ࡱ> orlmny bjbj {{W` !|!!!B"B"B"(j#~$B"r&R)***+-.TO-!.++..!!**4זFFF. !*!*F.FFJ*@je:XDB0^AtJ.!<X..F.....F................ &:  JCOMM Observations Coordination Group Fourth Session Hobart, Australia 18-20 April 2011 FINAL REPORT JCOMM Meeting Report No.  FORMTEXT 85 [page left intentionally blank] WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION _____________INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (OF UNESCO) ___________ JCOMM Observations Coordination Group Fourth Session Hobart, Australia 18-20 April 2011 FINAL REPORT JCOMM Meeting Report No.  REF JCOMM_MR_NO \h  \* MERGEFORMAT 85 NOTES WMO AND IOC DISCLAIMERS WMO Regulation 42 Recommendations of working groups shall have no status within the Organization until they have been approved by the responsible constituent body. In the case of joint working groups the recommendations must be concurred with by the presidents of the constituent bodies concerned before being submitted to the designated constituent body. WMO Regulation 43 In the case of a recommendation made by a working group between sessions of the responsible constituent body, either in a session of a working group or by correspondence, the president of the body may, as an exceptional measure, approve the recommendation on behalf of the constituent body when the matter is, in his opinion, urgent, and does not appear to imply new obligations for Members. He may then submit this recommendation for adoption by the Executive Council or to the President of the Organization for action in accordance with Regulation 9(5). World Meteorological Organization, 2011 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication (articles) in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chair, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +(41 22) 730 84 03 P.O. Box No. 2300 Fax: +(41 22) 730 80 40 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland E-mail: Publications@wmo.int IOC (of UNESCO) disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariats of UNESCO and IOC concerning the legal status of any country or territory, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of the frontiers of any country or territory. ____________ C O N T E N T S Executive Summary  HYPERLINK \l "exec_summary" 6 General Summary of the Work of the Session  HYPERLINK \l "exec_summary" 7 Annex I Agenda  HYPERLINK \l "Annex_I" 21 Annex II List of Participants  HYPERLINK \l "Annex_II" 24 ____________ Executive Summary The Fourth Session of the JCOMM Observations Coordination Group (OCG) was held in Hobart, Australia, from 18 to 20 April 2011, at the kind invitation of the Government of Australia. The Session was sponsored by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM). The meeting focused on issues and actions that would help improve the 'systems' aspects of JCOMM, and on collaboration that would appeal and help each individual component. The Group reviewed requirements, refined the implementation goals for the observing networks, and addressed common technical coordination through JCOMMOPS. It noted the need to raise for JCOMM and intergovernmental attention a number of issues relating to the requirements for satellite observations, the fragility of sustained funding for research-supported observing networks critical for weather/seasonal forecasting, the need for the support of navies for deployment in the northwest Indian Ocean, the need to improve high-frequency historical and real-time tide gauge data, and improving support for JCOMMOPS. ____________ General Summary of the Work of the Session Opening The reader is referred to the  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/ocg4" meeting web page which hosts working documents from each network on issues and challenges, background documents, and all of the presentations given at the meeting. The presentations given at the meeting are linked to from within this document by hyperlink with the full URL in footnotes. Welcome and logistical arrangements The Coordinator of the JCOMM Observations Programme Area, Candyce Clark (USA), opened the meeting at 9:00 on Monday 18 April 2011, thanking the Australian Bureau of Meteorology and JCOMM co-president Peter Dexter (Australia) for acting as host. Meeting goals Clark gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7117" presentation outlining the meeting goals. JCOMM coordinates an integrated system of ocean observing, where the system is greater than the sum of its parts. She asked meeting attendees to focus on issues and actions that would lead to this systems perspective, while understanding that collaboration needed to appeal and help to each individual component. The meeting would focus on identifying the intersection between networks and management of common issues, as well as focusing on paths for additional funding. She thanked all the representatives of observing networks in the room for their hard work in making the observing system function. The role of the OCG in a post-OO'09 Framework for Ocean Observations Albert Fischer (IOC) gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7118" presentation on a Framework for Ocean Observations that had been developed by a group sponsored by the international sponsors of the OceanObs'09 conference (21-25 September 2009, Venice, Italy, www.oceanobs09.net). Consultative versions of the Framework for Ocean Observing  HYPERLINK "http://www.oceanobs09.net/wg/outputs.php" document are available on the OceanObs'09 web site. The Framework takes lessons learned from the successes of existing ocean observing efforts, and serves as a guide to the ocean observing community to establish the requirements for an integrated (from physics through biogeochemistry to ocean biology and ecosystems) and sustained global observing system, including the variables to be measured, the approach to measuring these, and the way in which data and products will be managed and made widely available. Framework processes are organized around essential ocean variables (EOVs), rather than by observing system, platform, program, or region. Implementing new EOVs will be carried out according to their readiness levels, allowing timely implementation of components that are already mature, while encouraging innovation and formal efforts to improve readiness and build capacity. A common language and consistent handling of requirements, observing technologies, and information flow among different, largely autonomous, observing elements is introduced. The Framework takes advantage of existing structures, promotes a collaborative system with voluntary participation, and seeks to support self-funding and self-managing elements that together will provide more than the sum of their individual efforts. The Observations Coordination Group recognized its role in coordinating observing networks within the Framework for Ocean Observations. It stressed the role of the observing networks in engaging in a dialogue with the requirements-setting process, providing information on feasibility. The Group recommended that the Framework in setting requirements and observing needs explicitly take into account models and the production of ocean information. Requirements for the Observations Programme Area Review of scientific requirements for climate Fischer gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7119" presentation on the work of the GCOS-GOOS-WCRP Ocean Observations Panel for Climate (OOPC), and on scientific requirements for sustained ocean observations for climate monitoring, research, and forecasting. While the OOPC's main objective was to define these scientific requirements, it recognized that the sustained ocean observing system for climate was the backbone for ocean forecasting and other marine meteorological services. OOPC has been working on promotion and real-time display of simple ocean climate indices, which are visible on its  HYPERLINK "http://ioc-goos-oopc.org" web site. To improve the utility for a more casual user, and to promote messages on how remote ocean conditions can impact human well-being on land through changes in precipitation and extremes, we have developed an inverted view of the ocean climate indices as a web wiki, which focuses on particular land-based regions. For these regions, the prototype wiki page explains how remote ocean conditions affect local climate and display a real-time update of ocean climate indices. Fischer reviewed the updated  HYPERLINK "http://ioc-goos.org/goos-184" 2010 GCOS Implementation Plan, and in particular its requests of the observing networks represented in the OCG. These actions are summarized here, with the relevant team in square brackets: O3: Improve number and quality of climate-relevant marine surface observations from the VOS. Improve metadata acquisition and management for as many VOS as possible through VOSClim, together with improved measurement systems. O5: Complete and maintain a globally-distributed network of 30-40 surface moorings as part of the OceanSITES Reference Mooring Network. O6: Develop and deploy a ship-based reference network of robust autonomous in situ instrumentation for biogeochemical and ecosystem variables. [SOOP, IOCCP, IOCCG, IGBP] O8: Sustain global coverage of the drifting buoy array (total array of 1250 drifting buoys equipped with ocean temperature sensors), obtain global coverage of atmospheric pressure sensors on the drifting buoys, and obtain improved ocean temperature from an enhanced VOS effort. O9: Implement the GLOSS Core Network of about 300 tide gauges, with geocentrically-located high-accuracy gauges; ensure continuous acquisition, real-time exchange and archiving of high- frequency data; put all regional and local tide gauge measurements within the same global geodetic reference system; ensure historical sea-level records are recovered and exchanged; include sea- level objectives in the capacity-building programmes of GOOS, JCOMM, WMO, other related bodies, and the GCOS system improvement programme. O11: Implement a programme to observe sea-surface salinity to include Argo profiling floats, surface drifting buoys, SOOP ships, tropical moorings, reference moorings, and research ships. O13: Develop and implement an internationally-agreed strategy for measuring surface pCO2. [IOCCP] O14: Develop instrumentation for the autonomous measurement of either DIC, Alk, or pH with high accuracy and precision. [IOCCP and research community] O16: Implement a wave measurement component as part of the Surface Reference Mooring Network. [OceanSITES] O18: Plan, establish and sustain systematic in situ observations from sea-ice buoys, visual surveys (SOOP and Aircraft), and ULS in the Arctic and Antarctic. [DBCP, SOT] O21: Establish plan for, and implement, global Continuous Plankton Recorder surveys. O23: Establish a global network of long-term observation sites covering all major ocean habitats and encourage collocation of physical, biological and ecological measurements. [OceanSITES] O24: Development of a plan for systematic global full-depth water column sampling for ocean physical and carbon variables in the coming decade; implementation of that plan. [GO-SHIP] O25: Sustain the Ship-of-Opportunity XBT/XCTD transoceanic network of about 40 sections. [SOOP] O26: Sustain the network of about 3000 Argo global profiling floats, reseeding the network with replacement floats to fill gaps, and maintain density (about 800 per year). O27: Complete implementation of the current Tropical Moored Buoy, a total network of about 120 moorings. [TIP] O30: Deploy a global pilot project of oxygen sensors on profiling floats. [research community and Argo] O31: Monitoring the implementation of the IOC Data Policy. O32, 33, 34, 35, 36: ocean data management procedures, metadata standards, ocean data transport system based on emerging work in WIS, OPeNDAP, implement system of regional specialized and global data and analysis centers for each ECV, data rescue projects O37: cost-effective telecommunication capabilities Review of non-climate requirements and feasibility Operational ocean forecast systems observing requirements Gary Brassington (Australia), chair of the JCOMM Expert Team on Operational Ocean Forecast Systems (ET-OOFS) gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7120" presentation on the activities of the Team and on the impact of ocean observing systems on ocean forecasting. He stressed the importance of altimetry to operational ocean forecast systems, and warned the OCG that a data gap in altimetry might arise in the coming years. A particular challenge of operational systems was dealing with changes in real-time data streams, as there was a latency for operational systems to adapt to such changes. The OCG recommended that all observing networks consult with ET-OOFS (through its chair) regarding planned changes in real-time data stream formats (on DACs, not on the GTS) (Action for observing network data teams and technical coordinators, continuous). Brassington noted that glider data had good potential to contribute to ocean forecasts, but that there was a lack of standardization. The team discussed this item and formulated an action in Section  REF _Ref167797914 \r \h 4.2. Adaptive sampling also had potential to help operational ocean forecast systems to respond with appropriate information and higher skill in emergency situations, such as marine accident and emergency or search and rescue. The team discussed a multi-part and long-term action on exploration of adaptive sampling, including impact studies, leading to eventual proof-of-concept experiments. The steps would be to: identify impacts on forecast (for ET-OOFS), ET-OOFS to seek cost and feasibility information from the observing network side (from Argo, DBCP, SOOP), and ensure continued dialogue (for OCG chair, secretariat) to identify willing forecast centers and network PIs to design a pilot (likely a few years away). Brassington concluded by noting that OOFS systems were making jumps in performance, that there was objective evidence of positive impact of the forecast systems to applications, and developing evidence of the impact of observing systems on forecast skill. Variable focus: GHRSST Ian Barton (Australia), member of the Group for High-Resolution Sea Surface Temperature (GHRSST) Science Team, gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7163" presentation on requirements from the in situ observing networks for SST products. The GHRSST team would like a greater number of radiometric skin SST measurements from VOS ships, and emphasized the importance of accurate SST data with metadata. A test of Argo floats measuring near-surface temperatures was underway and was also likely to help. Barton encouraged group members to also use the GHRSST dataset to help in assessing the accuracy of their in situ SST measurement instruments. The OCG recommended that satellite-ship SST biases be explored in greater detail where metadata is available, for feedback to SOT (by GHRSST, for the next SOT meeting); and requested GHRSST to provide advice on best practice for ship-based SST measurement to SOT. The OCG encouraged use of BUFR for transmission of SST. The OCG requested GHRSST to provide needed specifications for siting of radiometers on commercial vessels (see also item 5.2.6 in JCOMM MR-84, SOT-VI). The OCG noted that a productive dialogue had been established between GHRSST and the DBCP, stemming from the wide use of drifter SST for satellite validation. This had led to the establishment of a joint pilot project for the reporting of HRSST from drifters in BUFR code, the results of which were yet to be evaluated. The OCG encouraged GHRSST and the DBCP to continue with this exercise, and to report back at its next session. Action: for relevant teams to continue providing feedback to GHRSST on feasibility and cost of improved SST measurements from their platforms, by next GHRSST meeting, in particular: SOT: radiometers on ships, underway SST Argo, DBCP, OceanSITES: temperature profiles in upper 2 m Services and Forecast Systems Programme Area Ming Ji (USA), coordinator for the Services and Forecast Systems Programme Area gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7173" presentation on other teams within the SFSPA (ET-OOFS was presented in item 2.2.1). He emphasized the importance of satellite altimetry and scatterometry for operational wave, storm surge, and sea ice science and services. He also highlighted a general lack of adaptive sampling capability in the ocean observing system, which could be used to respond to emergency situations. The OCG took note of the requirements for satellite observations (and in particular concerns about continuous and adequate altimetry, surface vector winds, microwave SST) expressed by the SFSPA for their services and recommended raising this need through JCOMM and other channels including the WMO Rolling Review of Requirements (see item  REF _Ref167977771 \r \h 2.2.4  below), the WMO space programme, CGMS, and CEOS (action for MAN). The OCG acknowledged that it needed to take some action to improve linked understanding of satellite and in situ observing needs, coordination needs, for operational services and more generally. Action for OCG vice-chair (David) to inform ET-WS chair (Val Swail) of wave spectral data available from ship navigation radars, already implemented on a number of ships, and ask ET-WS to evaluate if this will meet their requirements. WMO Rolling Review of Requirements and the ET-EGOS Implementation plan Etienne Charpentier (WMO)  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7167" presented the WMO Rolling Review of Requirements process, and emphasized some gaps in ocean variables needed for non-climate related WMO Application Areas where ocean observations substantially address their requirements (i.e. Seasonal to Inter-annual Forecasts, Ocean Applications, Global Numerical Weather Prediction, High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction, and Nowcasting and Very Short Range Forecasting), bearing in mind that the Climate Monitoring Application Area (GCOS) is already well-covered by JCOMM through its Implementation Goals. Action for OCG chair, WMO secretariat to ensure that observing networks currently funded on limited-lifetime research funding but important for medium-range weather and seasonal climate forecasting be highlighted to WMO Members as potential gaps in the ET-EGOS Implementation Plan (by next ET-EGOS meeting in June 2011). These are in particular the: Tropical moored arrays, Argo, a fraction of barometer upgrades on surface drifters (for weather forecasting), and altimeter, scatterometer, microwave SST, sea ice measurements from Ocean research satellite missions. The meeting agreed that the draft EGOS Implementation Plan had to be further reviewed by JCOMM to better consider the long term aspects of the Vision of the GOS in 2025 (action; JCOMM Co-President; ASAP). Are we meeting the requirements for observing ocean variables? General discussion and feedback for requirements process The OCG had a discussion on how to respond to the different requirements processes, picking up from discussion at the previous (OCG-III) meeting. The OCG recognized a clear role for itself in advancing the feedback loop on requirements by feeding back information on cost and feasibility, and in engaging in pilot projects exploring feasibility/cost and impact where sponsorship can be identified. The OCG agreed that it should endorse promising pilot projects as a way to give authority and help find funding. JCOMM Implementation Goals and Metrics Fischer gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7171" presentation on JCOMM system metrics, noting that they were important in presenting a systems view to an external audience on the ocean observing system, but that in a collaborative voluntary system such as JCOMM, they needed to serve the purposes of the individual observing networks and needed to be simple to calculate. The current JCOMM metrics for completion of the initial in situ ocean observing system needed repair and updating, and the responsibility for calculation network by network clearly defined. He encouraged each group member to think of appropriate and simple metrics of the intensity of effort being put into sustaining the observing system, and suggested the group define some metrics for collaborative objectives, across observing networks. Action: OCG chair and secretariat to work with each observing network to clarify their overall system goal metric(s) and any metrics of network efficiency, intensity of yearly effort, data timeliness and quality that should be reported for high-level systems view. An initial departure would come from this first draft: SOT/VOS: 25% of ships VOSClim-class (500), [at least 20 reports per month per % per month of 5x5 squares with coverage], N/S bias. [from JCOMMOPS] SOT/SOOP: XBTs dropped / 37000 (needed to complete OO'09 lines), % completion of lines. [responsibility?: JCOMMOPS working on linking ships, drops, lines] DBCP/drifting buoys: # of buoys / 1250, Equivalent buoy density: adequacy of coverage: % per month of 5x5 squares with adequate number of observations [average of 1 platform per month, 60N to 60S], N/S bias. Intensity: 1250 floats/years. [from GTS as most robust source] TIP: # moorings active/125 for all 3 tropical basins, [data return rate.] [from JCOMMOPS]. Intensity: ship days [from who? McPhaden] or # of buoys refreshed [automated way of getting this? for TAO yes from THREADS server] GLOSS: 300 stations in GLOSS Core network, real-time data transmission, GPS/DORIS co-location [Mark needs to make information available to OSMC]. Intensity: [estimate $30k/year]? Argo: replace #floats active/3000 by # of floats contributing to core mission [3200, not graylisted], % / month of 3x3 box with adequate coverage [3 profiles per month, 60N to 60 S], N/S bias. Intensity: 800 floats/year (rolling year). GO-SHIP: rolling index of research funding (ship days?) secured to maintain lines; also see data flow index below. [nothing that can be calculated automatically] IOCCP underway carbon measurements: these will need to be defined in collaboration with IOCCP. OceanSITES: number of platforms in the NDBC or Coriolis GDAC as OceanSITES. Intensity: number of buoys refreshed (can be parsed from the OceanSITES data file format) The OCG discussed a challenge that many networks faced related to spreading investment over more countries - action to maintain information about national participation in each network as a top-level metric. Action: OCG chair, secretariat, JCOMMOPS, and national in-kind efforts calculating metrics need to clarify responsibilities for routine production and assembly of these metrics [through meeting summer 2011]. Action: metrics for collaboration within OCG for Argo and DBCP to implement generation of routine information of how many floats/drifters are deployed on research ships, commercial vessels (by JCOMM-IV, then continuous). The OCG identified as a dual collaboration and data system metric: the % of completed GO-SHIP profiles in the Argo reference database: CCHDO. Action: to identify for all observing networks the metrics of flow of real-time and delayed-mode data, in collaboration with data teams. Issues and challenges faced by the observing networks Review of each observing network SOT/VOS Graeme Ball (Australia), chair of the Ship Observations Team presented  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7013" written input provided on behalf of the entire team and of the Voluntary Observing Ship marine meteorological measurement program in particular. The  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/sot6" SOT-VI meeting took place in the week before the OCG-IV meeting, also in Hobart. The SOT encouraged all operators to upgrade to VOSClim class reporting of metadata, and agreed on performance measures. Actions were being taken to shift to the required BUFR format for the GTS. Port Meteorological Officers (PMOs) were important for the VOS but also in helping to find deployment opportunities for other networks. SOT/SOOP Gustavo Goni (USA), chair of the SOT's Ship of Opportunity Programme Implementation Panel gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7172" presentation on the status of the SOOP XBT observing network, including extensive maps and statistics maintained by NOAA/AOML on behalf of the programme. Full implementation of the lines agreed in the OceanObs'09 Community White Paper would require about 37000 XBT drops per year. The major gaps in the network were largely due to a lack of full funding to implement the lines, and only in minor cases on logistics (lack of a ship). Action for SOOP chair to inform CLIVAR/GOOS Indian Ocean Panel of threat to XBT line S. Africa-Australia - as this would be first to be dropped by Scripps if budgets reduced (asap). Action for SOOP chair and IOCCP, to improve collaboration on development of pCO2 lines by linking carbon PIs with SOOP implementers (continuous) DBCP Al Wallace (Canada), chair of the Data Buoy Cooperation Panel (DBCP) gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7180" presentation on the status, issues, and challenges the team faced. The DBCP sponsored a number of pilot projects on satellite telecommunications, on wave measurements from drifters and from moored buoys. The team faced a continuous challenge in filling gaps in the global drifter array, and was working to increase the number of barometer buoys. Action: for DBCP and Argo: to coordinate in contact with navies and coast guards for deployment in NW Indian Ocean. OCG recommended that the IOC Assembly be given this message as well, that navies could offer deployment opportunities (action for JCOMM co-president and OCG coordinator, secretariat). DBCP-TIP Ken Ando (Japan), co-chair of the Tropical Moored Array Implementation Panel (TIP), gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7161" presentation on the status of this network. All 78 planned moorings in the tropical Pacific (the TAO/TRITON array) were in place, implemented by the USA (NOAA) and Japan (JAMSTEC). Korea (KORDI), China (IOCAS), and Indonesia (BPPT) have all shown interest in participating in the Pacific array. All 18 planned moorings in the tropical Atlantic (PIRATA array) were in place, implemented by the USA (NOAA), France (IRD, Mto-France), and Brazil (INPE, DHN). In the Indian Ocean it is planned that 30-32 of the total of the 46 desired moorings (RAMA array) will be in place soon, implemented by a cooperation between the USA, Japan, India, France, Indonesia, China, Australia, and the GEF ASCLME project. Development of new mooring and sensor technology to combat vandalism and to develop new measurements were underway. In the Indian Ocean, particularly in the Northwest Indian Ocean, piracy was a major impediment to implementation (see action under 4.1.3 above). Ando raised two particular common issues: the interaction between global and regional activities and issues (also discussed in Section  REF _Ref167977671 \r \h 5.2), and that key portions of the tropical moored arrays were sustained with research funding, which was in many cases becoming increasingly difficult to justify (see also the Action under Item  REF _Ref167977771 \r \h 2.2.4 ). GLOSS Mark Merrifield (USA), chair of the GLOSS Group of Experts, gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7175" presentation by teleconference on the status and challenges of the global tide gauge network. The GLOSS core network was now about 80% operational, and new initiatives will increase this to 85-90%. The main challenges included cost, the remoteness of some sites, and national engagement. About half (48%) of this network had GPS and/or DORIS geolocation, where cost, maintenance, and national participation were the major barriers to improvement. More than half of tide gauges delivered their data in near-real-time or fast delivery, where the primary impediment was national commitments. GLOSS continued to work on metrics, and expected progress by its next meeting in fall 2011. The OCG noted the importance of historical release of high-frequency tide gauge data for studies improving predictability of extreme water levels - connected to data sharing issues that require diplomatic solutions. It recommended that this be raised at IOC level. Argo Susan Wijffels (Australia), co-chair of the Argo Steering Team, gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7181" presentation on the Argo profiling float array. The core mission is nearly complete, with contributions from 29 countries and the EU (of active floats in the water). The array degraded for the first time in 2010 compared to 2009, in large part due to a deployment halt in 2009 to deal with a pressure sensor problem. Float lifetimes are improving, and some floats now being deployed could last 10 years. The use of Iridium telecommunications is growing. The Argo Data System has made great strides, but faced challenges in dealing with new missions and sensors. Challenges in the near-term included maintaining national contributions, dealing with a delay in deployments and pressure biases, and dealing with velocity data and the diurnal cycle. In the longer term, the community was working to tackle new challenges, including near-surface temperature data, Bio-Argo, the inclusion of glider data, deep profiling floats, Argo under ice, and the need for higher data density in some areas. Cross-challenges with other networks included filling gaps in the network, diversifying support for the international infrastructure including JCOMMOPS, and intercalibration of data streams. Action for DBCP and Argo chairs to explore collaboration in chartering vessels for deployments in data-sparse regions (to bring up at next DBCP meeting). The OCG recommended that OOPC, SOOS, and the Arctic community tackle requirements and observing needs for under-ice zone. (Argo technology is ready) OceanSITES Uwe Send (USA), co-chair of the OceanSITES reference station network, gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7651" presentation on the issues and challenges faced by the network. The OceanSITES team has been debating the definition of an OceanSITES time series site, and in particular how multidisciplinary these sites should be. There is an ambition to enlarge the number of sites. The moored sites are ideal platforms to test new sensors for new variables, although one challenge that the team is working on is the diversity of technologies available and used. Progress has been made by the data system team, with 30-40 platforms on the data system currently, and 60-70 expected in the near future. One challenge has been a lack of project office support for the network. The OCG encouraged OceanSITES to define some clear metrics of success to help focus their efforts and help identify the needed collaboration with other parts of the observing system. Further discussion related to OceanSITES took place under item  REF _Ref167797914 \r \h 4.2 below. IOCCP Maciej Telszewski (IOC), deputy director of the International Ocean Carbon Coordination Project (IOCCP), gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7179" presentation on the goals of the project, and in particular its coordination activities for underway pCO2 observations and carbon time series stations, associated data management systems and synthesis activities. He expressed the willingness of the IOCCP community to cooperate with JCOMM where relevant to both sides. Action: Collaborations to be investigated between SOOP and IOCCP for providing hardware (and airtime) to permit transmission of the SST & SSS data in real-time Action for Telszewski and Goni: SOOP to collaborate for Quality Control of salinity data from pCO2 lines (see also action under item  REF _Ref168110641 \r \h 4.1.2 ) GO-SHIP Bernadette Sloyan (Australia), co-chair of the Global Ocean Ship-based Hydrographic Investigations Program (GO-SHIP), gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7178" presentation on the goals and status of the program. Based on development by CLIVAR and the IOCCP, GO-SHIP's objectives were to provide coordination to achieve a sustained integrated/interdisciplinary repeat hydrography network, facilitating planning, agreement on standards and methods, data management and synthesis activities. The Program had agreed on a list of core and ancillary variables to be observed and agreed on data release requirements. Development plans included the desire to establish a program office, initiating network evaluation from the CLIVAR decadal survey and launching joint planning exercises, and the establishment of a data management committee to promote collaborative action. The Argo data system had an ongoing need for near-real-time CTD profiles to help in quality control. Action for Argo and GO-SHIP to maximize use of research ships for deployment as CTD cast makes these the ideal platform for data quality comparison (for Argo TC, GO-SHIP officer or chairs, continuous). Action for Goni, Wijffels to finalize and publicize the manual for fall rate equation experiments including multiple deployments at the same time. Followup Action for SOOPIP and and GO-SHIP chairs, to maximize possibilities for this work on GO-SHIP cruises. Tim Boyer (USA) is the focal point for receiving this data. Action GO-SHIP to engage with repeat hydrography community about getting CTD profiles our in near-real-time, agree on format, agree on real-time assembly/GTS injection center (some possibilities include: Coriolis, AOML, or CCHDO). This might be on the GTS or a more restricted real-time distribution. Once GO-SHIP has agreement on format and arrangements, Action for GO-SHIP chair to approach SeaBird about generating correct message out of CTD automatically. Discussion of issues raised by observing networks The OCG discussed a number of more general issues during the presentations above and in a separate discussion period, and decided on a number of actions: Action for JCOMM (OCG chair and secretariat) to sponsor a workshop on the potential for gliders to contribute to sustained ocean observing: potential partners: CLIVAR, POGO, GOOS (OOPC) objective: to identify the potential of different modes of operation, necessary technical development, and the need for strategic and technical coordination, data management; to identify some champions OCG chair and secretariat to explore an action with/by SCOR and the biologging community to host workshop on coordination needs in the marine mammal (and other animal tagging) observing community. This community had already organized itself through a series of symposia, the latest of which took place in March 2011 (Biologging 4, http://www.cmar.csiro.au/biologging4/). Concrete action: invitation to next OCG meeting. Action for OCG chair, secretariat, through contact with each observing network chair: to maintain information on major constraints to full implementation (lack of funding, logistics, need for technical coordination, data management issues), so these can be easily raised in high-level fora and documents. (regularly updated) OCG noted importance of generation and publicity of ocean information products (indices, local ocean information) for a larger public in developing advocacy for ocean observing networks OOPC can play a role in publicizing these indices through its indices website and in cooperation with other initiatives. In addition, products such as throughflow, western boundary current characteristics, heat transports, time history of steric height can be used for validation/ intercomparison with models, the PCMDI / CMIP5 project has a lot of interest in these. The OCG encouraged all teams to think about generating some of these products or indices to help in advocacy for their network (Action for all team chairs). These products should be promoted with ET-OOFS, GODAE OceanView, CLIVAR WG-OMD, and the GSOP/reanalysis community. Identifying and working on common challenges and building positive synergies Technical coordination: JCOMMOPS Mathieu Belboch (JCOMMOPS) gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7164" presentation on the status of the JCOMM Observing Programme Support Centre, its support to the DBCP, Argo, SOT, and OceanSITES. and the common infrastructure that had been built. He reported on a new initiative for deployment of Argo profiling floats, using a chartered sailing vessel, the "Lady Amber". He proposed future development of JCOMMOPS with a Cruise Information Centre / Coordinator, noting that a majority of the funds needed to pilot this position for one year (in 2012) were already assembled. He also encouraged other networks (GO-SHIP, IOCCP, gliders, marine mammals) to think of investing in technical coordination building on the synergies of JCOMMOPS. To increase the capabilities of the centre required an increase in investment. The IOC was preparing to renew the MoU between UNESCO and France to formalize JCOMMOPS as an IOC Programme Office according to IOC guidelines. He warned that JCOMMOPS was at a crossroads - that the two technical coordinators presently in their posts were not sufficient to deliver full services to four programmes, and that common resources were limited. He believed there was a way forward, but this would require investment by the host country and by the observing networks to achieve the full vision of JCOMMOPS as a technical coordination service for a system of observing networks. Regarding the ship coordinator proposal: the OCG was generally supportive of the idea as a pilot, but encouraged further refinement in the terms of reference with the panels,to increase the possibility for success. The OCG endorsed the new and creative initiative by the Argo TC for deployment of Argo profiling floats using the charter sailing vessel Lady Amber, and encouraged other in situ platforms to consider using this deployment opportunity to address the increasingly growing problem of decreasing ship time. Action for Mathieu and Albert: follow up with a letter from IOC on an offer from Europe (P-Y Le Traon) for 10k contribution in support of OceanSITES. Noting that the panels supporting JCOMMOPS were fully satisfied of the technical coordination support provided by JCOMMOPS, OCG members emphasized that the coordinator has first priority to serve the individual networks, before working on cross-platform actions, but that they believed integration would bring benefits. OCG encouraged all panels to consider working through JCOMMOPS for technical coordination. OCG noted that new funding will be attached to deliverables and that there will be a clear advantage for a cross-network synergy of JCOMMOPS technical coordinators working together. JCOMMOPS needs both strategic and operational management so that the networks can find accountability for their deliverables based on their investment in the center. The TCs cannot play this management role; rather a stable and appropriate management structure needs to be approved and properly resourced. This structure needs to consider both a funding model based on specific deliverables that also includes funding for a common infrastructure; and an operating model that allows flexibility in how these deliverables are generated, and builds on positive synergy, integration and a common infrastructure. The OCG recognized a need to clarity the person or structure for this management between the panel chairs, OCG, secretariats and JCOMMOPS. In consultation with the panels contributing to JCOMMOPS, OCG requested a strategic and operational plan for JCOMMOPS including clear deliverables, performance targets, and budget including staff costs so that new programs have a clear understanding of the costs. Action: JCOMMOPS (Y. Desaubies and M. Belbeoch), OCG and panel chairs, IOC, WMO to draft strategic and operational plan and budget (including both salary and operating costs) for JCOMMOPS, before JCOMM-IV. The OCG stressed the importance of IOC being proactive in providing the budgeting information and invoicing countries on time, to build trust that money is properly managed for the benefit of the networks and countries. This information should include national contributions to be used for peer pressure. Action for IOC secretariat, continuous. In growing JCOMMOPS, the conversation needs to be between networks not getting service currently from JCOMMOPS and this point person for management, and budget proposals should be developed. OCG also took note of the initiative to find support from JTA and telecommunication service providers for JCOMMOPS. The OCG thanked Mathieu Belboch for his report and pro-active actionsto further develop JCOMMOPS and promote positive synergies between the different components of the global ocean observing system in terms of programme monitoring, and day to day technical support to programme managers for the networks implementation and operations. The OCG encouraged him to continue doing so in close collaboration with the OCG chair, Panels and associated programmes' chairs, and the Secretariat. The interface between national, regional, and global initiatives Tim Moltmann (Australia), director of the Australian Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7176" presentation presenting his perspective on the interface between national and regional initiatives and the global system. There was an area of overlap between JCOMM and IMOS in bluewater physical-chemical observations, notably Argo, SOOP, OceanSITES, and IOCCP, and 1/3 of IMOS investment in facilities supported JCOMM global objectives. He asked the OCG to reflect on how this cooperation could be improved, providing some specific examples including in data discoverability and integration. Steve Rintoul (Australia), co-chair of the SCAR/SCOR Oceanography Expert Group that developed a plan for the Southern Ocean Observing System (SOOS), gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7177" presentation on the role of the Southern Ocean in the earth system, the need for sustained observations, and an overview of SOOS. Many elements of the SOOS existed already and were parts of the global system. SOOS was establishing a project office at the University of Tasmania, as well as a Scientific Steering Committee. For implementation to progress, quantitative targets would need to be established, early wins identified, and a more rigorous experimental design established with a refined sampling plan for biology and ecology in particular. SOOS was establishing a data portal. Rintoul emphasized that SOOS and the global ocean observing system implemented by JCOMM should be fully coordinated, and that SOOS would help to organize a regional activity that was part of the global system. Legacy recommendations from the JCOMM pilot project for WIGOS; standards and best practice Etienne Charpentier (WMO) gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7169" presentation on legacy recommendations from the JCOMM pilot project for WIGOS, a related HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7170"presentation on standards and best practices, and a brief  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7168" presentation on the establishment of Regional Marine Instrumentation Centres (RMIC). OCG endorsed the legacy recommendations of the JCOMM Pilot Project for WIGOS and invites OPA Panels and Associated Programme to address them as appropriate. Action: OCG vice-chair (David) to be focal point for maintaining JCOMM catalogue of standards and best practices. undertake a review of WMO & IOC Publications (WIGOS) Review ongoing actions from the OPA Panels session reports and translating some of them into recommendations/practices to be included in manuals & guides The OPA Panels and associated programmes were invited to compile and document their instrument practices and make recommendations whether they should be promoted through specific guides, JCOMM TRs, or WMO & IOC Publications. The OPA will follow the development of the new WIGOS Manuals and contribute as appropriate (input from Etienne). Action: OCG members to review 'cookbook' for data management when ready. OCG accepts of the decision by MAN, based on the recommendations by the pilot project which was acting on behalf of the OCG, on the procedures for accreditation of RMICs and the approval of the first two centers in the USA and China. Technology infusion and pilot projects David Meldrum (UK), vice-coordinator of the OCG, gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7174" presentation with suggestions for pilot projects across the Observations Coordination Group that would be of benefit to multiple networks, based on the discussion held at the meeting. Action to maintain communication on DBCP tender process for telecommunications with the rest of the interested teams in OCG (for DBCP chair and OCG coordinator). Action: inform OCG members on development of seabed cable observation talks with ITU and providers (for Meldrum). The OCG recommended continued effort on sensor development for Argo, surface drifters, moorings (with a particular focus on ocean carbon system) Data management Sissy Iona (Greece), Coordinator of the JCOMM Data Management Programme Area, gave a  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7375" presentation outlining activities of the DMPA with particular relevance to the OCG, and focusing on what DMPA could contribute to the teams in the OCG, and what was needed from those teams in order to advance. Action: OCG panels to submit documentation on their data and metadata standards for implementation of the WIGOS pilot project. OCG recommends a better link between the individual network data teams and the JCOMM Data Managment Programme Area and IODE efforts. OPA members are invited to contribute to the training course in encoding/ decoding BUFR for real-time data transmission (need to insert details). Ocean Data Portal - DMPA invited to contact the individual network DACs to provide the needed information to make network data discoverable through the ODP (working through Mathieu for the panels he coordinates). The OCG recommended engaging data management community in IODE/JCOMM in a review of the historical thermal dataset. Work plan, milestones, and recommendations The OCG reviewed a draft list of the decisions, recommendations, and actions decided by the coordination group which form the basis of this report. Issues to raise at the JCOMM-wide and intergovernmental (WMO, IOC) level The OCG briefly reviewed a number of actions in which JCOMM or high-level (WMO, IOC) intergovernmental attention would be needed. These actions can be found in sections:  REF _Ref168118756 \r \h 2.2.3  (requirements for satellite observations),  REF _Ref167977771 \r \h 2.2.4  (fragility of sustained funding for research-supported observing networks critical for weather/seasonal forecasting),  REF _Ref168118827 \r \h 4.1.3  (support of navies for deployment in the northwest Indian Ocean),  REF _Ref168118955 \r \h 4.1.5  (exchange of high-frequency historical and real-time tide gauge data), and  REF _Ref168119587 \r \h 5.1 (JCOMMOPS). Closing Clark thanked all the participants for blocking out the time and participating actively in the meeting, the local host and Peter Dexter, and the members of the IOC, WMO, and local secretariat. She closed the meeting at ___________ Annex I Agenda 1Opening Monday AM 9:00-9:15. The fourth session of the JCOMM Observations Programme Area Coordination Group (OCG) will open Monday 18 April 2011 at 9 am, at Old Woolstore Hotel, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Candyce Clark, OPA Coordinator, will chair the session.1.1Welcome and logistical arrangements 9:15-9:30. Peter Dexter, JCOMM Co-President, and the local host will welcome participants. Albert Fischer, IOC secretariat, will review the provisional agenda, documents, and timetable, and the meeting will adopt or modify them.1.2Meeting goals 9:30-9:45. Clark will provide a quick overview of the meeting goals: a sharing of experience and status amongst the observing networks, identifying best ways to take advantage of new technologies (sensors, communications), improving observing programme support, and identifying other areas of common work.1.3The role of the OCG in a post-OceanObs'09 Framework for Ocean Observations 9:45-10:15 (20 min presentation + 10 min discussion). presented by Fischer. Draft consultative Framework recommendations document available.2Requirements for the Observations Programme Area (OPA)2.1Review of scientific requirements for climate 10:45-11:05 (15+5 min). Fischer will review changes in the GCOS Implementation Plan 2010 version, the draft update to the GCOS Satellite Supplement, and outcomes from the OOPC Deep Ocean Workshop (30 March - 1 April 2011).2.2Review of non-climate requirements and feasibility2.2.1Operational ocean forecast systems observing requirements 11:05-11:25 (15+5 min, might be delayed to after 2.2.4). Gary Brassington, chair of the JCOMM ET-OOFS, and Andreas Schiller, co-chair of GODAE OceanView, will discuss requirements for ocean observations to support ocean forecast systems. Short Doc 2.2.1 available.2.2.2Variable focus: GHRSST 11:25-11:45 (15+5 min). Ian Barton, member of the GHRSST science team, will address requirements from in situ observing networks for SST products. Short Doc 2.2.2 available.2.2.3SFSPA further observing requirements: waves, storm surges, ocean-related hazards, sea ice 11:45-12:05 (15+5 min). Ming Ji, JCOMM Services and Forecast Systems Programme Area (SFSPA) coordinator, will present further observing requirements for teams in the SFSPA. Short Doc. 2.2.3 available.2.2.4WMO Rolling Review of Requirements, ET-EGOS Implementation Plan 12:05-12:25 (15+5 min). Etienne Charpentier (WMO) will present specific requirements for marine and ocean observations from the WMO Rolling Review of Requirements process. Short Doc. 2.2.4 available.3Are we meeting the requirements for observing ocean variables?3.1Discussion: feedback for the requirements-setting processes Monday PM 13:45-14:30. Clark will lead a discussion on feedback from the observing networks for the requirements-setting processes, and the process of matching requirements with funding for new observational capability.3.2Review of the current JCOMM OPA Implementation Goals (network-based goals) 14:30-14:45. Clark will present the current status of OPA Implementation Goals and the meeting will identify needed updates. Doc 3.2 (OPA Implementation Goals: to be revised) available.3.3JCOMM metrics 14:45-15:05. Fischer will review the current state of JCOMM metrics (network-based and variable-based), and the meeting will identify steps to improve them, including needed technical support.4Issues and challenges faced by the observing networks4.1Quick review from each observing network of issues and challenges faced Reports focused on key issues and challenges with a particular emphasis on areas of cooperation across networks, while a written document for each network will summarize status as well as issues and challenges.4.1.1SOT - Volunteer Observing Ships (VOS) 15:30-16:00 (15 min presentation+15 min discussion). presented by Graeme Ball, chair JCOMM SOT. Doc 4.1.1 available.4.1.2SOT - Ship of Opportunity Programme (SOOP) 16:00-16:30. presented by Gustavo Goni, chair SOOPIP. Doc 4.1.2 available.4.1.3Data Buoy Cooperation Panel (DBCP) 16:30-17:00. presented by Al Wallace, chair DBDP. Doc 4.1.3 available.4.1.4Tropical Moored Buoy Implementation Panel (DBCP-TIP) 17:00-17:30. presented by Ken Ando, JAMSTEC. Doc 4.1.4 available.4.1.5Global Sea Level Observing System (GLOSS) Tuesday AM 9:00-9:30. presented on behalf of Mark Merrifield, chair GLOSS/GE. Doc 4.1.5 available.4.1.6Argo 9:30-10:00. presented by Susan Wijffels, co-chair Argo Steering Team. Doc 4.1.6 expected.4.1.7OceanSITES 10:00-10:30. presented by Uwe Send, co-chair OceanSITES Executive Committee. Doc 4.1.7 expected.4.1.8International Ocean Carbon Coordination Programme (IOCCP) 11:00-11:30. presented by Maciej Telszewski, deputy director IOCCP. Doc 4.1.8 available.4.1.9Global Ocean Ship-based Hydrographic Investigations Program (GO-SHIP) 11:30-12:00. presented by Bernadette Sloyan, co-chair. Doc 4.1.9 available.4.2Discussion 12:00-12:30. Discussion of the particular issues and challenges raised, and the general challenge of adjusting network goals to new requirements, and sustaining and identifying new funding sources5Identifying and working on common challenges and building positive synergies5.1Technical coordination5.1.1JCOMMOPS goals and priorities Tuesday PM 14:00-14:30. presented by Mathieu Belbeoch, JCOMMOPS, Argo Technical Coordinator. Doc 5.1.1 available.5.1.2Followup on proposal process to expand and sustain technical coordination 14:30-15:10. presented by Clark. Background documents: requirements for an expanded OPSC sent out during bid process.5.2The interface between national and regional initiatives and the global system 15:30-16:00. Tim Moultmann, director of the Australian Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS), will provide an introduction to this discussion from the perspective of Australia5.3Legacy recommendations from the JCOMM pilot project for WIGOS 16:00-16:30. presented by Charpentier5.4Technology infusion and pilot projects 16:30-17:00. Discussion led by David Meldrum. Based on inputs from each network, the goal of the discussion will be to identify interfaces between groups to be nurtured, and potential joint pilot projects to undertake.5.5Instrument and data standards and best practices 17:00-17:30. Clark will introduce work on a JCOMM catalogue of best practices and standards, and lead a discussion on needed actions at the network and JCOMM levels.5.6Data management Wednesday AM 9:00-9:45. Sissy Iona, coordinator of the JCOMM Data Management Programme Area (DMPA) will introduce this item. Short Doc 5.6 expected.5.7Common challenges 9:45-10:15. Discussion of approaches for common challenges, such as: deployment opportunities for autonomous platforms, communications, working with commercial ships / industry, ship time requirements, integration and funding stovepipes; and how to move forward identifying positive synergies6Work plan / milestones / recommendations 10:45-11:45. Review of the decisions, recommendations, and actions decided by the coordination group.7Issues to raise at the JCOMM-wide and intergovernmental (WMO, IOC) level 11:45-12:15.8Closing 12:15-12:30. The session is expected to close by lunchtime on Wednesday 20 April 2011. ____________ ANNEX II LIST OF Participants Kentaro ANDO Research Scientist Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka Research Institute for Global Change Japan Marine Science and Technology Centre 2-15 Natsushima-cho Yokosuka 237-0061 Japan Tel: +81-46-867-9462 Fax: +81-46-867-9835 Email: andouk@jamstec.go.jp Graeme BALL Manager, Marine Operations Group Bureau of Meteorology GPO Box 1289 Melbourne VIC 3001 Australia Tel: +61-3 9669 4203 Fax: +61-3 9669 4168 Email: g.ball@bom.gov.au Dr Ian BARTON Reaearch scientist State Ministry of Research and Technology Australia Tel: +61 3 62325481 Fax: +61 3 62325123 Email: ian.barton@marine.csiro.au Mathieu BELBEOCH Argo Technical Coordinator JCOMMOPS 8-10 rue Herms Parc Technologique du Canal 31520 Ramonville St Agne France Tel: +33 5 61 39 47 30 Fax: +33 5 61 75 10 14 Email: belbeoch@jcommops.org Gary BRASSINGTON Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between the Australian Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO PO Box 1289 700 Collins Street Melbourne 3001 Australia Tel: +61 3 9669 4170 Fax: +61 3 9669 4660 Email: g.brassington@bom.gov.au Etienne CHARPENTIER Scientific Officer World Meteorological Organization Observing and Information Systems Department Observing Systems Division World Meteorological Organization 7bis, av. de la Paix Case Postale 2300 1211 Genve 2 Switzerland Tel: +41 22 730 82 23 Fax: +41 22 730 81 28 Email: ECharpentier@wmo.int Candyce CLARK National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring NOAA/Climate Program Office (CPO) Climate Observation Division 1100 Wayne Avenue, suite 1202 Silver Spring MD 20910 United States Tel: +1 301 427 2463 Fax: +1 301 427 0033 Email: candyce.clark@noaa.gov Peter DEXTER Co-president of JCOMM Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne International Oceans Policy Advisor Bureau of Meteorology GPO Box 1289 Melbourne VIC 3001 Australia Tel: +61 (0) 3 9669 4870 Fax: +61 (0) 3 9669 4725 Email: p.dexter@bom.gov.au Albert FISCHER Programme Specialist, Technical Secretary of OOPC Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1 rue Miollis 75732 Paris cedex 15 France Tel: +33 1 45 68 40 40 Fax: +33 1 45 68 58 13 Email: a.fischer@unesco.org Gustavo J. GONI National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories Physical Oceanography Division USDC/NOAA/AOML/PHOD 4301 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami FL 33149 United States Tel: +1 305-361-4339 Fax: +1 305-361-4412 Email: gustavo.goni@noaa.gov D. E. HARRISON NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 United States Tel: +1 206 526 6225 Fax: +1 206 526 6744 Email: d.e.harrison@noaa.gov Sissy IONA Head HNODC Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Anavyssos Institute of Oceanography 46.7 Km, Athens-Sounio Ave. PO BOX 712 Anavyssos 190 13 Attica Greece Tel: +30-22910-76367 Fax: +30-22910-76347 Email: sissy@hnodc.hcmr.gr Ming JI Director Ocean Prediction Center, NOAA NOAA/NCEP Ocean Prediction Center 5200 Auth Road, Room 410 Camp Spring MD 20746-4304 United States Tel: +1 301 763 8000 x 7400 Fax: +1 301 763 8085 Email: Ming.Ji@noaa.gov David MELDRUM Research Fellow, Technology Development Scottish Association for Marine Science Scottish Marine Institute Oban, Scotland PA37 1QA United Kingdom Tel: +44 1631 559 273 Fax: +44 1631 559 001 Email: dtm@sams.ac.uk Tim MOLTANN Director Integrated Marine Observing System University of Tasmania Private Bag 110 Hobart Tasmania 7001 Australia Tel: + 03 6226 276 Fax: + 0407 558 004 Email: Tim.Moltmann@imos.org.au Steve RINTOUL CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Tasmania Marine Laboratories Castray Esplanade GPO BOx 1538 Hobart Tasmania 7001 Australia Email: Steve.Rintoul@csiro.au Andreas SCHILLER Theme Leader: The Dynamic Ocean State Ministry of Research and Technology CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Hobart GPO Box 1538 Hobart TAS 7001 Australia Tel: +61 3 6232 5300 Fax: +61 3 6232 5000 Email: Andreas.Schiller@csiro.au Uwe SEND Professor University of San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Mail Code 0230 University of California, San Diego La Jolla CA 92093-0230 United States Tel: +1 858 822-6710 Fax: +1 858 534-9820 Email: usend@ucsd.edu Bernadette SLOYAN CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Tasmania Marine Laboratories Castray Esplanade GPO BOx 1538 Hobart Tasmania 7001 Australia Email: Bernadette.Sloyan@csiro.au Maciej TELSZEWSKI IOCCP Deputy Project Director Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1 rue Miollis 75732 Paris cedex 15 France Tel: +33 (0)1 45 68 39 39 Email: m.telszewski@unesco.org Hester VIOLA Program Coordinator: Public, Agricultural and Marine Weather Services Australian Bureau of Meteorology GPO Box 1289 Melbourne VIC 3001 Australia Email: h.viola@bom.gov.au Al WALLACE DBCP Chairperson Environment Canada, Meteorological Service of Canada, Pacific and Yukon Region 201-401 Burrard Street VANCOUVER V6C 3S5 BC Canada Tel: +1 604 664 9090 Fax: +1 604 664 9004 Email: al.wallace@ec.gc.ca Susan WIJFFELS CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Tasmania Marine Laboratories Castray Esplanade GPO BOx 1538 Hobart Tasmania 7001 Australia Email: Susan.Wijffels@csiro.au  http://www.jcomm.info/ocg4  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7117  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7118  http://www.oceanobs09.net/wg/outputs.php  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7119  http://ioc-goos-oopc.org  Implementation Plan for the Global Observing System for Climate in Support of the UNFCCC (2010 Update), GCOS-138, GOOS-184, available at http://ioc-goos.org/goos-184  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7120  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7163  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7173  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7167  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7171  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7013  http://www.jcomm.info/sot6  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7172  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7180  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7161  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7175  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7181  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7651  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7179  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7178   http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7176  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7177  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7169  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7170  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7168  http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7375     JCOMM MR No.  REF JCOMM_MR_NO \h  \* MERGEFORMAT 85, p.  PAGE 10 JCOMM MR No.  REF JCOMM_MR_NO \h  \* MERGEFORMAT 85 JCOMM MR No.  REF JCOMM_MR_NO \h  \* MERGEFORMAT 85 JCOMM MR No.  REF JCOMM_MR_NO \h  \* MERGEFORMAT 85, Agenda, p.  PAGE 3 JCOMM MR No.  REF JCOMM_MR_NO \h  \* MERGEFORMAT 85 JCOMM MR No.  REF JCOMM_MR_NO \h  \* MERGEFORMAT 85, Participants list, p.  PAGE 1 JCOMM MR No.  REF JCOMM_MR_NO \h  \* MERGEFORMAT 85 JCOMM MR No.  REF JCOMM_MR_NO \h  \* MERGEFORMAT 85, Participants list, p.  PAGE 3  ./5>@QRbclmoq}~õ{rbP=%jhz 5CJU\^JmH sH "h7hz 5CJ\^JmH sH h7hz 5CJ^JmH sH hz 56CJ(hRhz 56CJ(h7hz 5^JmH sH h7hz OJQJ^JaJ h7hz CJ(OJQJ^JaJ(hz CJ(OJQJ^JaJ(h7hz CJ(OJQJ^J"h7hz 5;CJ(OJQJ^Jhz 5;CJ(OJQJ^Jh7hz OJQJ^J />?@Rcdefghij $ Sa$gdz $ Sxa$gdz $ SnJ xa$gdz $ Sa$gdz jklmnopq~ Sgdz $ S1$a$gdz $a$gdz $ Sgdz $ Sa$gdz  Q Z  ųšm[M@1hz 5;CJ(OJQJ^Jh7hz OJQJ^Jh7hz 5OJQJ^J#h7hz 5CJ^JaJmH sH %h7hz 56CJ]^JmH sH "h7hz 6CJ]^JmH sH h7hz CJ^JmH sH "h7hz 5CJ\^JmH sH #hz 5CJ\^JmHnHsH u%jhz 5CJU\^JmH sH 1jhaLhz 5CJU\^JmH sH hz 5CJ\^JmH sH    E Q $ S$Ifa$gdz $ S$If]a$gdz $ Sa$gdz  Sgdz Q R S T U V W X Y Z sss $ Sxa$gdz $ SnJ xa$gdz $ Sa$gdz ]kd$$IfxF&0J    4 xa  ±±yunbR-&.:. //+/>/G1\142525566;6@6*7-797989r999E:F:G:S:T:U:<< < <<<<<<1<P<T<üᡚ h Dhz h Dhz 5 hz 5 hkihz hN_hz hhz 0Jj~ hz U h Mhz hMQhz hx`hz H*hx`hz \ hx`hz hz jhz 0JUjhz Uh"hz 0J4,Y-./!11?22A33@44566/7778989r9:<==gdz gdz gdz  & F gdz & F gdz T<<<========>>?????@ @@!@;@=@I@X@@AAHBIBBBBBBBBBDDDDDDEE"E*E=EAEJEQEh+hz 5h Dhz 6 hz 5 h+hz hN_hz hN_hz 6jhz 0JUhqhz 0Jj hz Uhvhz 5h-Sj hz Ujhz Uhz h1hz 5 h Dhz 4=>??"@@AADEElFHHH6IcIKOMNNEOQHS & Fgdz & Fgdz gdz gdz  & Fgdz & Fgdz gdz QEEEEEEEEEEEE F FFF>FGGHH#H$HHHbIIIJJJ'J(J)JKKKKKKKKoLzLLLLMMM M M>MDMMMOMмвМhKhz 5h-Sj4 hz U hLVhz jhz 0JUhj`hz 0Jj! hz Ujhz Uh Dhz 5h*|hz 5 hz 5h+hz 5hz h Dhz 7OMVMdMkMuMMMMNNN O_O`OOOOOOO7P`QaQcQdQQQQQQQRR)SGSHS^S_SdSeSfShSSST TTTT+UdUUUUUV Vѽѳ𞖞 h}hz hhz 5 hhz hLVhz hFJKLghn028=ACKŎΎԎ=CpvVԐڐ,:nϩh*Ghz 5 h*Ghz h Dhz 5jhz 0JUh9Ahz 0Jj hz U hkhz h-Sjhz Ujhz UhQl.hz H*hz h Dhz <348?`g;Qה06y}~Ö/B\i~%U\]@AhShz 0Jjhz Ujhz Uhu5hz 5 hz 5 h\Khz hUHhz 5h Dhz 6 h Dhz hz h Dhz 5 h>9hz >ӛ"ޟ/IuBxh & Fgdz gdz gdz ݟޟEOUt~šJPVĢ &9:R[jlץ)V_-./7񸮸ԦԦԦh Dhz 56h Dhz 5hz OJQJ^Jh^hz OJQJ^J hVhz hGhz 5 h Dhz h Dhz 6 hGhz h2hz hz jhz 0JU:7At©ɩ٪nīʫ˫bĬ #&'.Owx H󮹥jhz 0JUh1jBhz 0Jj0hz Ujhz U hLVhz hFTj(*gdz (HIX +U F*gdz G[mz"0ELf%?@*gdz @L] $%5eyI S%gdz *gdz HIJK567/012()*+{|}~ h hz h@a{hz h4,zhz hj`hz hqhz hhz hx`hz 6 hD9"hz hhz hr`hz h}rhz jhz 0JUh7hz OJQJ^JaJhz hz hF=EOJQJ^JaJ450)|?81-&yz|}>?@A789:0123,-./%&'(xyzh(m hF=Ehz hvnhz hV%:hz h1jBhz h9Ahz hBhz hhhz hzshz h"hz h"hz hj{hz h/7hz jhz 0JUhz hN"hz OJQJU^J h|hz h-SmHnHujhz U#h-Sh-SOJQJ^JmHnHu'j=hN"hz OJQJU^J!jhN"hz OJQJU^Jhz OJQJ^JhN"hz OJQJ^Jhz hY5Bhz h(mjh(mU+GHI $h]ha$gdz $a$$a$gdz 12BCEFGIJPVWkl|}ԮԮԍ|h'j?hN"hz OJQJU^Jh-SmHnHujhz Uh^hz OJQJ^J'j??hN"hz OJQJU^J#h-Sh-SOJQJ^JmHnHu'j>hN"hz OJQJU^J!jhN"hz OJQJU^Jhz OJQJ^JhN"hz OJQJ^Jhz (  '(./0124567=CDXYijlmnorsyžⰔpž'j@hN"hz OJQJU^J hMbhz h-SmHnHujhz U'j1@hN"hz OJQJU^Jhz OJQJ^Jhz h|hz hNO hz OJQJ#h-Sh-SOJQJ^JmHnHu!jhN"hz OJQJU^JhN"hz OJQJ^J,23456nopqr S%gdz $a$$a$gdz μβh7hz OJQJ^JaJh(m h|hz h-SmHnHuhz jhz Uhz OJQJ^J#h-Sh-SOJQJ^JmHnHu!jhN"hz OJQJU^J'j#AhN"hz OJQJU^JhN"hz OJQJ^JI 000P&P 1+:pK. A!n"n#n$%77 Dp1 0:pK. A!n"n#n$n% 1 0:pz . A!n"n#n$n% 1 0:pz . A!n"n#n$n% 1 0:pz . A!n"n#n$n% > 00P:pz . A!n"n#n$n% Dp.:pz . A!n"n#n$n% ; 0 00P. A!n"n#n$n% Dp;0P:pz . A!n"n#n$n% DpB 00P:pz . A!n"n#n$n% P Dp> 00P:pz . A!n"n#n$n% DpD JCOMM_MR_NO85(Enter JCOMM Technical Report number hered$$If!vh#v0#v#vJ:V x5055J44 xyDyK  JCOMM_MR_NO{DyK  exec_summary{DyK  exec_summaryqDyK Annex_IsDyK  Annex_IIDyK yK 6http://www.jcomm.info/ocg4DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7117DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7118DyK yK Rhttp://www.oceanobs09.net/wg/outputs.phpDyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7119DyK yK 2http://ioc-goos-oopc.orgDyK yK :http://ioc-goos.org/goos-184DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7120}DyK _Ref167797914DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7163DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7173}DyK _Ref167977771DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7167DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7171DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7013DyK yK 6http://www.jcomm.info/sot6DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7172DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7180DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7161}DyK _Ref167977671}DyK _Ref167977771DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7175DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7181DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7651}DyK _Ref167797914DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7179}DyK _Ref168110641DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7178DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7164DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7176DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7177DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7169DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7170DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7168DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7174DyK yK http://www.jcomm.info/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=7375}DyK _Ref168118756}DyK _Ref167977771}DyK _Ref168118827}DyK _Ref168118955}DyK _Ref168119587$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234pn$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,534p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34pn$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,534p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234pn$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,534p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,5222 2,34p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234p$$If!vh#v#v:V 6,52234pyDyK  JCOMM_MR_NOyDyK  JCOMM_MR_NOyDyK  JCOMM_MR_NOyDyK  JCOMM_MR_NOyDyK  JCOMM_MR_NOyDyK  JCOMM_MR_NOyDyK  JCOMM_MR_NOyDyK  JCOMM_MR_NOb PJ_HmH nHsH tHP`P M(Normalx$CJOJPJQJ_HaJmH sH tH d@d  M Heading 1$$ & F@&5CJPJ\aJ mHsHtHd@d  M Heading 2$$ & Fh@&5CJPJ\aJmHsHtHX@X  M Heading 3$$ & F@&>*PJ\mHsHtHN@N  Heading 4$$@&a$CJ(OJQJ\aJ(\@\ cY[ Heading 5$$@&a$!6OJPJQJ\]^JnHtHT@T cY[ Heading 6$$@&a$5CJOJQJhmH sH \@\ cY[ Heading 7$ i1$@&5CJOJQJhmH sH ^@^ cY[ Heading 8$n1$@&`n56CJOJQJhmH sH ` @`  Heading 9 $$1$@&a$!5CJOJQJ\aJhmH sH DA D M(Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k (No List NoN  MHeading 1 Char5CJOJPJQJ\aJ \B@\ M( Body Text$a$'5CJ(OJPJQJaJmH nHsH tHPoP M(Body Text Char5CJ(PJmH nHsH tHdO"d M(Figure caption  & Fx6CJOJPJQJaJmH sH D @2D M(Footer !x mHsHtHBoAB M( Footer CharCJOJPJQJaJ@&`Q@ M(Footnote ReferenceH*J@bJ  Footnote Text(CJmHsHtHPoqP Footnote Text CharCJOJPJQJaJD@D M(Header !x mHsHtHBoB M( Header CharCJOJPJQJaJbOb M(Heading 2 NoNum 5CJOJPJQJaJmH sH B1B M(Heading 3 NoNum  & FBB M(Heading 1 NoNum  & F6U`6 M( Hyperlink >*B*ph:)`: M( Page Number CJOJQJBOB M( Table caption  & F6>@> M(pTOC 1 Sx^S`5:: M(pTOC 2!7:^7`:NN M(pTOC 3)" nx n;]^n`;B'`1B ByComment ReferenceCJaJD@BD %By Comment Text$CJmHsHtHNoQN $ByComment Text CharCJOJPJQJaJLj@ABL 'ByComment Subject&5\mHsHtHZoqZ &ByComment Subject Char5CJOJPJQJ\aJT@T )By Balloon Text(CJOJQJaJmHsHtHNoN (ByBalloon Text CharCJOJPJQJaJ<O< `T Participants*CJP`PdRevision+$CJOJPJQJ_HaJmH sH tH FV`F aFFollowedHyperlink >*B*phNoA N  MHeading 2 Char5CJOJPJQJ\aJNoQ N  MHeading 3 Char>*CJOJPJQJ\aJPK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭V$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3N)cbJ uV4(Tn 7_?m-ٛ{UBwznʜ"Z xJZp; {/<P;,)''KQk5qpN8KGbe Sd̛\17 pa>SR! 3K4'+rzQ TTIIvt]Kc⫲K#v5+|D~O@%\w_nN[L9KqgVhn R!y+Un;*&/HrT >>\ t=.Tġ S; Z~!P9giCڧ!# B,;X=ۻ,I2UWV9$lk=Aj;{AP79|s*Y;̠[MCۿhf]o{oY=1kyVV5E8Vk+֜\80X4D)!!?*|fv u"xA@T_q64)kڬuV7 t '%;i9s9x,ڎ-45xd8?ǘd/Y|t &LILJ`& -Gt/PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 0_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!0C)theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] t !M#T2:(BGPF_ `pbfiifosOz~K [ pA\WPf _XTM 212  K ~    W    E XXZ\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\  "\^^TTTTTTTTTVVY 'E/+T<QEOM V=dbmv71%%zjQ  ,=HSmcZh:[RJZ^ |S[V%3(@ ( * X x z fsOS ! !#.#L#1F2S2555H:::AB'BDE E_GGGOOP^7_E___`bbbobeffh[ihimmmnnnnXoeoYsssyAzNz}}}k~~~3NU݁=J@RMZk˴شVqxǽ?ZaǾ/3FXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXADJQTi/UXk+.GNPY!!!!@ @H 0(  0(  B S  ? JCOMM_MR_NO _Hlt330477357 _Hlt330477358 _Hlt330477416 _Hlt330477455 _Hlt330477472 exec_summarysession_report _Ref168118756 _Ref167977771 _Ref168110641 _Ref168118827 _Ref168118955 _Ref167797914 _Ref168119587 _Ref167977671Annex_IAnnex_IIAcronyms _Hlt220724098  X 26AFa]en<2@@@@@ @+ + {  ?bADGaaenmH:  + - X { } t/6tuvBODS ! !"#M#N#P#a#$$3%=%(())2);)**5+?+,,X0_0w1111T2U2V2g2555558888;:H:::::AAhAjAAAAA(B)B*B8BBBDD E EE#E,EPFUFEG_GGGGG4I>IKKOOP P PPOTVTVVaXkXYZ%Z-Z6Z@ZZZ^^F_G_H_Z___ ` ` ``|``aaaaabpbqbrbbbbddeefff,fhhiijikixikkmmmmmmwnnnnnnfogoho|opps sLsYsssss7xGxyyyyyyzzzz||}}}}}}}[~k~~~~~Ȁ̀!3VWkqˁ݁KLMY=ACKņ͆<DЋڋɌӌMQƏяHWr{%-.@Ւޒ!–̖pzנ7?-6ݥMU9ç̧  HO}ARЮ[\]q!_kٴڴxCVyzȽɽ?bcuȾɾ45@47GQLPV]4;EK\e[bqtyyz|} FV'1Cm$5\g ( + X { j p ^et2OCS !#M#~**17181q11T23355"8(8996AbAFDGKKL+M,MdMdOOVVVV1^f^g^^^^aa]eaehhnnnn ssuvyy}}OUX_;<mbk#&PTĢHtx 2&*9λcAHSU'0 %&\eCDR[;<S\'0bcqz0927HK47/2(+{~>A7:03,/%(xz|}33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333EH + X { ^ftOS !#M#%&7*?***4+A+++,,-- ..)///y//011T255p7799+KfKdOOT9TTT$UhU8VwVWXXXhYYg^^aa]ebehhnnrsnyy}}X` 3*:ϻAI DQ\`=6Y&-Q=`"wguTX\`<Z&(z|} CG} /6CjnВ  b+$1 4*DP4kfghijCe VvPlΠqG`DĐKp"v] (z *ltA]-tz^wg:JAJ<ɀ1E[=6&Dgj=g7>*O`O@r-m@N|EhָeUbz=DVP|YG֯ |ZZLb R(hXj"QS*o(*hH..  x^`xo(hH.... ^`o(hH .....  X^ `Xo(hH ......  ^ `o(hH.......  8^`8o(hH........  `^``o(hH.........nn^n`o(Part 77^7`o(.8^`8o(..x^`xo(.... ^`o( .....  X^ `Xo( ......  ^ `o(....... 8^`8o(........ `^``o(......... ^`56o(Table .^`.pL^p`L.@ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PL^P`L.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHtt^t`o(.tt^t`o(..tt^t`o(...tt^t`o(.... tt^t`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........ ^`o(.........h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHtt^t`o(tt^t`o(.tt^t`o(..tt^t`o(... tt^t`o( .... tt^t`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........ 77^7`o(hH 77^7`o(hH.8^`8>*o(*hH.. x^`xo(hH.... ^`o(hH .....  X^ `Xo(hH ......  ^ `o(hH.......  8^`8o(hH........  `^``o(hH.........h^`@EH.8nn^n`56789;<CJH*OJQJS*TX^JaJo(.8nn^n`56789;<CJH*OJQJS*TX^JaJo(.0^`56789;<CJH*OJQJS*TXo(..Z^`o(Z^`o(Z^`o(Z^`o(Z^`o(Z^`o( |Z$1Ce qGE[=jl!3 ~J<T{z *wg:P> ( j==DVZLb|YKp"m@m@m@eU|E]-O`O@4*?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUWXYZ[\]_`abcdefghijkpqtRoot Entry F@lesData A1TableeWordDocument SummaryInformation(VDocumentSummaryInformation8^MsoDataStoreCRe@jeG1SNEGPDO==2CRe@jeItem  PropertiesUCompObj r   F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q