֟5<*78Uo?xYMOi;_F G@,r{I*708V M MMIA_ۨA7t6o!(FNϹbR' [KsiaN}0xoqN}\ZFÀfau+}Sy-?_l;<ѯ0:ylfϨBseғno`@3XzJFf?KS6 òH?(tEMFb}7Q~G/X(uE@ƀg}[yޡ![yޡZ#Ϡ:>S)!yh[D^eɲy*䔩:Py6ϵ(;C"aǑmkPw6ϵ(3:bm{C͡c vy^?sh|X?ko/F(Tbgd@BK32A[t?g) ԅ!ERʰv~G-Ir֙Ki3K6#O_P&w02jI%)#(}6ϵ(#Z1FkmZe4һ1@6͡c? E5#k>?mkPguMm6ϵ(;CS[yx1@6͡c?~;T^

]9o]*6E>;yGl`^ qwhsm'qi^Oa2cJR Yoi RoFiH$jdJ;)[YX^kU#n&E-kHޑnl5;f=Qmm;ȅNv|=ͥ=9&92?sɔ)NvJg[&6jJ>5f%d%$kfSu }HnɆ1w2AE䔚J"Ԓ;P\fKbS'HniNZ_,>ٗ^Ѩ:+L{ ]eh¶NeI^ҮS]!aGuup*+ZJ+NmIIRBddf(˦~$a 7rJ e.LVsTn31.Ǖ ,&bl-j.ҷ?=!48*'J25Dgc3sf9J.z6?|RA'S/@!Q#~ :7ꐚ1H{ŏcyCx o4hR?Ou?R2z2ò&inBMFIvyT%<”W"u?x ֆa4|GOfR!|GOfRSeTU:k gΏ:e;MA{UnN|}+$wIzV_ZVYCq(YڎfrѯGVT1vZ:W+TY;LZ(̊%75*,CklIe#$jd_Fd0B7*c:B2ṶmGiY*Ќӣ+ͧ2TYFfjh$̐]}CC42;2JjՙOCn0.[X]?!7Qx^:0^Hb(;tڼm_VtT,AGd1fN6+..e D_A-a֒Y7-FfϨBV)>fϨBPz>= y=%Oc#J3XzJF%GG#ICji\2TV2k-G=f$? U^GybB4eZVwnuHƇ)ӧB%jR-"Jr1%Y<ӌ:Y 5Z}j#lR bʍȐ~P龊bAC*o6Vv'ְ3P>eC*% 4x1V7CBx1V7CG[˹@ut9wBm:g=Z']H )11Uƥ>m0K6ͅ:>ܬb"6JKUyt|IW?%eۚ')F$I;X#+=?DXPn[oJHO*ob35(Y٪gMdkc[RiBp%Tqcs"3_I\Jc--Ȼ8'|M aŭgOaahCƓ$)h5%*2#+._&\6ɨYY6*je\gVjsOLj BXSPf99\[7"m=+AypU&Si6ILгi'*#^wHFFf\)nSi{QcUq'IJj5j:}>Zڧ6fģQQ] 3;k"VSڍoՉ 7 Ǭ "n)$V4+Y깑f=.7aBnOT1Ti 6tF++=mBldolhXÇ=>)E>LSVce6g㱙^-<"S% 6TL!&KQJwO1糩zGNSU2\j&ҕ1NWh7t6o!7t6o! u>s~0tؚXwOwOkg( f?(c*mIBڦR쨎Y$Jb1h; ]X`H"n:Qen6Hs66a###rwz w"AC*o6詾(ڋ=Z9؟ZC*4?X E[ Y E[ f:oW.~}>~h|b-((ڎcdTX2MuS2Hi!֬ěŖ.T(RL>b{JzK]U'$G͡uM57\8Kahuq -(rn#IcN;gRG=g6C HTj<0?t|XF3oc6[⹙,mL1*\xSA$zArB J%#![WȊ dзslj6ѥdYRFj~+uGGIS.Hngb3p\tdda1nĔ"9%Il"'ul Ȓ`4dR\W3`Gq0U۔Ee)j×R_iFKYDj `YuI) 7[pK5xilEr3Rj+ۘu*t+V`_&1V?ќi渣Xs&Q_2S|=s6<ٲRk4Ȉ.u1ZSjSSNӒC Ԕ"RW#Vb2<&1V?hd=ǕRח(b(UP>\KJI)2G']t9PW2ؕXۗ^>>ҷK}Z}m&K.m-]\{IU4%KEqF+L>b&1V?ќl5;61]ac0?L(xpcG(ZwQnFX$4f5%nϼRYr$;qwZ> ?͛HMٿTшDd,xCŏcyBI}s/їbanMoKq'1"ess?Q Yi1SZA5wM+$2""רCPrWVI+QM& 7*:ɤƿAcQ.:~2̍le#U&+"mṄtF?b$)>.t5fgsZY9O6xc;F4C;F;y_{@zC€ 1I6}BB1I6}BC-lW` "|$ԭQ7S}Q?(tEMF\CY?X ?:Ϣ{Y` ^ UPŐ^ UPcrgcyOJ/1 |<8L0ve^Vl723 +6g/jcJ~&ūb&n@*7t6o!4B|GOfRF#V`x o4h{aw4<(3g!d9F%|[Y']Ie&_~ fĔ60)TDFҴ9)$FFw#7^Qxi\][MaSƜ=Ծ߼8Ӈ㴇k> 5<GdON_\o(1z:xuh2UFlBdR3;QcIN6Xk> t̎|LlU*,J̋泩;|l幑3# ,ʮqo ҙЌ$؏ת/]Krf4t[;,W3Z̋=Bium'ԡ[IK/{_)cѩw"AC*o6詾(ڋ=Z9ZC*4?X E[ Y E[ f:oW.~}>~ \KmYgb/&ݑ Nxp/e-4.>>_9C fjnfPtÆi|O2љ@B_9C>>[FfM a i|OxKRfDv:RN$ә2FGeam33oJ|<8Uk/F/G o\g&L $[6$w?hxfPtƔ8Rx&{ !p/ Nx)m*jnfPtÆi|O2љ@B_9C>>[FfM i|O8fPt)m4xY<Q-J2/$ sIE٠`:7ꐚ!Q#~ ԉ+zwO# E&ErNM50&Z͒Jmc,b?W?N5%+?ϱ%6@xj*}?\/(ROuDɠ'M;.cazҥUucE-!XȌQ͓84;r;Zڭa-x(FKNۿ eJoF/ ghٿTghٿTW5}/bhHxPӪ>v6,+aIuBQg*mSvgCkahiC.zWۨ35Le! SfIiehQ\ZExdVǦ-lZKO|+-ӞSq\j -&gj;bhsG;bhsG357_^X˙Bo!}C"=)2bLO[1)i2#[BKQD_eQE487X\+ݥaʥEOEJ&Dvx# +WI!eC*% 4x1V7CBx1V7CG[˹@u)™(lk?E}|;@"`N~ߓN],g|2?{ C}E&Z(&F-)iN\[1&QU7c9GrZvBTm䊃Fz9wdmTKxI ɇNQdb:tIw7R;Z_hTj-ѫ*ȸZ"W:Λ뷂T&5tŒqd*H^v̜ˣnfQ*L>mipr>tkշ.ԨUuJZ)jjWJPP-6kڌ8YTYfZG}1{0dT8sSv&-,ʺ ŸDhYX̯Ut2$mdkMJd]JTzlda 2RIjMJ*Q؈*;쿣pClKaS4$iNT7dFW;fW\dTalCJ +nGGSnq+-JQ\3YBE'=j4q5Q]"QD+&FZRdKpwl@b22ESxUۦߎDN)!WּO]ރcת5:z`N*&CrЄךʥ{222ËFkt_(m/`eƣt_(m/`e>S Np*7t6o!4B|GOfRF#V`x o4h{v3`*d9E†ҙxiY _^2_Q!9McCK42IwOyAevFZRd $>W$i܎}NWDԓP"AC*o6詾(ڋ=Z9ZC*4?:W ZMR mε.nKFFGV/*fbC}z&,,;S7ktU6Q̔Id;;cG[˹l-S!U~`hYVa#y@BU<UW0. /Do g! ET}U_+pzUhP}reuXEw_AI٫tbYkC[t~u)%yI6DY27Y[Q^DQIm_•LmNzz)jc1D{u'hq>JI6^H}ʊ1!;$rQY}2Umw‘+(ƸR==K@qo榒h(̔ddvk+FFV( U,IM56pJ2wFճap ;X绢yDi~./UD(ɧr7)ܾ0xJ](LѸgdV)YZi)TsrKV-S!U~`hY{fDw"hZ*CU<UWQ#~ }v~þ R|͟Pþ R|͟P[>Gǹ$5<GdiFkx0ISĵ3hHjPZRR̦VeTI1;cb\#HiJʥo2FV]Vj2Wz4{LqTiqp8 qZ6:ܜHJ3"""\/i1&R] D,jnΥ*+gye[XM)Yӿ|n֔${e!f9 hSrRͧU (V[˛#z:V5Ir')ֶ*)=Z1Jy7ZJTfI4{3&-{iG&6Ȑ~P龊bAC*o6V~'ְR+qo3{1d+qo3{1Du\X™(l)ƳY>ý}N!V*DRiwg˛"MV׶a^nqRN~KqQ o-e{R:>$C UFFwByr,R zY]*]V@LuM)بq sI)ZI3-fZ$zaDu%lA"L*4v[kuJ;"c#2)4:s d*W֚KFuk4%K$8F8VTRJms3ZV/94%Q#F ݒIִ,')sDE|j>)e=@vQ`ӷɔ%v:)T%l+է9.gWEm*SS4,kӱ\X\8U?RoCzLz1)NCFS3$<ȌՖN\(ZF-b>N[/|ZmDA='Kq'KqnyޔSx o4h{aw4<(3g!d+p3g!d92ϠQq@ c*QǞ #T21-L>< Zж4L'3_*KGkxǸ=1+ݕ uZf#%u븆u1Rv%,ҳ[N"0;;WvL:TD!IBRfj-ekf2/Rp&DI} U!Y\ʳfvQIY1+j1 (>*Ngm_QPNOR*ʥDbPXq"Q,q[(6J#NT3%x(bwB<ori|vkϞh"z~7S}Q?(tEMF]J@n"boz,n"boz3hs?>??aOs CG!OtSQ1@`?J˰$ghٿTghٿT u>s0tؚXwOwOkg( f?(c*mI@9d~P龊bAC*o6V^'ְR+qo3{1d+ͭ;Si)n.#JW5D\3hs?=sU~sU~[O,\jU_8\jU_2љ,\jU_8\jU_2љѪe3T:3T:í?| \]s5C]s5CKh| \]s5C]s5CKh| \]s5C]s5CKh| \]s5C]s5CKh| ~Ԋ|U/vU$9[CَsF•Ekص4|]s5C4%q:j/e3T:3T:|,\jU_8\jU_2љ,\jU_8\jU_2љ,\jU_8\jU_2љ,\jU_8\jU_2љ,\jU_8\jU_2љ,\jU_8\jU_2љ,\jU_8\jU_2љŏcyB㋵fuU5R2S $*Nk-i}bIIy$}@RM<>Ɇ>ɏ}F뽟ϲaϲ`,!|GOfR}.}* a=MuL嶸)+Lu(c#ZNxҲckPkPG3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su+@Yqvpqvpe-3Su;bl,}i:!Di*BƓ$ːŀK[=W` c;׊4Һ6{OhY<{eiA[/!~$ROZ]KL;xzw?W^~d{ #]U.WO2=䑹'kQ}G=ޫ/pÛ\=% I!hZ..zkU;;- qZ[ZzWF`/?tl;p%s9H#B=y+gҺ6{nd.ch@g?tlWF`_Ɣf|j?̹e|uKJsͣ]Jvg^Vb"/'K |ޤ&#J_)&SFJVV#n+Y\Ȯgb"3!۩V =vJircMORoR_7=IȪxSZ*jCJDG|el=J#+&zD>*Sk4(xW=*C-?;[f3iќ(6WkiZʦ⤖\qK |ޤ&!,5zԛ싀2#IMCXk'7Azɴn"PnQEc'UBI*MӰŒi-E?ORoR_7=IȣzU̻GDcsP: &p՛V+kGĕg,9_ K&]h>keʖ)C)T-n}jTk{R_7=IqK |ޤ&"/)\)oRz}IME|XȎŸXk'7)aԞdLǛ RoNs3.n6O"sҪz=#%k):'(F޷4lWWbqvR_7=IqK |ޤ&")|)oRz}IME|XȎ· SS1]f<2paam&\3b-A Q<3z>49VQFjv*aM̦zbq4_2; _l7yT~aFFIq~aFFIqޣ⾌|~1j3>ik[Q%(Iarɕ.g7TȤV6u&궏+I/٨]M!++m-hL ]Vg!"[ t҇ dwȹm4k#=Sک5MrtdOu9ۊN:/s.Z~!˕)N iWY,}4I5$ """Mi0ڌ:=;B:RQ:vs̕b_^*%-n8y.!R+ q$OF3432fMشcDY4u M|zY~z}8:oM?wyd)pu?Qjϩm^ǒn48MȮd=W2͜%i+3{|s׷hBm:SŮL<[IHK5RHȏ5Dܾlg /ǥqli[)-WIV&UD⛵߆oFbۉ N礡qy:m Ry}#׸QUjmz4ՠmiQdYQT uMjJ~7c)]@(}6G°Q&sY24s=֣W|";(̵xO@J\YdYvgrd|NT[(SNVfwv+-@xCIfLu#KBv;j=deFJhN=[k^ٌk4T吖AE>)xJsqnE{$U̵"bpt?V,4ou UriÖXTlQN_ '>R\,U\}IqnQs_ 'hA;OZ;ƝE> DEvKH7^")LMJ]aڅ9HZN9SuDDmIb5$^`(TJzh,OrlW?6⌾$|sSOC.Q9 UZZѵvvp(Z\BVTGr2XdDMTkmF*7S}Qzr>_Ɣf|j?̹e| eISL9ՊvjӐOFm]ld2܉WLEIS# XSnSBR]2#$lj$VN:*KZ ׾Ŵ+s$򨛭ĜIp!W(΢Rм )4KQ]_`ą)qk-G>sQQ,ms5F[mo4I@#T\|fZw'%,ȑRXhTeQY%FIeI#O]v;|yOBtʎ.9uHo:Ew^՝̨UõBzt$[K2QOZ̎ڏ]p 6 |Ju<Rdw\fk״{L. hfnڒZ41;;w ?Eg_Mdn)iVkW.'LeȔ-fGr?Ĩ;D[9xbj)Co;{FII(=BL_f>M#z-˓}oEOTˑN]4e\Ar3#^+*;~TJC^XNK6慊'UYc[bB$NGFc.n)4ZMsQqՓddhQ&k{=KԶKiĠZ_Yި5"SpR'Nrٱ(Րě܉ZȌ^}'Zs5Olt_ZfJViC*rK[qT%#=MԧQ$]D-EN\gXVDqThə s8Rȕɵf(4G2uD%$HMYJ#N-ZxAb.nDL2R*ؔzv̬zitU$f*{!{[ KNr>p6j%DIinrըȌf/aVG KCrPi;lؕ]̕fgysKi>)+;I/_|ْK)[ukUpzE~r`HbJe%%&DFW$_k2 .sQQ}֋=4*2ҭcRWiL%kIUQdT;cwǛαHD?'LﺲӗTmdQk{O]YʅX;T'ALNj#%iMWjQZPħYQu(JG}%&f{LguT6lֽMRKFNXm>tF!/ߐj9GI4ֹbs!3"y]A;+$335e".U﬈B⭅ɥKvPfe36C m*QJ5CI.""ekjTL"C~BKqfDW;%$DDDI-BlrT+˷^^zfXҵLcډc𽤑'uGFpQ^~*aM̦zbq4_2; _l7yT~aFFIq~aFFIqޣ⾌|~1wIKrc 7Iİ˪KēwiZO*˓:HZ˔Jwwwzp)Mie%m ݧo؊%+Y8~{\7K%p}ĠJZ FEs=W1b8jRm+"Dsq8-&Dj,ّ$r; i܌IIiy \%M%$9t r#ɬ+qYwBݪW)4~Kw1ƛ!ޙxq{oǨThV9ZIkRm:e&qe f}hzXj"Q3Qms$YB-ZcыdQ+ݒ=CVN(ɶң$|$8zQj#VNݳ f2d22IԬȎpdZl 5(F6u֧65}}6}XLC>C0&G14ijD^iѯ;{$ȏZ蛨a!Rj,ΛQBIۄdYʢNn3MkG*–# kOi7R՛Vq2]lV V73D*KL,lwcpc0*R6p鞑kԓ֢dw+&~2bhVm-bs4-ŨQCBK\4$JtKsHMEQ] 3ga¹WMPJYpiԲ7]"Dm5ȵfG}&߲tFъta=奾Lͳl̏ek؏i_libgvQ^]K&Q+e[J zo#bYmmɛ>7USj:|i/$ֈ󑶫M"=e_\¼*^-|,}Ygp*rԒI<7 ".Kir-j'؇ӓnf%MdMp,] \dMH#+KqH%Ȼ2- ܌bkv $,9EOJ,j̣3m33񙙟^",wwMA~n.NT/ʤ4-vۥJVn!f&ZͲEdK+e3_; lX>&*H|~k͕J;|#[x m'F_W=ORjQf$OD˄ Ҍ'jLzPUTrz]rS7ʑu+eܻծJJFGcQl5ɘɕWԡ•c͘߸Gs334Rs)+fL*|uȒ-hiԢLQعN=Esoacf^r6F}Y{e4VRVvI[*ݝEIfa ڎ'ZڒڔZI!jQ[Uȉ9ڟվ;ɣ &{-\aLQ*3 *f Z̐mu`/Q1niR7ʫ FY%IQr11V2Rʳ^Ju&4u?ԣX^JJA0˚uE*Fq#y̌e;`˺KÕפԜt̺ 5\wJrטBJ>oƟO}&!f}y{]RT)Uu%(IN6ۭSjX8z똬i[u>oO+Gse"nrwᰵeFKCKftm8(NVz%9(Oq? &:(Ne:GqL3tݕz[6TlzEUAڕ3!'e %(i W#uĊ[AهzE/q E 6m9R"cx\eu*6+DMTkmF*7S}Qzr>_Ɣf85uiZՌ(a ձxF\bc.a%um;O]#=i31\bj⹞ى+l+Z4*WXv֎lWkjK2RDߵn']LZ4GjKv[ˊ2RDߵn']LZ4퇑ھ3\Qߵn'ԫt?b'q\@v2F{ai+g",+WHl-?etê1\ڸg;O]#=i3pbj⹞<)^0Z45+5 t_G[Ḳ_Pmr+i}zrP֏z14JÁ"T?p:^y6#GFlT?p:^q*T&{u|͍F z27HU.YbTfa+2Im e)JHDDKD\+O"gcߴgԭ/qWHl-?et?1\Zj⹞:C&ZVwQ3"ֵlci+g2F{aSo;Nq"5s+Yc6]79Z?wit޴h4|oZs{Oq~  h%[_b.;h%[_b.;$GTK*ZTTD;.dyUF0e%wM}#JO_ 9OMNvM'˦;B>z /t0M'˦;Azӝ{up_`9OMNvM'˦;A״\'࿑s4.֜OMNvi1ָO#i>]79 4.֜^cpGC4|oZsi>]79Z?w9OMNvM'˦;C״CpGC4|oZsi>]79Z?wit޴h4|oZs{Oq~  ]79 4.֜^cpGC4|oZsi>]79Z?wit޴h4|oZs{Oq~  ]79 4.֜^cpGC4|oZsi>]79Z?w:6Vqy,Q̉\n!j;T*5ړt!=vg=:]O{ENw:W/d S'i xD{"UzAn++1" 9HHəMoӳms"r]u3hmEVsxB]:zI%im %fi2QGoYjFoIQqĺK91]Fzɔ$)jm$FI"Ig% 1*ʇ d-4'FMkRHdK!j3Ӧ4}lji= (0T)Ns}+Q&WeuS U8KJRN:_IFWeV;nk"[ +_6]^WdeO6]k2 ~Fx ['[IBs(zc9c"[ Q{Iѧ[}<ˈqJBТ4'K=jww}n<ڄ*k$qjK}BL{uLeǔ+) i#k_X&Vʶ\kA OYT$g[ fIMWײЃc.1rȘа6^y%X"[JNW-r}O׳>ƙDh#O:FyLGbEQ۝YTYѶhm.Es2fV#f:)`pUΞu.mMf]Si"9ә$ddeGKaÒ` 79tޡ͵XE6\Gaj՚} ͩDxNe"+-g)["OV?r"aS"OQ8:χ/N7zMf]Si"9ә$ddeGKakQWL=Zj8R~t:f%z7|0)̹ JtDZ=&ٌzC[aCjbT#ql*KvY#1pX+ip΄[3+qj_$A "4X̎mW+ꍊqr[I}+!X\kmWP8=U cJ9;oNfS>MrQ~ jn3ehގ).S5˒\ר3 5iod^' X).K nΚRlv.W;;QTõPPyD*fDIMV3-:Dlo OTO'3n#a jRu"ЩB%y.Ɣ_=Mo\kYG,RVǜӚlq6B%e;j##;ZB04ZVFv;-Ei9FؒLq4Qb%J7MChIK+ax_]:1jڗGK{λ;oNfS>MrQ~ bW"h4uj{&b\fSi2A<}h뭰yĶi5-k;%$Za 5iӃiۧRL"Zn^8f<'BmgYe$j̢?Y TlT9Ng#$kYlgkp8 #3Vr~bfUwZ"7>[j-fvDyNr}V9PhSV|Zf}y96 Y Wif@NĘʍP}ï3+Eivg>:DlYTT 'Tb:(bJXvsONiqƛ<ek$c*3x]Eˀʉ*'l#mZCiNcvK2nFГYgtW#Q hMZ9ԌN5>ku*lYijK(y"Q%DFW.MnM=MFeo,Dj4(dҦKI#9;oNfS>MrQ~ %n : ŷ$79I's,X*A[Q5"U;5mbȢJJUmwKV3Ymɖj)G@]\@ԷjtlQkSJKgb#1χ/N7R֬ŴEOV#ttQcJugOFfReBiH<$gD,uB2=Jm\Qr{FF9a5 :*1^$'kLQ@b뛧 Us*Sjp*Jʓ3Qk.[lٴYRAfRȊn6BHIrf"3r RT欞ќ"%dͶG3Pz_CK[,9fyCxٞtP難yCIHO2Q<z=fn*0OG%^zZ4%%BFćU(lTu'>+|r eN*Q1j3wP B&ڌV+jj>FPn+9͵IrS8De('mYEřW(;[U,JTnmLE.MNB`NTy m ̄$V=\^"ZEJoj\poFJMGYlQ>qiiӲś|#NwNUuP3Ӊ"Y[+"iQeg{O+*_VM_%e^_u`E$Fa 1]D #Ug={LƃkjՂQ.ASc*CHuK3I&5w__Ql"!~)խ(I]-~+ԫ(]OѺ4J$*<ŮCIӰS&Mζj"[ia7;kG{r 8k,&ڔS5)Yܮb=k w^ PTJSJ(Z{s=JUu#}-=KBʪS.7Я}Uhpf%XmdMw-F]lW*N$^. G1Q?K4DFDGdK/Uae!48K$RNBMfySgA0*jq "R74^2AR%VZ,GM_Zk%g{.=݄jn7E"HlU%H6*7&ig^MPR٨GI7fe̒-j.CqwM񾝽Z٭kjk[Uf`$ꌪ]R>roHr%DFVIjv6J)i]Ooӹ1Qm~N?Kz]魟&B˚گk^75/GM6(eM j""-*xcR|Oi SO+-Q;?Z9F[t]?G{ϝY{dq]:].ޟgΜ佳#M©2LΉSDć%eeYa ɳ$xl=E e#|:]ٌ$?P5 ff6RLTe#9 ̵*ܦGc/?5Nf&J*FO'#8!e"λ#շRJ! ♻֪zULIu Qdv QYbˬvn<4;K}m)k&V+%jVk6/+ʻ8KJ}V9A]KJ7;>ޚvΏKY^ٲ\q׎eGR) ; еv*KYحDl%N1$REcMm$Y7ZY^f쐦ůRl4LM)ekz~!>620ʼQ6hbcۃ:o\<xu/.kmYrNzCߣ´j;8ۄ̢v;xxD[)e͗/f77 lRmFʝpRVzi[эXakg{HFpskB4wq]9JuMԩFD%ErsJL :rw?uliq [J 9IQj-DydV O uUԩ5[ Z>: RJ)w+M$EbLpnJ46Fȕ{Z3tzN"r0N89ȈV" 'TjO B_/ B5%*}f D<H7%n43qvּ+7-ZEapP:^Ⴀ>A ZOo8fXv f>dZ6Д03$Լ;Ld ٩0ԩⲆ]IBI$IZ9mN?} n ts}-}7s-h:')u{4쌸 am%Z)%9W?\ȿi`BkMJmI%D2AHrDϒRS^(Oީ ~7ô1"qsC S(ke͖o(c~~fb~٨d7:_NRM7P7ڊa?} );b*ڊۮJm<ͦ%Xٴt1 ʾ%-EɺؾG1r* JbL]Ff)_Zҙ ˎ>6fJ#cU2MG)q>$JIX3\3ҲOlT죇+L(H&[mIl􄭨#3jnMv$YIINLi"%(df|b" xnZ`dZu#e3-GFgd!ctqb(ZJ5$1/ (gYHIdVBiΤ*U&ݹh*YJpRmz-V2۰Sf"W( Oj2̌N(+4H$rǹ, iթ룥 3mL%Fdڒ25Zޑm/q_U%Q^HFe)R$d]Y5nYS;H+OѼmJhsK!.QLZv\!w;ʱKth|佲_}^:[b^Qn2LiW%rsmk"#*uN(e[(^nDظynYSl!v,\ڵ+$Y]ٴƝ*iz<Ĵi";w̛*J"4VH!ˣlK5K-$e^;fn6ipt fKp{/t?_lT`/O+ [exj+-6=IRI;hW(R'uBB[Q[uMǕ9īԓ6 ':N-Ԯ;@~VP)ؗy}e*+1]=fĤMZOieDզFazNcIeU1l=mp,m/AY)"l!u fبC#BrJz:ќ:}BfԩRĊEish&FdZȬk\HVR1V&iS2N6hH̍DGej0(S)î) h""Q%rrʨnkJQޑ%hoMk$J岋&U SvqzSjPmЊ[ZliEL=M*fHZTT}c~]AƸsȓ/3I{k\Z<0 ze=s"wX10ZZf$[H${H*Q\XT+֕O̬hFW?͡=$0T *TZ4KMaec#XbͲqG 7Ar$Jb3Sw`y\2I|4ӭeĸӉ%!h;DzioJFn-O)t^z1?{U qQ> gjn=F⾇Y0sǿ󧽢CMR-hqIJ3Y81BhESW+cN7O]֖=T[ _`8VBn3GVӋuo.}[ _`:TbWeX N-ռPuuo.}VQ_4y[ _`8VB#[Q_4yc?OWذYSTfP t嚍)""-v![ _`8VB6E"Ǚ؏i_vά:ҾsƯuo.}[ _`gnfS{b>u}|J-ռPuuo.}u}|J-ռPuuo.}TN2<_eHm%)A|Ul-ռPuuo.}x&RؓA͢*ї5LKh[xt(]:iEj0/M+/fRoO0˥*כ-`W0h8Z_Z2 m-ռPuuo.}cV&[ەJZmV͡ƜIhY]*#dd{He2E(DRn^4+ (]:źNC CDtfE%Bb4=PJH"$"˫`\?OL~WźNqnӯ3op(ٯQK.+3J3ji2TV2k-F"Qh4= q)Q pRswQ3D4[xt(]:E(䨻^66VyJa?.^l3= Cs-Tt.C%)*"Xnӯ[xt 攮otv=K)k}qcX6V$V 3țZ3Ԕz-8VB-ռPucd[H^6I&G%oEi+UM8)Q~\;Iì*#%2QJ2sQؼ[5ƣuo.}[ _`o,6>Qɒ[.m.dJy*\5DjK xocYk!a~%\[xt(]:cAIw1Z:?2,X!QPSiph&iW3gb-g8^LJC+>*՛2JfdW2#CWźNqnӯ5gTC3.fEǭƄ#-i/0sP??ٞDd R  3 bullet"@@Dd F  3 "@@Dd F  3 "@@Dd`  <?Dd`  <?Dd`  <?}DyK _Toc201728076}DyK _Toc201728076}DyK _Toc201728078}DyK _Toc201728078}DyK _Toc201728079}DyK _Toc201728079}DyK _Toc201728080}DyK _Toc201728080}DyK _Toc201728081}DyK _Toc201728081}DyK _Toc201728082}DyK _Toc201728082}DyK _Toc201728083}DyK _Toc201728083}DyK _Toc201728084}DyK _Toc201728084}DyK _Toc201728085}DyK _Toc201728085}DyK _Toc201728086}DyK _Toc201728086}DyK _Toc201728087}DyK _Toc201728087}DyK _Toc201728088}DyK _Toc201728088}DyK _Toc201728089}DyK _Toc201728089}DyK _Toc201728090}DyK _Toc201728090}DyK _Toc201728091}DyK _Toc201728091}DyK _Toc201728092}DyK _Toc201728092}DyK _Toc201728093}DyK _Toc201728093}DyK _Toc201728094}DyK _Toc201728094}DyK _Toc201728095}DyK _Toc201728095}DyK _Toc201728096}DyK _Toc201728096}DyK _Toc201728097}DyK _Toc201728097}DyK _Toc201728098}DyK _Toc201728098}DyK _Toc201728099}DyK _Toc201728099}DyK _Toc201728100}DyK _Toc201728100}DyK _Toc201728101}DyK _Toc201728101}DyK _Toc201728102}DyK _Toc201728102}DyK _Toc201728103}DyK _Toc201728103}DyK _Toc201728104}DyK _Toc201728104}DyK _Toc201728105}DyK _Toc201728105}DyK _Toc201728106}DyK _Toc201728106}DyK _Toc201728107}DyK _Toc201728107}DyK _Toc201728108}DyK _Toc201728108I$$If!vh5 55z55#v #v#vz#v#v:V q `````2#$5 55z55/ / / / p2T$$If!vh5 55z55#v #v#vz#v#v:V &  #$5 55z55/ / / p T$$If!vh5 55z55#v #v#vz#v#v:V O  #$5 55z55/ / / p T$$If!vh5 55z55#v #v#vz#v#v:V   #$5 55z55/ / / p T$$If!vh5 55z55#v #v#vz#v#v:V O  #$5 55z55/ / / p T$$If!vh5 5"5#v #v"#v:V q ̙̙#$5 5"5/ / / p̙̙T$$If!vh5 5"5#v #v"#v:V  ̙̙#$5 5"5/ / / p̙̙T$$If!vh5 5"5#v #v"#v:V 4 ̙̙#$++5 5"5/ / / f4p̙̙T$$If!vh5 5"5#v #v"#v:V 4z ̙̙#$++5 5"5/ / / f4p̙̙T$$If!vh5 5#v #v:V 4 #$+5 5/ / / f4pT$$If!vh5 5#v #v:V 4 #$+5 5/ / / f4pTDyK yK :mailto:k.alverson@unesco.orgDyK yK <mailto:candyce.clark@noaa.govDyK yK 2mailto:dannenmann@un.orgDyK yK 6mailto:p.dexter@bom.gov.au{DyK yK mailto:%66%72%61%6e%63%6f%69%73.%67%65%72%61%72%64@%64%65%76%65%6c%6f%70%70%65%6d%65%6e%74-%64%75%72%61%62%6c%65.%67%6f%75%76.%66%72DyK yK 8mailto:david.green@noaa.govDyK yK <mailto:linniss@coastal.gov.bbDyK yK >mailto:p.koltermann@unesco.orgDyK yK lmailto:%6e.%73%6d%69%74%68@%62%6f%6d.%67%6f%76.%61%75DyK yK 6mailto:g.papad@gein.noa.grDyK yK 2mailto:kj.ramesh@nic.netDyK yK 2mailto:u.wolf@unesco.orgDyK yK :mailto:m.yamamoto@unesco.orgE$$If!vh55'555#v#v'#v#v#v:V `````255'555/ / / / p2T$$If!vh55'555#v#v'#v#v#v:V  55'555/ / / p T$$If!vh55'555#v#v'#v#v#v:V  55'555/ / / p T$$If!vh55'555#v#v'#v#v#v:V  55'555/ / / p T$$If!vh55'555#v#v'#v#v#v:V  55'555/ / / p T$$If!vh555#v#v#v:V ̙̙555/ / / p̙̙T$$If!vh555#v#v#v:V ̙̙555/ / / p̙̙T$$If!vh555#v#v#v:V 4P ̙̙++555/ / / f4p̙̙T$$If!vh555#v#v#v:V 4 ̙̙++555/ / / f4p̙̙T$$If!vh55#v#v:V 4_ +55/ / / f4pT$$If!vh55#v#v:V 4$ +55/ / / f4pTL$$If!vh5"#v":V4l t65"a`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54`$$If!vh5K5#vK#v:V l65K54<T@T Normal G$CJ_HaJhmH nHsH tH\@"\ Heading 1$$ & F@&5;KHPJ\tH X@X Heading 2$$ & Fd@&[$;PJ\tH `@` Heading 3$$ & Fd@&[$5OJPJQJ\tH d@d Heading 4$$$ & F d@&[$6PJ\tH whd@d Heading 5)$$ ;@&^`;5PJ\tH `@` Heading 6!$$ @&^5PJ]aJtH DA@D 6Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k@(No List .)@. Page Number8O8 Marge $a$PJtH JOJ (i)"$ & F d[$a$PJtH B @"B Footer  SPJmH sH tH @&@1@ Footnote ReferenceH*d@Bd  Footnote Text  V<^`VCJPJaJtH <@R< Header   CJPJtH :@: TOC 1 $ 5;FOrF (c)&$ NO;^O`;a$FOF (ii)# & F 0^`0POP TIRET bul$$ & F xdH$\$a$F@F TOC 2 $;x^`;;H@H TOC 3 $ ;^`;5@@@ TOC 4 ;^`;6@6 TOC 5 ^6@6 TOC 6 ^6U@6 Hyperlink >*B*phTOT Heading chapter $ & Fa$OJQJbOb Series title 1! & F;CJ$OJQJ\^JaJ$BO"B Series title 2" 56]@O2@ centre text #$a$\HOBH TIRET - $ & F d^`>OR> Indent (a) % & F5\PObP quotation &$xx]^a$6HOrH ANNEX 'd\$5OJQJ\mH sH rOr Participant categories ( & F5;CJOJQJ\mH sH fOf Participant affiliation)x5CJOJQJmH sH POP Participant detail* CJmH sH hOh jaParagrafo numerato+$ & FG$a$PJhmH sH tH ZOZ Recommendation,5;>*OJPJQJmH sH POP Rec. title -$a$5;OJQJmH sH BOQB paragraph. & F`5XOX o<Tiret,/$ & F S^S`a$mH sH bOb o< TIRET bul 1cm&0$ SH$^S`a$mH sH nP@n l Body Text 21$ G$a$'CJOJPJQJ^JaJhmH sH tHV>@"V {bTitle2$ j9G$a$5PJ\hmH sH tH O2 k indenttext1*3 ,,ddG$[$\$],^,'CJOJPJQJaJhmH nHsH tHv@Cv  Table Grid7:V40 4 G$2OQ2 R WW8Num5z0OJQJtObt R Char3 Char Char Char6 dG$CJOJPJQJaJhtH NOrN R Par7$ 77`7a$PJmH sH tH 2O2 '/ WW8Num5z2OJQJxOx c agenda_item#9 |*$G$^`|#CJOJPJQJaJhmH sH tH`O` lE Caractre de note de bas de pageCJEHO lEAStyle (Latin) Garamond Bold All caps Justified Before: Auto A...;$ & Fx*$G$a$5OJ PJQJ \aJhtH] 245=dXf&) 'bZ $$$ t 2t gt t t u [u u u *v ev v v +w pwbbccddLfMf h hiijjj00|:00|0m|:00|0n|:00|0p |:00|0q |:00|0J |:00|0K |:00|0 |:00|0 |:00 |0 |:00 |0 |:00 |0|:00 |0|:00 |0N|:00 |0O|0hT/P 7)>2\]]_`bbbbbbb/cgccccc)dPddddd#eeeLfMfdfffggg;g|ggggh h h2hphzh{h|hhhhhGiiiijjklFllMnHpgp]qqqqrMrsatwttvwwRxyyy3zz}CUс͈S-Uu“=ŔQB̛Ġߠ:-^%ͤ%sͥ N~ &=K}ڰ N^vSܷw/ջ{Cƿdt4mb(Ri=^Q^t1@=h,j"9\St:Xt~    QW$@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0 @0@0@0@0@0@0 @0@0@0@0@0@0 @0@0@0@0@0@0 @0@0@0@0@0@0 @0@0@0@0 @0@0@0@0 @0@0@0@0 `0@0 `0 @0 @0@0@0@0 `0@0@0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0A 0  @0F&@ 0F&@ 0F&@ 0F&@ 0F&@ 0F&@0F&@0F&@0F&A 0  @0s*@0s*@ 0s*A 0,s*A 0,s* @ 0A 0//*@0/@0/@0/@0/@0/@0/*@0/@0Q7*@0/@09@09A 0//*@0=@0=@0=@0=*@0=@03C*@0=@0 F@0 F@0 F@ 0 F@ 0 F@ 0 FA 0//*@0=I@0SI@0SI*@0=I@0M*@0=I@08P@08P@08P @ 0@0]T@ T0]T@ T0]T@ T0]T@ T0]T@ T0]T@ T0]T@0]TA 0]T]T@0V@0VA T0VA T0VA T0V@0V@0VA 0]T]T@0UZ@0UZA 0]T]T@0\@0\@0\@0\A 0]T]T@0b@0b@0b@0b@0b@0b@0bA 0]T]T@0h@0h@0h@0h@0h@0h@0hA 0]T]T@0{m@0{m@0{m@0{m@0{m@0{m@0{mA 0]T]T@0-t@0-t@0-tA 0]T]T@0\w@0\w@0\wA 0]T]T@0{@0{@0{A 0 ]T]T@0~@0~@0~@0~@0~A 0 ]T]T@0@0@0 @ 0@0N@0N@0N*@0N@0@0@0@0*@0N@0*@0N@0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @ 0 @ 0 *@0N@0z@0z@ 0z@ 0z@ 0z@ 0z*@0N@0>@ 0>@ 0>@ 0> @ 0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0A 0ҳA 0ҳ@ 0@ 0 @ 0@0@0@0 @ 0A 0@0θA 0@0 @ 0@0˻@0˻@0˻@ 0˻A 0˻A 0˻A 0˻A 0˻@ 0˻@ 0˻A 0˿˻:00 80O80+`  ?t !"#$%&'7L_`abt<=Y(I* X  5  T cXrhT/P 7)>i !7#'%&'*+-.Y11r3345e7P9:7<>?ZBCwEEGGOHBIJL#NNQRTUXYZZZ2\]] ^^5^_` b b bbbbbbbbbb/cgccccc)dPddddd#eeeLfMfdfffggg;g|ggggh h h2hphzh{h|hhhhhGiiiijjjklFllMnHpgp]qqqqrMrsatwttvwwRxyyy3zz}CUс͈S-Uu“=ŔQB̛Ġߠ:-^%ͤ%sͥ N~ &=K}ڰ N^vSܷw/ջ{Cƿdt4mb(Ri=^Q^t1@=h,j"9\St:Xt~ "#.Gj ' 5 P o         ! ' = A F L _  K z     P q               QW{$ C;* 5KzSc _!""#$$$$$$$$%'%P&o)*,.0&04D;[;{;<AaDHTMWYY\fBgQgpgiklp,pFtw{x||||||||'}_}}}}}!~H~{~~~~aR€À&01W܁$%&`abde֍YƘQETb=^˵p˺'ǽ5ij|%5w9$)6JNr +GHMijpNOTtuz"fgm\]b,-2`aguv{GHMKLRnos&',TU[ (G-?@AQcdeu  678Jfgy;<=MWXh./?IJZtuvw!0"00+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+!0!0"00?0?0?0?0?0?0?0?0?0?#0?#0?#0?#0?#0?0?0? 00b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0000000000000000000000000000000r30r30r30r30r30r30r30r30r30r30r30r30r300G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G 0.0Z.0Z.0Z.0Z 0 0 ^ ^.0^.0^.0^.0^.0^.0^.0^0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ .0^.0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0 ^ ^.0Hp 0Hp 0Hp 0Hp 0Hp 0Hp.0Hp.0Hp0Hp 0 ^ ^.0wt.0wt 0wt 0wt 0wt 0 0yy0y.0y.0y.0y.0y.0y0y.0y0y.0y.0y 0y0.0.0.00.00.0.0.0 0 0 0 0y0.0.00.00.0.0.0 0.0 90 90 90 90 90 90.0 0.0-.0- 90- 90- 90-.0-0- 0.00 0.0N.0N.0N0N 0.0=.0= 90 = 90 = 90 =.0=0= 00^.0^.0^.0^0^.0^.0^0^ 0.0.0.0.00.00 0.0ƿ.0ƿ0ƿ 0.0.00 0.0t.0t0t 0 .0.0.0.00 0 .0.00 0.0.0.00.0.0.0.00.00.0.0.0.0.0 0 00.0.0 0 0 0 00.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0X.0X.0X 0 0~~.0 0~~.0 0.00'0'0 0 90 90 90 9090 90 90# 90# 90# 9090 90  90  90 90 90 90 90 90  90  90  90  90 90  90  90  90 90'  90'  90'  90 90L  90L  90 90 90 90 90 90  90  90  90 90 90  90  9000'0'0 00 0  0  0   0   0   0   0  0  0  0 0 0 0  0  0  0  0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 00000000000000000000000000000000'0'0 00$0$0$0$0$0$0$;0$0$0$;0$;0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$;0$0$0$0$;0$;0$0$0$0$0$;0$0$ 0$ 0$0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$;0$ 0$0$0$0$0$ 0$0$ 0$0$0$0$0$ 0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$ 0$0$0$ 0$0$0$;0$;0$0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$0$0$0$;0$0$0$0$0$ 0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$0$0$0$'0'00'0 0 0 0   0  0 0  0 0   0   0   0   0  0 0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0  0 0   0   0   0   0   0   0  0 0   0   0   0   0  0 0   0   0  0 0   0  0 0   0   0   0   0   0   0  0 0  0 0   0   0   0   0   0 00@0@0@0@0@0@000@0@0I00@0I00@0I00@0I00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0I00<00000000000000+`  ?t !"#$%&'7L_`abt<=Y(I* X  5  T cXrhT/P 7)>i !7#'%&'*+-.Y11r3345e7P9:7<>?ZBCwEEGGOHBIJL#NNQRTUXYZZZ2\]] ^^5^_` b b bbbbbbbbbb/cgccccc)dPddddd#eeeLfMfdfffggg;g|ggggh h h2hphzh{h|hhhhhGiiiijjjklFllMnHpgp]qqqqrMrsatwttvwwRxyyy3zz}CUс͈S-Uu“=ŔQB̛Ġߠ:-^%ͤ%sͥ N~ &=K}ڰ N^vSܷw/ջ{Cƿdt4mb(Ri=^Q^t1@=h,j"9\St:Xt~ "#.Gj ' 5 P o         ! ' = A F L _  K z     P q               QW{$ C;* 5KzSc _!""#$$$$$$$$%'%P&o)*,.0&04D;[;{;<AaDHTMWYY\fBgQgpgiklp,pFtw{x||||||||'}_}}}}}!~H~{~~~~aR€À&01W܁$%&`abde֍YƘQETb=^˵p˺'ǽ5ij|%5w9$)6JNr +GHMijpNOTtuz"fgm\]b,-2`aguv{GHMKLRnos&',TU[ (G-?@AQcdeu  67gy;<=MWXh./?IJZtuv!0"00+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+!0!0"00?0?0?0?0?0?0?0?0?0?#0?#0?#0?#0?#0?0?0? 00b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0000000000000000000000000000000s30s30s30s30s30s30s30s30s30s30s30s30s300G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G 0.0Z.0Z.0Z.0Z 0 0 ^ ^.0^.0^.0^.0^.0^.0^.0^0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^40^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^0^ 0^ 0^ 0^0^ 0^ 0^ 0^0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^0^ 0^0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^.0^.0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0^ 0 ^ ^.0Ip 0Ip 0Ip 0Ip 0Ip 0Ip.0Ip.0Ip0Ip 0 ^ ^.0xt.0xt 0xt 0xt 0xt 0 0yy0y.0y.0y.0y.0y.0y0y.0y0y.0y.0y 0y0.0.0.00.00.0.0.0 0 0 0 0y0.0.00.00.0.0.0 0.0 90 90 90 90 90 90.0 0.0..0. 90. 90. 90..0.0. 0.00 0.0O.0O.0O0O 0.0>.0> 90 > 90 > 90 >.0>0> 00_.0_.0_.0_0_.0_.0_0_ 0.0.0.0.00.00 0.0ǿ.0ǿ0ǿ 0.0.00 0.0u.0u0u 0 .0.0.0.00 0 .0.00 0.0.0.00.0.0.0.00.00.0.0.0.0.0 0 00.0.0 0 0 0 00.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0Y.0Y.0Y 0 0.0 0.0 0.00'0'0 0 90 90 90 9090 90 90$ 90$ 90$ 9090 90  90  90 90 90 90 90 90  90  90  90  90 90  90  90  90 90(  90(  90(  90 90M  90M  90 90 90 90 90 90  90  90  90 90 90  90  9000'0'0 00 0  0  0   0   0   0   0  0  0  0 0 0 0  0  0  0  0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 00000000000000000000000000000000'0'0 00$0$0$0$0$0$0$;0$0$0$;0$;0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$;0$0$0$0$;0$;0$0$0$0$0$;0$0$ 0$ 0$0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$;0$ 0$0$0$0$0$ 0$0$ 0$0$0$0$0$ 0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$ 0$0$0$ 0$0$0$;0$;0$0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$0$0$0$;0$0$0$0$0$0$0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$000'0'00'0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  0 0   0   0  0 0   0  0 0   0   0   0  0 0   0   0  0 0  0 0   0   0   0   0   0 00@0@0@0@0@0@V 0 00@0@0@0@0@0K00K00܆-@0K0 0 @0@0@0K00M3K00KK0 0K0 0K0 0K0 0 l@0K00J<5@0@0@0{00(q@0@0@0K040?5TR@0@0@0K070;8R@0K0"0<#\P@0@0@0K0&0'g@0@0@0K0*0+Ph@0@0K0&0'Q-@0@0@0K040"5R@0@0@0K0405@0@0K090 :Ў-@0@0@0C0B0,CPV@0@0C0E0,FV@0@0@0K0C0D|T@0@0K0B0 C`T@0@0@0C0H0IU@0@0K0I0J-@0@0@0@0@0@0@0K0Q0RV@0@0C0X0YV@0@0C0\0]8W@0@0C0^0_pW@0@0K0Y0ZX@0K0S0I0S0I0S0K0S0T]@0@0I0f0I0f0gT= 00 """""""""Gqqs+MMM``KKKKee+++++X @ 8 p b  p ?+4uJcE`<D')(R{8fB%R*a58?:<K?AcM~ř!r~wS  a e3)-[      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0357?FHKLOSX[]^_`acegsvwz|& 'Bw#cфUŅ;ѽZD%b&r'?)S*17 BcMI {o$~o ]N   }  `  K  l  a:3k 7^771[124689:;<=>@ABCDEGIJMNPQRTUVWYZ\bdfhijklmnopqrtuxy{Zx79:<\q8:;=]l8TVWYy#%&(Hu (DFGIi %'(*Jn    % 7 S U V X x     < g  / 2 3 5 U     < g  2 N Q R T t A]`acb-b/bb@mRz:dxOz :Q H ` !J!]!!"""""z###l$$$k,DF X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X%̕ XXXXXXXXXXXXX  8?B\cg$'@GJ>EG%(KRUx!4!4!4!4!4!4!4!4!4!4!4!4!4!4!4!4!!4!4!4  /Xb$60ᴅm8*8wR$H(xBTWXg@fH 0(  X(  v  C FA.?IOC-noir ss txt -100mm  d].A?. `TT`TT"`B S  ?`$%x t#@ _Toc23755503 _Toc196727145 _Toc196733124 _Toc196733723 _Toc196734150 _Toc196816282 _Toc196819789 _Toc196819910 _Toc201727979 _Toc201728071 _Toc196727146 _Toc196733125 _Toc196733724 _Toc196734151 _Toc196816283 _Toc196819790 _Toc196819911 _Toc201727980 _Toc201728072 _Toc196727147 _Toc196733126 _Toc196733725 _Toc196734152 _Toc196816284 _Toc196819791 _Toc196819912 _Toc201727981 _Toc201728073 _Toc196727148 _Toc196733127 _Toc196733726 _Toc196734153 _Toc196816285 _Toc196819792 _Toc196819913 _Toc201727982 _Toc201728074 _Toc23755149 _Toc23755504 _Toc23755150 _Toc23755505 _Toc196727149 _Toc196733128 _Toc196733727 _Toc196734154 _Toc196816286 _Toc196819793 _Toc196819914 _Toc201727983 _Toc201728075 _Toc196819794 _Toc196819915 _Toc201727984 _Toc201728076 _Toc196727150 _Toc201727985 _Toc201728077 _Toc196816287 _Toc196819795 _Toc196819916 _Toc201727986 _Toc201728078 _Toc196727151 _Toc196816288 _Toc196819796 _Toc196819917 _Toc201727987 _Toc201728079 _Toc196727152 _Toc196816289 _Toc196819797 _Toc196819918 _Toc201728080 _Toc201727988 _Toc201728081 _Toc201727989 _Toc201728082 _Toc201727990 _Toc201728083 _Toc201727991 _Toc201728084 _Toc201727992 _Toc201728085 _Toc201727993 _Toc201728086 _Toc201727994 _Toc201728087 _Toc201727995 _Toc201728088 _Toc201727996 _Toc201728089 _Toc201727997 _Toc201728090 _Toc201727998 _Toc201728091 _Toc201727999 _Toc201728092 _Toc201728000 _Toc201728093 _Toc201728001 _Toc201728094 _Toc201728002 _Toc201728095 _Toc201728003 _Toc201728096 _Toc201728004 _Toc201728097 _Toc201728005 _Toc201728098 _Toc201728006 _Toc201728099 _Toc201728007 _Toc201728100 _Toc201728008 _Toc201728101 _Toc201728009 _Toc201728102 _Toc201728010 _Toc201728103 _Toc201728011 _Toc201728104 _Toc201728012 _Toc201728105 _Toc201728013 _Toc201728106 _Toc201728014 _Toc201728107 _Toc201728015 _Toc201728108 _Toc196727165 _Toc196733149 _Toc196733748 _Toc196816311 _Toc196819819 _Toc196819938 _Toc201728016 _Toc201728109 _Toc196727166 _Toc196733150 _Toc196733749 _Toc196734180 _Toc196816312 _Toc196819820 _Toc196819939 _Toc201728017 _Toc201728110 _Toc196727179 _Toc196733163 _Toc196733762 _Toc196734193 _Toc196816325 _Toc196819833 _Toc196819952 _Toc201728018 _Toc201728111 _Toc201728019 _Toc201728112 _Toc196727181 _Toc196733165 _Toc196733764 _Toc196734195 _Toc196816327 _Toc196819835 _Toc196819954 _Toc201728020 _Toc201728113 _Toc201728021 _Toc201728114 _Toc196727184 _Toc196733168 _Toc196733767 _Toc196734198 _Toc196816330 _Toc196819838 _Toc196819957 _Toc201728022 _Toc201728115 _Toc201728023 _Toc201728116 _Toc196727186 _Toc196733170 _Toc196733769 _Toc196734200 _Toc196816332 _Toc196819840 _Toc196819959 _Toc201728024 _Toc201728117 _Toc196727187 _Toc196733171 _Toc196733770 _Toc196816333 _Toc196819841 _Toc196819960 _Toc201728025 _Toc201728118+++++++++?????????&&77bbbbbbbbbr3s3s3s3s3s33GGGGZZ ^ ^^^HpHpwtwtyyyy--NN==^^ƿƿuuXX~~           $$$$$$$$$$$  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123458679:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~**********_________>>>>>>>>>sssssssss''JJsssssssss333333GGGGGZZ^^4^4^fpfpttyyyy]]}}IIuu..ss           $$$$$$$$$%%S ̪(T  (U L(V lW TX G*Y \Z  [ T!\  >   ? O /   p , t d?  2 , ܇ @ t   T 1. 4 ̌" $ 1. 4 ^ 0 , ԅ  4 t  Ԉ   Z LZ Z Z  [ L[ [   -* ,@* K Lx ,.* $  ̋ D7 ܌0 \ \ T1. \0 LL*   77@@IZyzzz -ׅφ77 ..&ƿƿϿss|((UU    *99   p!!!!d"d"n"""8#>#>#!$0$0$2229595;?;?B?i&&/@T22      !"#$&%')(*,+-./0123456789:;@<=>?ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXZY[\]^_`abcedfghjiklnmopqrsvtuwxyz{|}~<<HQQZzzzz3߅؆>>22/ο׿׿{--ZZ    /?? ##  ,,  s!!!!m"w"w"""=#D#D#&$6$6$222>5>5A?H?H?i.77Ea88   !"#$&%')(*,+-./0123456789:;=>?@<ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXZY[\]^_`abcedfghjiklnmopqrsuvtwxyz{|}~ >?*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PostalCodeiB*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsStreet/http://www.5iantlavalampft-com:office:smarttagsVt*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PersonNamehttp://www.microsoft.comkC*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsaddress0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsV*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/h~*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags_}*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-regionhttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/if*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsState0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsZu*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceTypehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/Zv*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceNamehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/ ~}~}~vut}~}~~}f~}}}vuvuvuvu}~~}CB~f?}~}vu}CB}CB~}}t~}CB~}~}~}~}~vutvuvvvuvuf~1;&#'nr' 5 ""%%%**666666y88]:d:JJLLPP>^D^\edeeeggdlhl(m0m^nhnIoSooprryyzzR{W{}}~~~~CKLVdoсہ܁nvֈ܈@E29ԐڐBJKU|370:9=15FRfk²Dz ?K  ,JOrvdh'5 ^bnr/3Y].1 nrae48bf{w{jndh#05 "  b!l!!!!!!!E"N"O"U"""*#1#$$'$,$++1 166F:J:;;<<g@k@.C4CiDmDHHIIIIcMgMtOxOQQ \\``g g\n_nooFt{ԍ֍ԎՎ=>^_˺̺ͺ' kqki~wrvN{JOmv#S!V!(M0MSSS$Tll7?9AQW  !!23@5B5]?i?AAPQ*R6R|h~hFtww{zՍ֍XYŘƘPQݣ<=]^Y˺&7iAw89Nru,F-1QUuy3333333333333333333333333333333xXr\$ 3\4bbijlqmn%ossy3zUс-2ŔB̛OUsz-^ͥN=K3:Nv@w{tumRi=+^V1@,eet(!#.jo              ! " L M _      P Q q r         Q %'%0&0p,px||||}}!~H~À&1&Tb˵%5+HpO"gb-2agv{HML,U[(G-ac /:;m &     ~1MKp %_uxa(`-$/Rq'tcP0Fֳ;@2TM3\$P4$(Ym6PsXB|>mYKn_#kpܬueyR+^`) 5s5^5`sOJQJ^JHH^H`OJQJF5s5^5`sOJQJ5s5^5`sOJQJ^`)^`)88^8`.^`.^`.pp^p`.  ^ `.@ @ ^@ `.  ^ `.^`.^`)5s5^5`sOJQJ^`)]s]^]`sOJQJ ^`OJ QJ ^J o^`OJQJh h ^h `OJQJ 88^8`OJ QJ ^J o^`OJQJ^`OJQJ ^`OJ QJ ^J oxx^x`OJQJ ^`OJQJCJ"  ^`OJQJCJ  pp^p`OJQJCJ"  @ @ ^@ `OJQJCJ"  ^`OJQJCJ"  ^`OJQJCJ"  ^`OJQJCJ"  ^`OJQJCJ"  PP^P`OJQJCJ" 77^7`OJQJ. 77^7`OJ QJ ^J )pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.5s5^5`sOJQJ655s5^5`sOJQJ ^`OJ QJ ^J opp^p`OJQJ@ @ ^@ `OJQJ ^`OJ QJ ^J o^`OJQJ^`OJQJ ^`OJ QJ ^J oPP^P`OJQJ5s5^5`sOJQJ^`)^`()^`() L ^ `L.X X ^X `.((^(`.L^`L.^`.^`.hLh^h`L. n:^n`:o(hH()^`)|^`||^`|.|^`|..|^`|... ^` .... ^` ..... `^`` ...... `^``....... pp^p`........s^`sOJQJ77^7`)88^8`.^`.^`.pp^p`.  ^ `.@ @ ^@ `.  ^ `.^`.0^`0o(()^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.^`()^`() L ^ `L.X X ^X `.((^(`.L^`L.^`.^`.hLh^h`L.;^`;o(()^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.^`QJ o(- ^`OJ QJ o(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o PP^P`OJQJo(--^-`o(0^`56789;<CJH*OJQJS*TXo(. 0^`056o(..0^`0o(... ^`o( .... ^`o( ..... e`e^e``o( ...... e`e^e``o(.......   ^ `o(........h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJ QJ ^J o(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJ QJ ^J o(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJ QJ ^J o(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH  ^` o(hH.  ^` o(hH. 0^`0o(hH.. 0^`0o(hH... 88^8`o(hH .... 88^8`o(hH ..... `^``o(hH ......  `^``o(hH.......  ^`o(hH........d^`56CJOJQJ^Jo(%^`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.^`56B*CJOJQJo(ph ^`OJ QJ o(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o PP^P`OJQJo(( ; ^ `;56B*CJOJQJo(phhH.>;^`;56789;<CJH*CJOJQJS*TXo(hH.;^`;56o(hH.. 0^`0o(hH... 88^8`o(hH .... 88^8`o(hH ..... `^``o(hH ......  `^``o(hH.......  ^`o(hH........^`()^`() L ^ `L.X X ^X `.((^(`.L^`L.^`.^`.hLh^h`L.^`()^`() L ^ `L.X X ^X `.((^(`.L^`L.^`.^`.hLh^h`L.^`) ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h^`56o(hHh^`56OJQJo(hHh pLp^p`LhH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h PLP^P`LhH. M3Rq'Ym6Kp uxP4P0uey(` sXB@2_ #kpmYKn_&WW8Num2WW8Num3WW8Num4WW8Num5WW8Num6WW8Num7WW8Num8WW8Num9WW8Num10WW8Num11WW8Num12WW8Num13WW8Num14WW8Num15WW8Num16WW8Num17WW8Num18WW8Num19WW8Num20WW8Num21WW8Num22WW8Num23WW8Num24WW8Num20& z8p        Jr        0                          [|                Q4X        XF%XFddRQXN;`?_\u\T ' ;(DceM pwCGBT^u/}BcL0xk >u =t!I#9$ui$p%i&!j&GI( U(kj()f)*6*D*`*y*q+:,A. '/as0V1,2dN2,3#3<3G69U6u61#7a;7_S8'9$/9C@9n9:\:5+;{ =v=Q>X~>*2@5@ AEABCCK6C >DlE"H}3H?IHdHoI=sIWZJvKYlL?8MtMROcO8CPeTP@QTS(TU_5UCUCXUpWW.YqYsZ"\(\ ]7]U]f]%}_}_%`/a[a ja~a{b c\pcrhfwf+ghjkGklzlm q"r9r~Yr>trvstt!tuFmvl/wp.yNz&U{: |:}k}bt}~ ~,~KS\#SHKRj_G KkKrgzo'53<gDTY}#$t6J^}_-NX"]7-{ l yJ~kRmPkM_RXEoQ'E_(mR tyT"7iv9?e6\;@U%1'Ne\V:gTd0]$*u+:^>N{{sW 0NKTXFSXk,@#^J4I;OpH)>Sm9x* ^WflZ8Rbwx,-v7iuSC?oo<:aSq72Cc {6hAy6h1s?Hg/++#.|w~MGTF1*X[])g[2'`:Z-52IaX&*bnceHF<"bbbbbbbb/cgccccc)dPddddd#eeeLfMfdfffggg;g|ggggh h h2hphzh{h|hhhhhiiijjx||||||||'}_}}}}}!~H~{~~~~aR€À&01W܁$%&`abde6 +GHMijpNOTtuz"fgm\]b,-2`aguv{GHMKLRnos&',TU[Q 7@ mFZ||||www@ @P@@@@@@@@Unknown gz Times New RomanTimes New Roman5SymbolS& z ArialTimes New RomanWSimSunArial Unicode MSqTimes New Roman BoldTimes New Roman7&  Verdana[  MS MinchoJapanese Gothic;WingdingsA& Trebuchet MS9Garamond?5 z Courier New#17hsƦsƦjƦAJBAJBnx4d 2qHX ? fC:\Documents and Settings\v_bonnet\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK89\Report of Experts.dot*Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commissionv_bonnetp_boned&                           ! " # $ % Oh+'0 ( 8D d p | ,Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission v_bonnetReport of Expertsp_boned2Microsoft Office Word@@@jq@jqAJB՜.+,D՜.+,l( px  UnescoR +Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSAK8mailto:m.yamamoto@unesco.orgB6mailto:u.wolf@unesco.org.\mailto:kj.ramesh@nic.netGrmailto:g.papad@gein.noa.grg@6mailto:%6e.%73%6d%69%74%68@%62%6f%6d.%67%6f%76.%61%75-Imailto:p.koltermann@unesco.orglmailto:linniss@coastal.gov.bbR6mailto:david.green@noaa.govymailto:%66%72%61%6e%63%6f%69%73.%67%65%72%61%72%64@%64%65%76%65%6c%6f%70%70%65%6d%65%6e%74-%64%75%72%61%62%6c%65.%67%6f%75%76.%66%72x^mailto:p.dexter@bom.gov.au (mailto:dannenmann@un.org5Tmailto:candyce.clark@noaa.gov_9mailto:k.alverson@unesco.org0_Toc2017281080_Toc2017281070_Toc2017281060_Toc2017281050_Toc2017281040_Toc2017281030_Toc2017281020_Toc2017281010_Toc2017281001_Toc2017280991_Toc2017280981z_Toc2017280971t_Toc2017280961n_Toc2017280951h_Toc2017280941b_Toc2017280931\_Toc2017280921V_Toc2017280911P_Toc2017280901J_Toc2017280891D_Toc2017280881>_Toc20172808718_Toc20172808612_Toc2017280851,_Toc2017280841&_Toc2017280831 _Toc2017280821_Toc2017280811_Toc2017280801_Toc2017280791_Toc2017280781_Toc201728076  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdeghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQSTUVWXY[\]^_`abclRoot Entry FnData >O1TablefWordDocument{SummaryInformation(RDocumentSummaryInformation8ZHCompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q